1 / 11

A Framework for Identifying High Conservation Value Aquatic Ecosystems

A Framework for Identifying High Conservation Value Aquatic Ecosystems. Harry Abrahams. © Andrew Tatnell. Overview. Paragraph 25 x of the National Water Initiative:

leander
Download Presentation

A Framework for Identifying High Conservation Value Aquatic Ecosystems

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. A Framework for Identifying High Conservation Value Aquatic Ecosystems Harry Abrahams © Andrew Tatnell

  2. Overview • Paragraph 25 x of the National Water Initiative: parties have agreed their water access entitlements and planning frameworks will‘identify and acknowledge surface and groundwater systems of high conservation value and manage these systems to protect and enhance those values’

  3. Aquatic Ecosystems Task Group • Established under NRM Ministerial Council • Members from all jurisdictions • Provide a nationally coordinated approach to policy development for relevant cross-jurisdictional issues within the aquatic ecosystems context. • Oversee development of a national policy framework for identification, classification and management of HCVAE

  4. Definition • “Aquatic ecosystems”, are those that depend on flows, or periodic or sustained inundation/waterlogging for their ecological integrity (e.g. wetlands, rivers, karst and other groundwater dependent ecosystems, saltmarshes and estuaries) but do not generally include marine waters.

  5. Principles • The HCVAE framework should complement and build on existing jurisdictional initiatives. • The objective of the framework is ‘to provide a nationally consistent approach for the identification, classification and management of HCVAE.’ • Allow identification of Nationally Significant HCVAE’s

  6. Purposes • Not intended as a regulatory mechanism • Identify aquatic ecosystems of high conservation valueanddifferentiate between HCVAEs of national and regional importance • Improve knowledge of HCVAEs, information sharing and cross-jurisdictional coordination • Guide planning, investment and management decisions • Assist in meeting national and international obligations for protection of aquatic ecosystems

  7. Regionalisation • Australian Drainage Divisions system (together with IMCRA for marine ecosystems) adopted as the ‘best fit’ national regionalisation approach for aquatic ecosystems in Australia to apply to HCVAE and Ramsar, and • IBRA to be used to prioritise the identification and protection of HCVAEs under the National Reserve System

  8. Draft criteria for national significance • Representativeness • Diversity • Distinctiveness • ‘Strategic’ habitat • Evolutionary history • Naturalness • International recognition (eg Ramsar) automatically recognised

  9. Australian Government Investment • To assist jurisdictions in management beyond water management Australian Government has aligned investment programs to HCVAE process • Caring for Our Country • Northern Australia Water Futures Assessment • Great Artesian Basin Sustainability Initiative 3 • List of nationally significant HCVAEs to guide Australian Government investments • Links to National Reserve System • Links to Murray-Darling Basin Planning

  10. Next Steps • Initial focus on identification and classification • Trialling criteria • Governance framework and listing process • Classification system • Identify public consultation process for framework

  11. Thank You

More Related