quantitative stock selection dynamic factor weights n.
Download
Skip this Video
Loading SlideShow in 5 Seconds..
Quantitative Stock Selection: Dynamic Factor Weights PowerPoint Presentation
Download Presentation
Quantitative Stock Selection: Dynamic Factor Weights

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 7

Quantitative Stock Selection: Dynamic Factor Weights - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 124 Views
  • Uploaded on

Quantitative Stock Selection: Dynamic Factor Weights. Campbell R. Harvey Duke University National Bureau of Economic Research. Dynamic Factor Weights. 1. We have identified five factors based on univariate quintile sorts: PB(1), PB(5), Mom(1), RR(1), ROE(5)

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'Quantitative Stock Selection: Dynamic Factor Weights' - kyros


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
quantitative stock selection dynamic factor weights

Quantitative Stock Selection:Dynamic Factor Weights

Campbell R. Harvey

Duke University

National Bureau of Economic Research

dynamic factor weights
Dynamic Factor Weights

1. We have identified five factors based on univariate quintile sorts: PB(1), PB(5), Mom(1), RR(1), ROE(5)

2. Fixed weight optimization involves pushing these five portfolio returns through an optimizer at some set level of volatility. The weights would serve as scores for individual securities.

dynamic factor weights1
Dynamic Factor Weights

3. Suppose the optimized weights are:

1.0 =PB(1)

-2.0 =PB(5)

.5 =Mom(1)

1.1 =RR(1)

-1.6 =ROE(5)

[Note the weights are set to sum to zero]

We would use these weights as scores and come up with a final scoring screen.

dynamic factor weights2
Dynamic Factor Weights

4. Suppose we think that RR only works when the term structure slope is greater than 1%. We create a 6th factor which is the interaction between RR and a dummy variable (Dum=1 if TS>100bp; 0 otherwise). The Dum is lagged one period.

5. We reoptimize with six portfolios (five ‘basis’ and one ‘dynamic trading strategy or DTS’)

6. We call this a DTS because is the return of an active strategy of investing in the RR portfolio only when TS>100bp.

dynamic factor weights3
Dynamic Factor Weights

8. The new weights are (all weights likely to change):

1.5 =PB(1)

-2.0 =PB(5)

0.8 =Mom(1)

-0.2 =RR(1)

-1.2 =ROE(5)

1.1 = RR(1)xDum

dynamic factor weights4
Dynamic Factor Weights

9. These new weights are dynamic. When lagged term structure is greater than 100bp, the RR factor gets a 0.9 weight (-0.2+1.1). When term structure is flat or negative, the weight is -0.2.

10. We don’t need to use discrete variables like dummies. We could use continuous variables.

dynamic factor weights5
Dynamic Factor Weights

11. We could have many different interaction variables. The variables could be different for each factor. It is even possible to interact two factors (however, be careful, to preserve the implementation, you must interact with the lagged value of the factor).

12. As the number of factors and interactions increase, we might need to Monte Carlo to achieve a stable frontier.