1 / 29

Regional and Neighborhood Development: Planning the Evolution of Our Suburbs

Regional and Neighborhood Development: Planning the Evolution of Our Suburbs. A Special Presentation to the USGBC Fox Valley Chapter Mahender Vasandani Chairman. Education and Outreach Committee, CNU-Illinois August 27, 2009. What I Will Talk About:

lara
Download Presentation

Regional and Neighborhood Development: Planning the Evolution of Our Suburbs

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Regional and Neighborhood Development: Planning the Evolution of Our Suburbs A Special Presentation to the USGBC Fox Valley Chapter Mahender Vasandani Chairman. Education and Outreach Committee, CNU-Illinois August 27, 2009

  2. What I Will Talk About: • Where Are We Today in Terms of Regional Growth? • What Are the Implications of the “Big Challenges” for Evolution of Suburbs? • Why the Suburbs May Need to Evolve? • Are There Any Preferred Growth Options? • What Can We Learn from the Cities? • New Urbanism Offers Some Key Answers • Specific NU Examples Suitable For Suburbs • Overview of Form-Based Codes/A NU Implementation Tool • Q & A

  3. Far Chicago Suburbs

  4. Where Are We Today? • Acknowledgement: Ours Is A Suburban Nation • (In A Capitalist Democracy) • From 1950 to 2000: 90% of metropolitan growth in the Suburbs • By 2000: • 60% of metro jobs in the Suburbs • Suburb-to-Suburb job commutes 2X Suburb-City commutes • From 1970 to 2000: • Total Housing Units Increased 9% • Suburban Housing Units Increased Almost 100% • Questions: • Is This All Good? All Bad? Or, Are There Pros And Cons? • What Are the Implications for Future Regional Growth?

  5. The “Leinbergers” vs. The “Kotkins” Implications for the Future… Response Depends on One’s Perspective on the Age-Old Debate: http://www.latimes.com/news/printedition/opinion/la-op-kotkin6-2008jul06,0,1038461.story

  6. Implications for the Future… • My view: To survive/thrive in the future: • Suburban regions will need to: • Provide for all transportation options: Cars, Trains, Buses, Bicycles and Pedestrian-ways • Extend Existing Commuter Service to Outlying Suburbs • Start the new Metra “STAR” Line • Suburbs will need to: • Allow mixing of uses • Allow diversity of housing options/housing types • Allow moderately higher densities • Allow street connectivity • Allow multi-functional streets/boulevards • Create compact and walkable neighborhoods • Create great places • ……Become More Urban (“New Urban”)

  7. Why Do the Suburbs Need to Evolve? • I. Economic Challenges: • Housing Over-Supply • Commercial Oversupply • Implications: • Limited/Slow Short-term Growth Potential; Extended Growth Time-lines • II. Energy Security/Climate-Change Challenges: • Over-dependence on high-carbon fossil fuels/GHG Emissions • Over-dependence on cars as sole form of mobility • Implications/Policy Questions: • ”Re-Order” Growth Patterns? • Reduce Total Car Travel? • New Mobility Technologies? • III. Community Character Challenge: • Little Attention to the Public Realm/Urban Form Implication: • Better Character and Quality of Life Can Provide Key Market Advantages

  8. Chicago Metro: Over 100 Years of Growth • “Re-Order” Growth Patterns 2020 2030 2040 2010 Source: Climate Change: “Re-Order” Regional Growth Patterns • Recommendations from • the Past and other States: • Create Growth Boundaries/ • Stop Suburbanization • Limit Infrastructure Spending • In Chicago Metro Area: • “Re-ordering” Virtually • Impossible for Historical • and Political Reasons • Most Strategies and • Benefits Possible at • Local Level • LEED-ND

  9. Reduce Total Travel Miles 2020 2030 2040 2010 Climate Change: Reduce Total Vehicle Miles Travelled Typical Recommendations: 1. Reduce Total Miles of Travel, 2. Encourage Higher Density Living 3. Encourage Live-Work Units 4. Encourage People to Live Close to Work 5. Build TODs 6. Avoid Car Trips • Trip-length shortening • not as beneficial as • cutting down on number of trips • -- Joe Cortright, Impresa Consulting for “CEOs for Cities” • California SB 375 Example • STAR LINE and TODs will cut down on auto trips • By increasing walkability New Urbanism will help achieve Trip Avoidance.

