Assessment Report Social Work (Graduate) School of Education and Human Services Jason Dauenhauer Chair Jason Dauenhauer/Pamela Viggiani Assessment Co-Chairs. What was Assessed Student Learning Outcomes. EP 2.1.1: Identify as a professional social worker and conduct oneself accordingly.
Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.
Assessment ReportSocial Work (Graduate)School of Education and Human ServicesJason DauenhauerChairJason Dauenhauer/Pamela ViggianiAssessment Co-Chairs
EP 2.1.1: Identify as a professional social worker and conduct oneself accordingly.
EP 2.1.2: Apply social work ethical principles to guide professional practice.
EP 2.1.3: Apply critical thinking to inform and communicate professional judgments.
EP 2.1.4: Engage diversity and difference in practice.
EP 2.1.5: Advance human rights and social and economic justice
*EP 2.1.6: Engage in research-informed practice and practice-informed research.
EP 2.1.7: Apply knowledge of human behavior and the social environment.
EP 2.1.8: Engage in policy practice to advance social and economic well-being and to deliver effective social work services.
EP 2.1.9: Respond to contexts that shape practice.
EP 2.1.10 Engage, assess, intervene, and evaluate with individuals, families, groups, organizations, and communities.
Course: SWK 630/631
Master’s Project Development/Master’s Project Implementation
Instrument/Assignment: Literature review section of master’s project proposal
Benchmark: 100% of students must achieve a "meets expectations' rating on the literature review section rubric.
Sample size (all eligible): n=61
Course: SWK 611 & SWK 613
Field Practicum/Seminar 4
Instrument: Final field instructor evaluations
Benchmark: 100% of students must achieve a 'competent' rating on the evaluation form. Range: 5=Advanced Competence, 4=Competent, 3=Emerging Competence, 2=Insufficient Progress, 1=Unacceptable Progress
Sample size (all eligible): n= 47
1. SWK 631: faculty are pleased with the high percentage of students who met expectations. The 3 students who did not meet expectations did not address copious feedback from faculty members to improve this section of their paper.
2. SWK 611/613: Field instructors (social work practitioners) may not be able to accurately judge these very ‘academic’ practice behaviors in the same context as a faculty member. Note: there are many practice behaviors for each competency and an average score of these behaviors count for the overall competency. Thus, if students are not achieving in one practice behavior, they may be exceeding in others which is acceptable for the accrediting body (CSWE).