1 / 22

MSW management in Seville and its surrounding area IPPC Implementation Experience

MSW management in Seville and its surrounding area IPPC Implementation Experience Seville June 12 th 2012. Contents Presentation of the group Firms belonging to the group History Aborgase Activities Installations Complex of Montemarta Cónica IPPC implementation

latika
Download Presentation

MSW management in Seville and its surrounding area IPPC Implementation Experience

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. MSW management in Seville and its surrounding area IPPC Implementation Experience Seville June 12th 2012

  2. Contents • Presentation of the group • Firms belonging to the group • History • Aborgase • Activities • Installations • Complex of Montemarta Cónica • IPPC implementation • Other firms of the group • Edifesa • Tegner • Energía sur de Europa • Conclusions • Contact information

  3. IPPC implementation process presentation IPPC certification process summary Overview of facilities Audit Results Actions carried out after audit Mayor impacts of implementing the standard

  4. 1 - IPPC Certification Process The administration The company Development of process description report May’05 Discussion and agreement on final process description report Nov’05 Initial Integrated Environmental Permit granting Oct’07 Carried out audit Apr’08 Correction of ”easily” corrigible issues Autum’08 Approved extension of Permit Jul’09 Proposal of plant modification project Mar’10 Accomplishment of plant modification project Apr’11 Fulfillment of all IEP requirements

  5. 2 - Facilities Covered under IPPC Permit – Montemarta Environmental Complex 4 Compost processing MSW Processing 5 Compost aging area Fermentation wharehouse 3 Metal recycling plant 6 Plastic recycling plant Gross MSW processing 2 Weight bridge 1

  6. 2 - Facilities Covered under IPPC Permit – Montemarta Environmental Complex 1 2 Active landfill Gas field 5 Closed areas Leachate treatment plants 4 Leachate pool Landfill gas power plant 3 Landfill

  7. 2 - Facilities Covered under IPPC Permit – Montemarta Environmental Complex Other waste Construction and demolition plant 3 Hospital waste plant 2 Recycle plant 1

  8. 3 - Audit Results Nature • Procedure • Technical • Documents • Immediate accomplishment • Carried out on April 2008 • Implemented according to IPPC standard • Verified 164 issues • 134  in order • 30  no conformities Classification according to Corrective measure • Clarification required • Immediate corrective action • Beyond Aborgase scope 6 7 134 7 9 17 30 No conformities 11 30 3

  9. Clarification required Solution beyond Aborgase scope 3 - Audit Results Immediate solution

  10. 4 - Immediate solution (I) 8 9 12 13 12 13

  11. 4 - Immediate solution (II) 15 22 23 22

  12. 4 - Clarification required (I) 1 2 3 4

  13. 4 - Clarification required (II) 14 16 17 18 19 20 16-20

  14. 4 - Clarification required (III) 25/26 27 28 28 25 9 kms

  15. 4 - Clarification required (IV) 29 30

  16. 4 - Solution beyond Aborgase (I) 5 6 7 5

  17. 4 - Solution beyond Aborgase (II) 10 11 24 24 10

  18. 4 - Audit Results done done done done done done done done All no conformities found were finally corrected, except 3 whose solution exceeded ABORGASE scope; but were partially solved done Partially Partially done done done done done done done done done done done done Partially done done done done done done

  19. 5 - Major impacts - Operation and Investments IPPC Environmental Standard implementation has meant increase on control and recording levels, higher operation cost for processing 100% of incoming waste and additional investments in landfill and processing plant

  20. 5 - Major impacts - Operation and Investments Increase in controls and records Treat all waste and maximize recovery Landfill Standards Post closure activity

  21. Conclusions – IPPC Implementation • The whole certification process has taken 6 years, being still alive • The certification was completed successfully, being granted in October 2007, and extended in July 2009 • Out of a total 165 issues, just 30 were no conform • 7 were of immediate solution • 17 required discussion to really understand the situation and agree a feasible solution • In 6 the solution exceeded ABORGASE scope, 3 were solved by means of extra investment and in 2, were partially solved in agreement with the administration • The implementation process, moreover 6 years of work, has implied additional investments (9,4 M€), higher operation costs (+12%) and high increase in number of controls and records • The additional cost (investment and operation) are partially covered by ABORGASE • The IPPC has been a high challenge, but today we do a more responsible and respectful waste management activity

  22. Questions & Answers

More Related