The Credit Crunch of 2007-2008:
Download
1 / 38

Slides by Frederica Shockley California State University, Chico - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 106 Views
  • Uploaded on

The Credit Crunch of 2007-2008: A Discussion of the Background, Market Reactions, and Policy Responses - Paul Mizen. Slides by Frederica Shockley California State University, Chico Source: http://research.stlouisfed.org/publications/review/08/09/Mizen.pdf. “Mispricing of Risk”.

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about ' Slides by Frederica Shockley California State University, Chico' - larissa-keith


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript

The Credit Crunch of 2007-2008:

A Discussion of the Background, Market Reactions, and Policy Responses

- Paul Mizen

Slides by Frederica Shockley

California State University, Chico

Source: http://research.stlouisfed.org/publications/review/08/09/Mizen.pdf


Mispricing of risk
“Mispricing of Risk”

  • Crisis Due to “mispricing of risk” of new, complicated assets based upon subprime & other mortgages.

  • Highleverage contributed to risk.

  • House Prices ↓→ Foreclosures↑ → Bank Failures


Background
Background

  • The “Great Moderation” -years of macro stability

    • Low inflation

    • Low short-term interest rates

    • Steady growth

  • Global savings glut

  • Development of complex financial assets


Credit boom
Credit Boom

  • Fed dropped rates after dot com bust & again after 9/11.

  • Rising house prices

  • Stable economic conditions.


Disposable Income (DI) is income after taxes that is available for consumption & savings.


Savings flowed into u s
Savings Flowed into U.S. available for consumption & savings.

  • After 1997 Asian Crisismany countries bought U.S. treasuries & bonds.

    • Prices of Bonds ↑→ interest rates ↓→ Credit ↑

    • Savings from less developed countries funded our deficits with growing imbalance.

  • 1993 to 2005: U.S. savings as % of DI ↓ from 6% to 1%;

  • Total debt to DI ↑ from 75% to 120%


This is debt to Disposable Income (DI) which is income after taxes that is available for consumption & savings.


U s mortgages
U.S. Mortgages taxes that is available for consumption & savings.

  • Prime: borrowers have good credit & meet income & house pricing requirements.

  • Jumbo: borrowers have good credit & meet income requirements, but house price > amount set by Fannie&Freddie.

  • Alt-A have higher risk of default because they do not conform to Fannie & Freddie requirements.

  • Sub-prime: most risky loans often made to people with bad credit history.


Mortgage Originations taxes that is available for consumption & savings.


Sub prime mortgages grew rapidly
Sub-Prime Mortgages Grew Rapidly taxes that is available for consumption & savings.

  • Late 90s increased to 13% of originations, but halted by dot com bust.

  • 2002 – 2006: By 2006 Sub-Prime mortgages = 20% of originations.

  • Borrower faces higher upfront fees.

  • Lender faces higher probability of prepayment or default.


Asset backed securities
Asset Backed Securities taxes that is available for consumption & savings.

  • Ginnie Mae &VA sold firstsecurities backed by mortgages in 1968.

  • $10.7 T in global asset backed securities by 2006 (Bank of England).

  • Many purchased by off-balance sheet institutions owned by banks that originally sold securitized products.


Complex securities
Complex Securities taxes that is available for consumption & savings.

  • CDO’s, CDO’s Squared, CDO’s Cubed!

  • Great variation in characteristics of sub-prime mortgages bundled together.

  • Not all low credit quality

  • Many borrowers depended upon rising home value to allow refi.

  • Many who bought securities did not understand risk.


Sub prime trigger
Sub-Prime Trigger taxes that is available for consumption & savings.

  • The sub-prime mortgage market triggered the crisis.

  • Default rates started increasing in 2006.

  • Pooled mortgagesrisky because defaults positively correlated.

  • Investors highly leveraged.

    • If 20 to 1 → 5% loss → 100% capital ↓

    • Investors lose all with only low default rates.


Global impact
Global Impact taxes that is available for consumption & savings.

  • Originator faced low risk even if borrower defaulted.

  • Automated underwriting& outsourcing of credit scoreshelped originators sell moremortgages.

  • With low interest rates throughout the world, investors “reached for yield.”

  • Sales of securities went global.


Sub prime assets
Sub-Prime Assets taxes that is available for consumption & savings.

  • Subprime was trigger, but other high yielding assets, e.g. hedge funds, could have started the crisis.

  • People bought risky, complicated assets because return was high.

  • After sub-prime defaults increased, rating agenciesdowngraded many sub-prime backed securities.


Corporations lost billions
Corporations Lost Billions taxes that is available for consumption & savings.

  • Assets difficult to assess → Uncertainty ↑ →banks stopped loaning to other banks.

A write down is the amount by which an asset’s value is reduced.


Bear Stearns collapsed after hedge funds failed to taxes that is available for consumption & savings.rollover asset backed commercial paper.


Structured investment vehicle siv
Structured Investment Vehicle (SIV) taxes that is available for consumption & savings.

  • Funds that borrowed in short term commercial paper market to finance assets that they held long term.

  • Borrowed at low rate & bought long-term securities that paid high interest.

  • Some intended to run indefinitely, but all gone by Oct. 2008.


Liquidity crisis
Liquidity Crisis taxes that is available for consumption & savings.

  • Banks afraid to loan because they might have to cover losses on their conduits or SIV’s.

  • The Libor-OIS spread increased from a long-run 10 basis points to 364 in 10/08.

