Remote Sensing and Image Processing: 9

1. Remote Sensing and Image Processing: 9 Dr. Hassan J. Eghbali

2. Today….. • Application • Remote sensing of terrestrial vegetation and the global carbon cycle Dr. Hassan J. Eghbali

3. Why carbon? • CO2, CH4 etc. • greenhouse gases • Importance for understanding (and Kyoto etc...) • Lots in oceans of course, but less dynamic AND less prone to anthropogenic disturbance • de/afforestation • land use change (HUGE impact on dynamics) • Impact on us more direct Dr. Hassan J. Eghbali

4. The Global Carbon Cycle (Pg C and Pg C/yr) Atmosphere 730 Accumulation + 3.2 Net terrestrial uptake 1.4 Fossil fuels & cement production 6.3 Net ocean uptake 1.7 Atmosphere land exchange 120 Atmosphere ocean exchange 90 Vegetation 500 Soils & detritus 1,500 Runoff 0.8 Ocean store 38,000 Fossil organic carbon and minerals Burial 0.2 (1 Pg = 1015 g) Dr. Hassan J. Eghbali

5. CO2 – The missing sink Dr. Hassan J. Eghbali

6. CO2 – The Mauna Loa record Dr. Hassan J. Eghbali

7. Why carbon?? 280 ppm 180 ppm Thousands of Years (x1000) Dr. Hassan J. Eghbali

8. Why carbon? • Cox et al., 2000 – suggests land could become huge source of carbon to atmosphere • see http://www.grida.no/climate/ipcc_tar/wg1/121.htm Dr. Hassan J. Eghbali

9. Why vegetation? • Important part of terrestrial carbon cycle • Small amount BUT dynamic and of major importance for humans • vegetation type (classification) (various) • vegetation amount (various) • primary production (C-fixation, food) • SW absorption (various) • temperature (growth limitation, water) • structure/height (radiation interception, roughness - momentum transfer) Dr. Hassan J. Eghbali

10. Appropriate scales for monitoring • spatial: • global land surface: ~143 x 106 km • 1km data sets = ~143 x 106 pixels • GCM can currently deal with 0.25o - 0.1o grids (25-30km - 10km grid) • temporal: • depends on dynamics • 1 month sampling required e.g. for crops Dr. Hassan J. Eghbali

11. So…… • Terrestrial carbon cycle is global • Temporal dynamics from seconds to millenia • Primary impact on surface is vegetation / soil system • So need monitoring at large scales, regularly, and some way of monitoring vegetation…… • Hence remote sensing…. • in conjunction with in situ measurement and modelling Dr. Hassan J. Eghbali

12. Back to carbon cycle • Seen importance of vegetation • Can monitor from remote sensing using VIs (vegetation indices) for example • Relate to LAI (amount) and dynamics • BUT not directly measuring carbon at all…. • So how do we combine with other measures Dr. Hassan J. Eghbali

13. Vegetation and carbon • We can use complex models of carbon cycle • Driven by climate, land use, vegetation type and dynamics, soil etc. • Dynamic Global Vegetation Models (DGVMS) • Use EO data to provide…. • Land cover • Estimates of “phenology” veg. dynamics (e.g. LAI) • Gross and net primary productivity (GPP/NPP) Dr. Hassan J. Eghbali

14. Basic carbon flux equations • GPP = Gross Primary Production • Carbon acquired from photosynthesis • NPP = Net Primary Production • NPP = GPP – plant respiration • NEP = Net Ecosystem Production • NEP = NPP – soil respiration Dr. Hassan J. Eghbali

15. Basic carbon flux equations • Units: mass/area/time • e.g. g/m2/day or mol/m2/s • Sign: +ve = uptake • but not always! • GPP can only have one sign Dr. Hassan J. Eghbali

16. Dynamic Vegetation Models (DVMs) • Assess impact of changing climate and land use scenarios on surface vegetation at global scale • Couple with GCMs to provide predictive tool • Very broad assumptions about vegetation behaviour (type, dynamics) Dr. Hassan J. Eghbali

17. e.g. SDGVM (Sheffield Dynamic Global Veg. Model – Woodward et al.) Soil Moisture Phenology LAI Soil Moisture Transpiration Hydrology NPP Soil Moisture Max Evaporation H2O30 NPP Soil C & N Litter Century Growth Dr. Hassan J. Eghbali

18. Potentials for integrating EO data • Driving model • Vegetation dynamics i.e. phenology • Parameter/state initialisation • E.g. land cover and vegetation type • Comparison with model outputs • Compare NPP, GPP • Data assimilation • Update model estimates and recalculate Dr. Hassan J. Eghbali

19. Parameter initialisation: land cover EO derived land cover products are used to constrain the relative proportions of plant functional types that the model predicts grasses crops shrubs PFTs Land cover evergreen forest deciduous forest Dr. Hassan J. Eghbali

20. Day of year of green-up Parameter initialisation: phenology green-up occurs when the sum of growing degree days above some threshold temperature t is equal to n Spring crops Senescence Green up Dr. Hassan J. Eghbali

21. MODIS Phenology 2001 (Zhang et al., RSE) • Dynam. global veg. models driven by phenology • This phenol. Based on NDVI trajectory.... greenup maturity DOY 0 DOY 365 senescence dormancy Dr. Hassan J. Eghbali

22. Model/EO comparisons: GPP Simple models of carbon fluxes from EO data exist and thus provide a point of comparison between more complex models (e.g. SDGVM) and EO data e.g. for GPP = e.fAPAR.PAR e = photosynthetic efficiency of the canopy PAR = photosynthetically active radiation fAPAR = the fraction of PAR absorbed by the canopy (PAR.fAPAR=APAR) Dr. Hassan J. Eghbali

23. Model/EO comparisons: GPP Dr. Hassan J. Eghbali

24. Model/EO comparisons: NPP Dr. Hassan J. Eghbali

25. Summary: Current EO data • Use global capability of MODIS, MISR, AVHRR, SPOT-VGT...etc. • Estimate vegetation cover (LAI) • Dynamics (phenology, land use change etc.) • Productivity (NPP) • Disturbance (fire, deforestation etc.) • Compare with models and measurements • AND/OR use to constrain/drive models Dr. Hassan J. Eghbali

26. Dr. Hassan J. Eghbali

27. Future? OCO, NASA 2007 • Orbiting Carbon Observatory – measure global atmospheric columnar CO2 to 1ppm at 1x1 every 16-30 days • http://oco.jpl.nasa.gov/index.html Dr. Hassan J. Eghbali

28. Future? Carbon3D 2009? http://www.carbon3d.uni-jena.de/index.html Dr. Hassan J. Eghbali

29. Future? Carbon3D? 2009? Dr. Hassan J. Eghbali