1 / 51

Course Approval and Course Review & Revalidation for professional staff

Course Approval and Course Review & Revalidation for professional staff. Hayley Burns Head of Quality Unit. Purpose. To provide an overview of the following processes : Course Approval: C ourse development approval Course Validation Course Review & Revalidation

krysta
Download Presentation

Course Approval and Course Review & Revalidation for professional staff

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Course Approval and Course Review & Revalidation for professional staff Hayley Burns Head of Quality Unit

  2. Purpose To provide an overview of the following processes: • Course Approval: • Course development approval • Course Validation • Course Review & Revalidation • To introduce ICIS and its support of these processes

  3. Course Development Approval Purposes • Alignment with University strategic plan • Sound business case • Identify resource implications • Potential impact on other courses • Compliance with legislative requirements • Determine appropriate course validation route

  4. Course Development Approval Process • Course Development Team completes the ‘Curriculum Proposal Form’ (CPF) on ICIS • CPF submitted to Head of School • CPF submitted to Faculty Committee • If approved submitted for University peer review • Submitted to Deans and Executive for final approval to proceed to course validation

  5. Curriculum Proposal Form Sections • Course information • Market Research • The Course Costing Template [or Business Case] • Course Delivery • Course Structure • Course Exit Points • Subject Codes • Faculty Approval

  6. TheCPF on ICIS

  7. Course Validation: Event Types • Standalone validation event • University level • Faculty level • Paper-based level • Re/approval of a collaborative partner • Collaborative partner event • PSRB accreditation -- *Deadlines*

  8. Course Validation:Criteria For a course to be validated the following criteria must be met: • Curriculum • Learning, Teaching and Assessment • Admissions • Course Management • Resources • Implementation • Socially Inclusive Practice

  9. Course Validation: The Validation Document SECTION 1 Executive Summary

  10. Course Validation: The Validation Document (2) SECTION 2: PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT OF THE COURSE • CPF • Rationale for the proposal • Engagement with External and Internal Reference Points • Resources • Quality Assurance • Transitional Arrangements • Ethics

  11. Course Validation: The Validation Document (3) SECTION 3: THE COURSE SPECIFICATION • Course Information • Educational Aims and Learning Outcomes • Course Structure • Teaching and Assessment • Entry and Exit Requirements • Inclusive Curriculum Statement • Addendum for Delivery at a Collaborative Partner Organisation

  12. Course Validation: The Validation Document (4) • SECTION 4: COURSE STRUCTURE • Per each level of study: • Module Code • Module Title • Credits • Module Status • *ensure that at each level you have the correct number of credits. See Regulations for Taught Courses

  13. Course Validation: The Validation Document (5) SECTION 5: MODULE SPECIFICATIONS • Module Information • Module Criteria • Learning Outcomes • Assessment Matrix • Key Skills • Concise/Indicative Reading List

  14. Course Validation: The Validation Document (6) SECTION 6: SUPPORTING MATRICES • Learning Outcomes Matrix • Key Skills Matrix • Assessment Schedule

  15. Learning Outcomes Matrix

  16. Key Skills Matrix

  17. Assessment Schedule

  18. Course Validation: The Validation Document (7) • APPENDICES • External Examiner/Consultants’ Report(s) and Team’s response • Letters of support from employers • Staff CVs • Ethical Approval Forms • Applications for RTS

  19. Course Validation:Guidance Documents • QAA UK Quality Code • QAA docs: FHEQ, subject (and other) benchmarks, course specifications • USW Course Developer’s Guide • USW Guidelines for the Development of Foundation Degrees • USW Regulations for Taught Courses • USW Assessment Policy and Tariff • USW Learning, Teaching and Widening Access Strategy • USW CELT

  20. Course Validation: The Validation Document and ICIS

  21. Course Validation: The Process (1) Timescales

  22. Course Validation: The Process (2) • The Panel • The event • The outcomes • Conditions, requirements and recommendations • The report • Responding to conditions

  23. Course Validation: The Process (3) Paper-based validation • No panel meeting • External Advisor appointed • Sign off by FQAC Chair and Faculty Quality Manager

  24. Course Validation: The Report • Part A • Summary of information about the event • Recommendation to the FQAC/QAC • Conditions, requirements, recommendations, housekeeping, good practice • Part B • Validation Checklists • Main points of discussion • General points of note • Office Admin

  25. Course Approval:Summary • Course Development Approval and the CPF • Course Validation: • the criteria • the Validation Document • Guidance documents • the process • How ICIS supports these systems

  26. Course Review & Revalidation:Introduction • Assurance of maintenance of academic standards • Assurance of quality • Enhancement-focused • Opportunity for holistic and strategic thinking • Cumulative effect of change • Changes to internal and external environments • Changes to legislation • Single or multiple courses • Revalidation

  27. Process • Self-critical • Evidence-based • Building on strengths • Identifying and assessing risk • Highlighting areas for enhancement • Peer review: staff, students and externals • Designed to be developmental • Occurs every 6 years

  28. Panel Focus • Academic Standards • Quality of Learning Opportunities • Quality Management and Enhancement

  29. Schedule

  30. Preparation • Admin support provided by faculty to give advice and coordinate • Briefing meeting between FQM, Head of School and Course Leader(s) 6 months before the event: • Confirm the scope of the review • Provide an overview of the process • Identify a date and establish deadlines for submission of documentation • Guidance on developing the self-evaluation document • Discuss panel members and identify a reporting officer

  31. Panel • Chair • 2 or more external members • 2 or more internal members from a different faculty • Faculty Quality Manager • Student Union sabbatical officer or nominee • Reporting Officer

  32. Self-evaluation document:Part 1: Critical Review • Academic Standards • Quality of Learning Opportunities • The maintenance of Standards and Enhancement of Quality • Working with Others • Appendices • Mapping from old to new courses and modules • External Examiner/Consultant’s Report and Team’s response • Recruitment and conversion table • Statistics detailing student progression, outcomes and career destinations • Reports of accreditation events and details of any changes to professional body requirements

  33. Self-evaluation document: Part 2: Revalidation Document • SECTION 1: Planning and Development of the Course • Engagement with External and Internal Reference Points • Evidence of ethical consideration • Transitional Arrangements • SECTION 2: Course Specification • SECTION 3: Course Structure • SECTION 4: Module Specifications • SECTION 5: Supporting Matrices • APPENDICES

  34. Additional Documentation to be submitted with the SED • List of evidence • Course Handbooks • Student Data • External Examiner reports • Course annual monitoring report • Faculty annual monitoring report

  35. Additional Documentation to be available during the review • Course and module handbooks and any other relevant course documentation • Staff lists and a short profile • Course Board minutes • Module/course questionnaire summaries • Data, i.e. NSS satisfaction levels • Notes of course team meetings • Recent validation reports • Marketing materials

  36. The preparatory meeting • Chair, Head of School, Course Leader(s), FQM, Reporting Officer – 4 weeks before the event • Agree on key issues • Check which claims in the SED the panel are going to verify • Identify key members of staff who will attend meetings • Agree on sample of students’ work to be made available • Shape the overall agenda • Discuss arrangements for meeting students from collaborative partners

  37. The Event • 1 day long • Meetings with course and other staff, current and former students and other relevant stakeholders • Private meetings of the panel • Good practice and recommendations made • Report produced

More Related