    • The London inter-bank offer rate indicates is the rate that banks charge each other for loans of 1 day to 5 years.

    • The London inter-bank offer rate indicates is the rate that banks charge each other for loans of 1 day to 5 years.


The London inter-bank offer rate indicates is the rate that banks charge each other for loans of 1 day to 5 years.


Three month libor ois spread
Three Month LIBOR – OIS Spread banks charge each other for loans of 1 day to 5 years.

  • Indicator of confidence banks have in other banks.

  • Usually about 10 basis points, but peaked at 364 on 10/10/08.

  • Greenspan says TARP decreased spread.

Source: http://www.microcappress.com/blog/credit-re-freeze-nipped-in-the-bud/641/


Credit markets froze
Credit Markets Froze banks charge each other for loans of 1 day to 5 years.


Cost of insurance increased

LCFI = banks charge each other for loans of 1 day to 5 years.Large Complex Financial Institution

Cost of Insurance Increased


Originate distribute baking
Originate & Distribute Baking banks charge each other for loans of 1 day to 5 years.

  • In use for 40 years, but opacity ↑→ mispricing of risk:

    • Residential MSB’s backed by sub-prime mortgages ↑

    • Steps between originator & holder ↑

  • Distorted incentives.

  • Difficult to evaluate risk.


Six bad incentive mechanisms
Six Bad Incentive Mechanisms banks charge each other for loans of 1 day to 5 years.

  • 1. Mortgage brokers motivated by up-front fees independent of borrower quality.

    • Often not employees of mortgage originators → not subject to regulation.

    • Fraud in some cases.

  • 2. Originators had no more incentive to seek quality borrowers than did brokers.

    • Investors wanted more mortgages.

    • Automated underwriting systems made mortgages loser & faster.


More bad incentives
More Bad Incentives banks charge each other for loans of 1 day to 5 years.

  • 3. Mortgages ↑→Securitization profits for originators ↑

    • Quality of new borrowers ↓ → Standards ↓ → NINJA loans – No Verified Income, Job, or Assets.

    • Piggyback loans ↑

    • Over time Risk of default ↑


More bad incentives1
More Bad Incentives banks charge each other for loans of 1 day to 5 years.

  • 4. Tranching allowed financial entities to tailor securities for varying levels of risk preference.

  • 5. Rating agencies made income rating these financial products.

    • Issuers paid up-front fees to rating agency.

    • Rating agencies sold advice to issuers on how to get desired rating.


More bad incentives2
More Bad Incentives banks charge each other for loans of 1 day to 5 years.

  • 6. CDO’s ↑ → Return ↑→ Fund manager bonuses ↑

“As long as the music is playing, you’ve got to get up and dance. We’re still dancing.” Chuck Prince, former CEO Citigroup. http://research.stlouisfed.org/publications/review/08/09/Mizen.pdf (page 22)


The result
The Result banks charge each other for loans of 1 day to 5 years.

  • Incentives of brokers, originators, SPV’s, rating agencies, & fund managers the same.

  • No principal agent problem!


Regulation supervision accounting practices
Regulation, Supervision, & Accounting Practices banks charge each other for loans of 1 day to 5 years.

  • Originators often ignored the quality of borrowers & Fed & state agencies did nothing.

  • Originators may have engaged in predatory lending.

  • Consumer protection legislation not enforced.


Cra regs encourage risky loans
CRA banks charge each other for loans of 1 day to 5 years. Regs Encourage Risky Loans

  • HUD required Freddie & Fannie to buy mortgage securities for low income homeowners mid 90s.

  • HUD expected originators to impose higher standards on such lenders, but Freddie & Fannie bought the mortgages anyway.

  • Such securities increased 2004 to 2006.


New fed rules for higher priced mortgages
New Fed Rules for “Higher Priced” Mortgages banks charge each other for loans of 1 day to 5 years.

Escrow

First lien mortgage loans are the first or original mortgages taken out when someone buys a mortgage.

Source: http://research.stlouisfed.org/publications/review/08/09/Mizen.pdf (Page 30)


Other potential changes
Other Potential Changes banks charge each other for loans of 1 day to 5 years.

  • Require banks to hold same capital requirements for “off-balance-sheet” entities, e.g. SIV’s & conduits.

  • Regulators need to evaluate the “big picture” in order to reduce the externality cost of excessive risk taking.


Regulation of rating agencies
Regulation of Rating Agencies banks charge each other for loans of 1 day to 5 years.

  • Rating agencies should be single product firms.

  • They need to use models that take into consideration longer spans of data.

  • They need to be subject to regulation.


Conclusions
Conclusions banks charge each other for loans of 1 day to 5 years.

  • Reasons for credit crisis:

    • Period of macro stability with low inflation & low interest rates.

    • Big increase in supply of loanable funds.

    • Financial innovation resulted in complex instruments, e.g. MBS’s.

      • Higher leverage;

      • Sub-prime mortgages.

    • Risk assessment failed.


Conclusions1
Conclusions banks charge each other for loans of 1 day to 5 years.

  • No one expected housing prices to fall nationwide.

  • Nationwide falling housing prices & higher interest rates led to defaults.

  • Other high yield assets, e.g. hedge funds, could have been trigger.

  • Bank failures led to credit freeze in commercial paper.


Conclusions2
Conclusions banks charge each other for loans of 1 day to 5 years.

  • Central bankers stepped in to provide liquidity.

  • Regulation will need to increase if we are to prevent future crises.


ad