200 likes | 314 Views
Explore the history, rationale, major themes, key aspects, domains, workbooks, and roles in PSI. Understand how students progress at their own pace, engage in various tasks, and benefit from inclusive learning environments. Discover the pros and cons, and key goals in implementing PSI effectively.
E N D
Personalized System for Instruction “Students Progress as Fast as They Can, or as Slowly as They Need” By: Christina Thom and Michael Boyd
History of PSI • Program was developed by Fred Keller • Colleague of Skinner • Experimental behavioral physiologist • Also worked with Sherman (1974) • Known as “Goodbye Teacher!” (1968) • Also known as “Keller Plan”
Rationale • PSI is based on 4 features and it provides students with reinforcement • 1. The ability to view creative and interesting learning materials • 2. Regular tangible progress toward the course goals • 3. Immediate assessment of learning • 4. Individual attention from the instructor
Major Theme for PSI • Provides each student with a complete set of instructional materials. • Including- • Management information • Task presentations • Task structures • Learning activities • Error analyses • Assessments
PSI • Students proceed through a sequence of learning activities. • Complete each one to the stated performance criterion before moving on. • Students progress at their own pace.
Key Aspects to PSI • Go-at-your-own-pace • Unit-perfection requirement • Lectures and demonstrations for motivation • Stress on the written word for teacher-student communication • Tutoring/proctoring
Domains of PSI • A decidedly mastery in achievement based instructional model. • Learning domains- • First priority: Psychomotor learning • Second priority: Cognitive learning • Third priority: Affective learning
PSI Workbooks • Attendance policies • Class rules and disciplinary plan • Dressing-out policies • How to get and return equipment • Grading plan and applicable policies • Procedures for starting class • Learning tasks & criteria • Required readings • Progress charts
Teacher Skills • Planning • Time & Class Management • Task Presentation & Structure • Communication • Instructional Information • Review & Closure
Student Requirements • Reading • Technology • Personal Responsibility • Asking for Help
Teacher/Student Roles • Starting Class • Bringing equipment to class • Dispersing and returning equipment • Role call • Task presentation • Task structure • Assessment • Monitoring learning progress
Students work on their own • How does it work? • The student: • Tells the teacher which task they are ready to begin • Gets the materials & reviews the task • Reads or views a presentation of the task • Pictures, Videos • Practices the task
Tasks Included: • Readiness Drills • Comprehension Tasks • Criterion Tasks • Challenge Tasks • Quizzes • Games
PSI Provides Inclusion • Students work at their OWN pace • Nobody is “left behind” • Teacher-student interactions • Students can take as many attempts as needed to master the skill and pass the skill test
Goals • To provide individualized instruction • Allow each student to progress at his or her own pace • To encourage students to become independent learners • Students who need help get more interaction with teacher in order to improve
Pros of PSI • Students work at own pace • Social interactions with students & teachers • Assess themselves • Inclusion • Independent • More responsibility • Self Learning • Students can teach others
Cons of PSI • Lacks teacher demonstrations/presentations • Advanced students don’t get as much interaction with teacher • No lesson plans involved • Could cause chaos • Students could get off-task • Pressure on students • Competitiveness
Bibliography • http://www.edtech.vt.edu/edtech/id/models/psi.html • http://ww2.lafayette.edu/~allanr/concerns.html • http://ww2.lafayette.edu/~allanr/gallup.html • http://www.unh.edu/pff/seminar/methinstruct/psi.htm • http://www.unl.edu/speech/comm109/Files/Lectures/Day1/slide5.html • http://www.personal.psu.edu/students/w/x/wxh139/PSI.htm • “Instructional Models for Physical Education” Michael W. Metzler