  10. Climate Change: New Mobility Technology New Alternate Zero-Emission Fuels and Alternate Vehicle Technologies* (*”Since VMT are not projected to decrease significantly in the near or long-term in the Chicago region, CMAP’s strategies to promote alternative fuels are important to help save energy and mitigate GHG and criteria pollutions” – Volpe Center, U.S. DOT -- October 2008 Action Strategy Paper on Climate Change and Energy) My Crystal Ball ???!!! Image source: www.discoveryresources.com • In Another Generation: • NMT use wide-spread • Less serious concern with GHG • emissions/pollution • 3. Little change in locational decisions • 4. More cars on limited capacity roads • MORE TRAFFIC CONGESTION • MORE NEED FOR WALKABLE,MIXED-USE COMMUNITIES with • TRANSIT OPTIONS NMT Evolution! Toyota FCHV in 2015 “Shockingly Low Price” -Toyota Motors www.autobloggreen.com July 20, 2009 article Honda FCX Clarity: 2009 2020 2030 2040 2010 • New Mobility Technology

  11. Suburban Evolution with New Urbanism • New Urbanism: A 20+ year old Planning and Urban Design Discipline • NU learns from the virtues of existing and past cities. • NU helps create: • Compact, Connected, Walkable, Diverse Neighborhoods with Mixed-Uses • Quality Public Realm and High Quality of Life • Distinct Transportation Solutions • New Codes and Tools for Implementation Examples from City of Chicago: Neighborhoods and Boulevards

  12. NU Design Principles for Suburban Neighborhoods • Create Inter-connected Street Network Between Neighborhoods • Create Neighborhoods with Centers with Mixed-Uses within Walking Distance of Most Residents • Locate Neighborhood Centers with Exposure and Access to Major Arterials • Allow A Variety of Residential Types • Allow Moderately High Densities • Focus on Urban Design along with concerns with land-use, transportation, finances and services • Help Create Quality Places/Stay competitive in market place • Evolve as a Suburban Community…Become More Urban – “New Urban”

  13. Key NU Design Principles Adopt not just a tax-revenue-based land-use policy… But also an Urban Design Policy...Allow Boulevards with Multiple Transportation Modes, Mixed-Uses and/or Multiple Residential Types (maybe not this dense) along Boulevards

  14. Key NU Design Principles For better traffic circulation and less traffic congestion, avoid/minimize cul-de-sacs and dead-end streets as they promote greater car dependence Instead, allow well-connected network of streets that may or may not be in rectilinear grids

  15. Suburban Evolution with New Urbanism: Example 1 Harbor Town, Memphis, TN: Variety of Residential Types Mixed-Uses Connected Neighborhoods Boulevard System Strong Sense of Place

  16. Suburban Evolution with New Urbanism: Example 2 New Town at St. Charles, MO: Innovative Variety of Residential Types Mixed-Use Center/Civic Center Integrated/Creative Stormwater System High-quality Public Realm/Sense of Place

  17. Suburban Evolution with New Urbanism: Example 3 Legacy Center, Plano, Texas Town Center on street grid Commercial, Office, Hotel, Restaurants, Townhomes, Condominiums/Apartments Central Civic Space/Sense of Place

  18. Suburban Evolution with New Urbanism: Example 4 Addison Circle, Addison, Texas: Close to suburban train station Primarily Residential with Townhomes and Apartments Major Open Space Central to Plan Moderately High Density High Quality of Space/Strong Sense of Place

