210 likes | 303 Views
Explore the importance of hadronic contributions in aQED(MZ) through tests in particle decays. Dive into key calculations and comparisons for precise measurements. Review recent results and future projects in high-energy physics.
E N D
Importanza di R • aQED(MZ) • (g-2)m • Test di CVC nei decadimenti del t • Regole di somma di QCD e aS
2 3 (+,) 4 > 4 (+KK) 1.8 - 3.7 3.7 - 5 (+J/, ) 5 - 12 (+) 12 - < 1.8 GeV 2p contrib. ahad 8% [2mp - 0.5 GeV] 54% [0.6 - 1.0 GeV] 10% [Rest<1.8 GeV] r 2p contrib. dahad 8% [2mp - 0.5 GeV] 34% [0.6 - 1.0 GeV] 31% [Rest< 1.8 GeV] r > 1GeV Hadronic contributions to amhad Calculations based on Davier, Eidelman, Höcker, Zhang ahad <1.8 GeV 2[ahad] <1.8 GeV 1% e+e- data only!
Burkhardt & Pietrzyk 2001 Contributions toDahad magnitude errors Including KLOE results, a preliminary analysis of B.& P. found a value of Da(5)(mZ2) which confirms their 2001 estimate: Da(5)(mZ2) =0.02761±0.00036
Recent Results from… Place Ring Detector Ecm(GeV) pts Year Novosibirsk VEPP-2M CMD2,SND <1.4 128 ’01 ‘03 Frascati DAFNE KLOE <1 (via ISR) ’05 SLAC PEPII Babar <10 Gev (via ISR) (0.5-4.5 GeV) ’05,… Future Projects or Upgrades
Recent results with energy Scan: • After ’95 main results were published from CMD2 and SND @VEPP-2M and BESII@BEPC: • 1)VEPP-2M, Novosibirsk (exclusive measurements) 0.4 <Ecm<1.4 GeV • New results on e+e-p+ p- p+ p-, p+ p- po po (ssyst~7%), e+e-p+ p- po • (ssyst~12%), e+e-KS,KL, e+e-w p+ p-,hp+ p- (ssyst~15%) from CMD2 and SND • e+e-p+ p-from CMD2 with ssyst~1.4% published on ’99 and with ssyst~0.6% ( 0.61<E<0.96 GeV) published on ’01 • e+e-p+ p-from SND with ssyst~1.3%(hep-ex/0506076) • 2)BESII @ BEPC, Beijing (inclusive measurement) 2 <Ecm<5 GeV • New result on R in 2 <Ecm<5 GeV from BESII coll., with sR/R~7% • (improvement of a factor 2) • - New results on 4p from BES with sR/R~10% (presented on Oct 2005 in Frascati)
BES: 4p Luminosity (nb-1) 2(p+p-)
Recent/expected results with ISR: • 1)KLOE: • e+e-p+ p- with ssyst~1.3% (0.35<E<0.95 GeV2) published on ’05 • e+e-p+ p-at threshold is under way • (0.1 GeV2 bin width (5-20 MeV)) • 2)BABAR: • - e+e-p+ p- p0 between 1. and 3 GeV with ssyst~5%-10%published on ’05 • (25 MeV bin width) • - e+e- 4h (p+ p-p+ p-, p+ p-K+ K-, K+ K-K+ K-) between 0.6 and 4.5 GeV published on ’05: • - ssyst(p+ p-p+ p-) is 12% (<1GeV), 5%(1.-3 GeV), 16% (>3 GeV) • - ssyst(p+ p-K+ K-) is 15% (1.5-4.5 GeV) • - ssyst(K+ K-K+ K-) is 20% (2.0-4.5 GeV) • - e+e- 6h (3(p+ p-), 2(p+ p-)p0p0, 2(p+ p-) K+ K-) between 1.5 and 4.5 GeV with ssyst between 6 and 10% • e+e-p+ p-with ssyst<=1% is under way
Babar: 3p p+p-p0
Babar: 6p 3(p+p-) 2(p+p-)p0p0 Total systematic: ~6-8% Total systematic: ~11%
Babar: 2K4p 2(p+p-)K+K- Total systematic: ~7%
Proiezione a 10 anni Con cosa deve essere competitiva una misura tra 10 anni? • Babar... • BES... • VEPP 2000... • Altro? • La regione 1-2 GeV particolarmente interessante: l’errore attuale (15%) contribuisce con un 40% all’errore totale su Da(5)had
Open issues • Buco nella sezione d’urto multiadronica vicino a soglia p bar-b • narrow vector meson resonance, with a mass M 1.87 GeV and a width 10-20 MeV, consistent with an Nbar-N bound state
Open issues • Buco di FOCUS nella sezione d’urto dei 6p • Babar conferma in entrambi i canali
Errore percentuale ZOOM DR/R DR/R Punti con errore ~3% dalla misura inclusiva di BES PRL 84, 594 (2000) – PRL 88, 101802 (2002)