140 likes | 230 Views
Discover the IDESG knowledge base for online identity resources. Explore the new standards adoption policy and learn about collaboration opportunities. Get involved in shaping the identity ecosystem with use cases, terms, and standards. Join SCC's efforts to address gaps and redundancies in technical standards for better interoperability, user experience, and security.
E N D
SCC Workplan C. Tilton
Press Releases • <boycott> • The IDESG announces the availability of the IDESG knowledge base which provides access to a repository of information regarding online identity use cases, terminology, and standards. • The IDESG SCC announces the publication of its standards adoption policy. This policy identifies the criteria to be used for the IDESG to adopt a standard as part of its identity ecosystem framework.
Workplan Most internal Most shared
Redundancies • All SCC work items are intended to serve the IDESG as a whole and as such are based on collaboration with other groups. • We WANT other groups to contribute to our work items – • Use cases • Terms & definitions • Standards
Gap • Lead/champion for IDE functional elements/models • SCC is only a contributor here • Other “related” work • IDEF model • TF/Accred models
Gaps (with IDEF model) • Model includes: • Privacy standards • Security standards • “Technical specifications” • We are focusing on technical standards, including those for: • Interoperability
Key attributes • Business model • Liability • User experience • C&A • User-centric • Opt-out • Federation • No passwords • Entice RPs to join • Role-based identity SCC - Supporting Role Only
What we did today & yesterday • Yesterday: SCC Orientation • Today: Workplan, collaboration process • Charter • Tonight: Joint meeting with Security & Financial committees on: • Use cases • More tomorrow • Taxonomy • Terminology recommendations • Top 15 terms – may be related to functional elements • Functional models
Collaboration • What does the collaboration process look like? • Models > inputs solicited • How do we motivate participation and contribution? • “Silo’d” nature of our work groups • Liaisons not working • Chairs group/list not enough • Wiki & discussion forum good, but also may not be sufficient • Push vs pull > notifications • Workshops • Outreach to stakeholder groups • Marketing/advertising • <use of Comms & Outreach committee>
Assign Lead Group Start Inventory Compilation IDEF Work Product • Vocabulary/glossary • Use cases • Adopted standards Draft work product Identify Sources Review & comment Create Format/Template Set Criteria Revise • Solicit Contributions • IDESG groups • IDESG plenary • External Receive needs & requirements Draft for ballot • Identify candidate content • From inventory • Other contributed MC approval Maintain Repository IDESG ballot • e.g., Wiki Compile content Publication IDESG Assess content Subsequent Revision(s) Collaboration (throughout)
Potential Collaboration Process Concept -> draft outline Steward ROW Wiki Existing Sources Advertise Initial/sample content Jumpstart Moderate (format, apply criteria) Contributions Expanded content Review & Comment Refined content Snapshot for Formalization (adoption) From stakeholders (including groups, workshops)
How to revise and update: Option Two, collaborate and moderate Contributors Moderators Wiki Moderators Contributors Moderators Contributors Store content in relatively free-form manner, Supports comments Moderate for quality of format, accuracy of information, etc. Contribute content and discuss other contributions according to their area of expertise
Sketch of a wiki based knowledge base containing Terms, Use Cases, Standards, etc. All of those are Concepts that can be expressed on a wiki page, then each group is a wiki Category.