  19. Suburban Evolution with New Urbanism: Example 5 Southlake Center, Southlake, Texas: Central Civic Space: Foreground to Village Hall Surrounded by Mixed-Use Shopping + Offices, Entertainment, Restaurants and Townhomes Major Innovation from Single-Use Shopping Center (as initially proposed) Highly Successful Community Destination/Community Pride

  20. Suburban Evolution with New Urbanism: Example 6 Plano TOD, Texas: New downtown/TOD at a DART station Moderately dense Neighborhoods with Mixed-Use Shopping Economic Development/Transit Ridership Increase/Sustainable Model

  21. Public Support for Transit Maintain/Repair Existing Roads, Highways, Bridges: 50% Build Walkable Communities: 25% Improve Public Transportation: 47% Improve Transit: 31% Not Sure: 8% Expand/Improve Roads: 16% Build New Roads: 20% Not Sure: 3% 1 2 Not Sure: 5% • Survey Questions*: • Transportation Priorities of Federal Government • Best Long-Term Solutions to Reduce Congestion • Transportation Approach to Accommodate Growth • *January 2009 Growth and Transportation Survey by Hart Assoc. • As reported in “Common Ground” Summer 2009, • Published by National Association of Realtors Build highways and freeways: 20% Build commuter rail, light rail and subways: 75% 3

  22. Federal Legislative Initiatives: Livable Communities Act • August 6, 2009: Senator Christopher Dodd introduced a • Livable Communities Act that will help communities: • Mitigate traffic congestion • Reduce greenhouse gas emissions • Cut down on fuel consumption • Protect open space • Build affordable housing • Revitalize existing main streets and urban centers • The Livable Communities Act will: • Create competitive planning grants to create long-term plans • Create challenge grants that towns and regions can use to implement these long-term plans • Establish a federal Office of Sustainable Housing and Communities at the HUD and oversee the Livable Communities grant programs; • Establish a federal Interagency Council on Sustainable Communities to coordinate federal • sustainable development policies.

  23. New Urbanism Regulations: Form-Based Codes • Relatively New Regulation Tool in Illinois • Based on A Community Vision • Focus is the Public Realm (Form and Quality of the Outside Built Environment) • Place-specific to Retain Existing Character • Several Urban Standards • Graphic/More Comprehensible • Predictable Urban Form and Character • Different from Conventional Zoning Regulations • FBCs more concerned with Urban Form, Less with Use • FBCs facilitate mixing of uses • Not concerned with F.A.R.s, Densities and Lot Coverages • Allow administrative approval of projects

  24. Form-Based Codes/Regulations • Focus on Quality of the Built Environment for Public Realm Public realm influenced by the architecture of buildings; the proportions of the size of public places to building heights and the amenities in the public places Project Credit: Dover Kohl & Partners

  25. Form-Based Codes/Regulations • Predictable Placement and Bulk of Buildings • PREDICTABILITY of massing • and bulk of future projects • Less public concern about • bulk and other impacts • Potential benefit: • Streamlined project review • process • Good for developers too Project Credit: Dover Kohl & Partners

  26. An Integrated Code with Standards for: Thoroughfares, Frontages, Building Types, Public Spaces, Landscaping – All Linked to a Regulating Plan • Typically Easier to Comprehend and Administer Form-Based Codes/Regulations

  27. Form-Based Codes/Regulations

  28. Closing Remarks • Future of Suburbs: Assumed to Evolve Given Economic, Energy and Climate Challenges • Evolution Will be Essential for Survival/Revival/”Thrival” • New Urbanism Offers Key Answers for Suburban Evolution • NU Design Principles Should be Part of a Suburban Community’s Policy • Quality Places and Quality of Life Will be Market Advantages • Form-Based Codes/Regulations Provide an Effective Tool • to Create Mixed-Use Centers and Achieve Community Vision

  29. Thank You! Mahender Vasandani Chairman, Education and Outreach Committee CNU-Illinois President M Square | Urban Design Phone: 630.845.1202 Email: mgv@msqre.com

More Related