Download
1 / 25
250 likes | 405 Views
Sober Thoughts About CCS for Retrofit or New Fossil Plants as a CO 2 Mitigation Measure from 2009-2029. Theresa Pugh Director, Environmental Services American Public Power Association EPA GHG Mitigation Measures Workshop Research Triangle Park, NC November 3, 2009.
E N D
Sober Thoughts About CCS for Retrofit or New Fossil Plants as a CO2 Mitigation Measure from 2009-2029 Theresa Pugh Director, Environmental Services American Public Power Association EPA GHG Mitigation Measures Workshop Research Triangle Park, NC November 3, 2009
Background on the American Public Power Association • APPA represents the interests of the 2,010 municipal or public power utilities, which provide electricity to residential, institutional, commercial and industrial customers. • Created in 1940 as a non-profit, non-partisan organization. • APPA’s purpose is to advance the public policy interests of its utility members and their consumers, and to provide member services to ensure adequate, reliable electricity at a reasonable price with the proper protection of the environment. • Public Power provides electricity for approximately 45 million Americans. • Public power utilities are in small, medium and large communities in 49 states (all but Hawaii). Seventy percent of public power systems are located in cities with populations of 10,000 or less. • Overall, public power accounts for about 16 percent of all kilowatt-hour sales to consumers. More than 90% of APPA member utilities meet the definition and qualify under Small Business Regulatory Enforcement and Fairness Act of 1996 (SBREFA). • Over half of APPA‘s members in the electricity sector burn coal, particularly in the Midwestern and Southeastern parts of the country.
Public Power Generation (MWH) by Energy Source – 2007 Source: Ventyx (formerly Energy Velocity) Database
Assessing Preliminary Guesses for Most & Least Favorable Locations for CCS • Most Favorable Locations • Deep Saline Aquifers • Proximity to CO2 pipelines • No or extremely low Seismic Potential • Proximity to Transmission • Proximity to Rail for Coal Transportation • Least Favorable Locations • Moderate or High levels of Seismic Potential • Unfavorable geology • Lack of Transmission and/or rail for coal transportation
Natural Gas Pipelines In case Fuel Switching to Natural Gas is the GHG Mitigation – see States with Interstate Pipeline Shortage
States with UIC Primacy: CO2 Injection Most Likely Under SDWA Source: http://www.epa.gov/ogwdw000/uic/primacy.html
“Best Guess” Timeline for Baseload (<600 MW) CCS Plant in Non-EOR/EGR States
Subsurface space required for only 40% of the Carbon Dioxide from a 300 MW power plant for one year: 2,750 Acres Source: J. Gledhill, Policy Navigation for APPA
Subsurface space required to sequester 40% of the Carbon Dioxide from approximately Nine 500 MW Plants over their 40-year lifetime: 2,580 square miles Roughly 1.5 times the size of Rhode Island Roughly half the size of Connecticut
EPRI “Prism” Analysis 2009 EPRI Prism analysis assumptions: • 90% CO2 capture for all new coal and natural gas combined-cycle plants built after 2020 • CCS retrofit for 60 gigawatts of existing coal generation at 90% capture efficiency For Retrofit of 60 GW @ 90% capture efficiency: • Approximately 77,400 square miles of subsurface space • Roughly the size of Nebraska or • Roughly twice the size of Maine PLUS area for 90% capture for all new fossil plants built after 2020. This is highly dependent upon geology or access to CO2 pipelines – all geology cannot promise sequestration for 50 years continuously OR
Retrofit of Existing Fossil Plants: How Realistic? • Parasitic Energy Losses • Capital Requirements for Older Plants • Pipelines • Dealing with Financing older plants • Lucky Location? • Lucky Geology • Proximity to USDW (drinking water source) and protective regulations
Dealing with approx. 30% Parasitic Energy Losses When Designing New Plants or Retrofitting Old Plants Parasitic Energy Loss refers to power lost from existing plant to administer the technologies related to CCS which are circled in the above diagram Source: Adapted from L.D. Carter, White Paper, "Retrofitting Carbon Capture Systems on Existing Coal-fired Power Plants," November 2007
Existing Fossil Generation & Optimal CCS Locations Without Any Drinking Water Resource Location Analysis Source of Map: NatCarb Atlas; Overlay: APPA Optimal Location Criteria Maps without CO2 pipelines Note: Optimal Locations are for new plants, not retrofit of existing power plants
APPA’s White Papers on CCS Available at http://www.appanet.org/files/htm/ccs.html • Marianne Horinko, "Carbon Capture and Sequestration Legal and Environmental Challenges Ahead," August 2007 • L.D. Carter, "Carbon Capture and Storage From Coal-based Power Plants: A White Paper on Technology for the American Public Power Association (APPA)," May 2007 • L.D. Carter, "Retrofitting Carbon Capture Systems on Existing Coal-fired Power Plants," November 2007 • Jonathan Gledhill, Policy Navigation Group; James Rollins, Policy Navigation Group; Theresa Pugh, APPA, White Paper, "Will Water Issues/Regulatory Capacity Allow or Prevent Geologic Sequestration for New Power Plants? A Review of the Underground Injection Control Program and Carbon Capture and Storage," November 2007 • Carbon Capture and Storage: Analysis of Potential Liabilities Associated with Groundwater Contamination Due to Geological Sequestration Operations, September 10, 2008Prepared by Fredric P. Andes and Kari A. Evans, members of the Barnes & Thornburg LLP Water Team, for the American Public Power Association (APPA) • Timothy Gablehouse, White Paper, "Geologic CO2 Issue Spotting and Analysis" July 2009
APPA’s CCS Information & Contacts Link to APPA’s White Papers on CCS: http://www.appanet.org/files/htm/ccs.html • For More Information, Contact: Theresa Pugh Director, Environmental Services 202-467-2943 TPugh@APPAnet.org • For Questions on CCS Maps, Contact: J.P. Blackford Environmental Services Engineer 202-467-2956 JPBlackford@APPAnet.org
