1 / 17

Aaron Lukaszewski Lindsey Stevenson Hutson Olsen

Perspectives on Memetics -Cultural Transmission as a Darwinian Selection Process- . Aaron Lukaszewski Lindsey Stevenson Hutson Olsen.

kyna
Download Presentation

Aaron Lukaszewski Lindsey Stevenson Hutson Olsen

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Perspectives on Memetics-Cultural Transmission as a Darwinian Selection Process- Aaron Lukaszewski Lindsey Stevenson Hutson Olsen

  2. Dawkins Pioneered Memetics • Memes are analogous to genes • Genes: instructions for making proteins • Memes: instructions for carrying out behavior • 3 ingredients of natural selection (the “evolutionary algorithm”) • Variation • Inheritance • Selection

  3. Dawkins, Continued • Memes seem to meet all three requirements • 3 attributes of a “successful replicator” • Fidelity: copying-accuracy • Fecundity: copying frequency • Longevity: the characteristic of remaining distributed in the population long enough for selection pressures to act

  4. Blackmore’s Book: The Meme Machine • Recently, Blackmore has become an outspoken and extreme proponent of memetic theory • Millions of memes are created each day • Memes are created by combination and variation of existing memes inside people’s brains or during transmission (this provides the variation necessary for selection to operate) • Memes hop from brain to brain (sometimes via an intermediary such as film or written word)—thus, they replicate their essence • Only the most successful memes (the ones that are most attractive to imitators) survive Blackmore, Susan (1999). The meme machine. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  5. Imitation • Blackmore (and Dawkins) defines memes as units of imitation • Imitation: the transmission of a meme from one brain to another, even if only the “gist” is transmitted • Memes can be • Songs • Stories • A way of performing a specific task • Fashioning a hand-axe Blackmore, Susan (1999). The meme machine. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  6. Blackmore Continued • 2 reasons why some memes succeed and others fail: • The nature of human beings as imitators and selectors • Evolved psychological mechanisms (our interpretation of her long-winded explanation of perceptual biases) • The nature of the memes themselves • The ways them combine and tag along with one another Blackmore, Susan (1999). The meme machine. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  7. Blackmore:Cui Bono? (“Who Benefits?”] • Because memes vary, are inherited, and are selected for, they are replicators which should be thought of by taking the “meme’s eye view” • Because there is enormous selection pressure, only the “best” replicators will prevail • Memes that most often occupy our incessant trains of thought will survive (may explain why the seemingly energetically wasteful business of the mind came to be) • Why so hard to meditate? Because memes are competing for mental rehearsal? Are memes “trying” to replicate? Blackmore, Susan (1999). The meme machine. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  8. Blackmore in Outer Space: Memetic Drive • “We seem to have a brain surplus to requirements, surplus to adaptive needs” (p.67) • What selection pressure explains this? • Blackmore: “The turning point in our evolutionary history was when we began to imitate each other” • This was the birth of a new replicator: the meme Blackmore, Susan (1999). The meme machine. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  9. Memetic Drive, continued • Imitation led to an increase in brain size because it required three skills: • Making decisions about what to imitate • Complex transformations from one point of view to another • Production of matching bodily actions • Initially, the selection pressure was biological: the best imitators were able to learn useful skills that facilitated survival Blackmore, Susan (1999). The meme machine. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  10. Memetic Drive, continued • Eventually, there may have been sexual selection pressures as well (“mate with the best imitators”) • If this is the case, we are designed in our modern form to be the hosts for memes to inhabit and replicate • Blackmore’s book is called “The Meme Machine” • We are the machines!!!! • Blackmore may be overextending the reach of the meme; we are not alone in making this assertion……………. Blackmore, Susan (1999). The meme machine. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  11. Gil-White • Argues that memes lack the copying fidelity to be considered selfish replicators • Memes mutate in every act of transmission (imitation), even by the same person!!!! • Meme’s eye view “does more to distort than enlighten our understanding of cultural processes” (p. 1) Gil-White, Francisco (2004). Common Misunderstandings of memes (and genes). In S. Hurley & N Chater (Eds), Perspectives on imitation: Form mirror neurons to memes: MIT Press.

  12. Gil-White, continued • However, memes can nonetheless be involved in a Darwinian selection process, if the copying distribution is around an average of perfect accuracy • Some produce a more effective replica • Some produce a less effective replica Gil-White, Francisco (2004). Common Misunderstandings of memes (and genes). In S. Hurley & N Chater (Eds), Perspectives on imitation: Form mirror neurons to memes: MIT Press.

  13. Gil-White, continued • Cumulative adaptation requires: • “Sufficient accuracy in production of descendents such that superior variants can occasionally emerge • Sufficient accuracy such that, at the pop level (x), we can speak of meaningful, directional, change” (p. 10) Gil-White, Francisco (2004). Common Misunderstandings of memes (and genes). In S. Hurley & N Chater (Eds), Perspectives on imitation: Form mirror neurons to memes: MIT Press.

  14. Gil-White, continued • Against Memetic Drive: “A meme cannot select for a gene unless is • Widespread (meta-populationally) and • Stable (inter-generationally)…. But for Blackmore, this is a catch-22, because what puts the meme in the position to select for a gene is the fact that this same gene evolved first” Thus, it appears that culture is just one of many influential selection pressures that subserves biological evolution Gil-White, Francisco (2004). Common Misunderstandings of memes (and genes). In S. Hurley & N Chater (Eds), Perspectives on imitation: Form mirror neurons to memes: MIT Press.

  15. Gil-White, continued • Stop Theorizing!! Do Research!!! • Memetics will never find secure footing without empirical support. Gil-White, Francisco (2004). Common Misunderstandings of memes (and genes). In S. Hurley & N Chater (Eds), Perspectives on imitation: Form mirror neurons to memes: MIT Press.

  16. Strengths • It appears that cumulative adaptation does happen at the cultural level (as discussed by Gil-White) • Memetics provides an excellent metaphoric framework for the discussion of cultural phenomena

  17. Weaknesses • Memetic Drive: Blackmore, though entertaining, is ultimately certifiable

More Related