1 / 28

Mechanics of the New Waiver Test

Mechanics of the New Waiver Test. Brett McCone Managing Director, KPMG LLP. Discussion Overview. Background Financial Targets Quality/Utilization Targets Proposed Terms Questions and Answers. Background.

kitty
Download Presentation

Mechanics of the New Waiver Test

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Mechanics of the New Waiver Test Brett McCone Managing Director, KPMG LLP

  2. Discussion Overview • Background • Financial Targets • Quality/Utilization Targets • Proposed Terms • Questions and Answers

  3. Background • On October 10, 2013, the State of Maryland applied to the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation (CMMI) for a demonstration project to improve outcomes, to enhance patient experience and to control costs. • The application was approved on January 10, 2014 • The resulting All-Payer Model (“the Model”) shifts the focus from historic price per encounter controls to a focus on overall revenue growth, including price and use.

  4. Background • Under the historic model, hospitals in the State of Maryland received a “waiver” from Medicare’s Inpatient and Outpatient Prospective Payments Systems (IPPS and OPPS) so as long as Maryland’s Medicare payment per admission grew below the national average. • The historic Waiver Test compared growth rates in Medicare payment per admission since the CY1980 base period (33 years!) • Price per Admission = Limited controls on utilization required under the test (at least on admisions) • No provision for outpatient price measurement • Maryland’s previous Waiver was codified in Section 1814(b)(3) of the Social Security Act (SSA)

  5. Background • The New Model includes the following provisions: • Annual all-payer, per capita, total hospital cost growth limited to 3.58% • Maryland’s Medicare per beneficiary total hospital cost growth rate must be below the national Medicare per beneficiary average, resulting in $330m of Medicare savings over five years • 80% of Maryland hospital revenue shifted into global payment models by year 5 • Maryland’s Medicare per beneficiary total cost growth rate cannot exceed the national average by more than 1 percentage point, and must be “break even” with the national average by year 4.

  6. Background • The Model includes the following provisions (cont.): • Maryland will reduce its 30-day Medicare readmission rate to the national average in five years • Annual Potentially Preventable Complication (PPC) reduction of 6.89%, for a cumulative 5 year reduction of 30%. • Maryland will propose a model extension at the start of Year 4 • Waives Section 1814(b)(3) of the SSA: Maryland’s historic Waiver Test • If the Model is not extended, or terminated early, Maryland hospitals will transition to the national Medicare payment systems. • …yes, we are working without a net.

  7. Financial Targets

  8. Financial Targets: All-Payer Test • All-payer per capita growth rate of 3.58% is the ten year average annual growth rate in Maryland Gross State Product (GSP) per capita (2002 – 2012) • 3.58% is fixed cap for years 1-3. In years 4 and 5, Maryland may adjust the all-payer cap for more recently available GSP data.

  9. Financial Targets: All-Payer Test • The all-payer per capita growth rate is expected to be calculated using: • Regulated, inpatient and outpatient hospital charges, from Maryland hospitals for Maryland residents receiving services. • Summarized from the new monthly hospital charge submissions for Maryland and non-Maryland residents • Population growth from the Maryland Department of Planning. • Interim population growth estimated from State projections

  10. Financial Targets: All-Payer Test • Illustrative example:

  11. Financial Targets: All-Payer Test • Compliance calculation – Example 1:

  12. Financial Targets: All-Payer Test • Compliance calculation – Example 2:

  13. Financial Targets: All-Payer Test • Points to consider • Timeliness and accuracy of monthly data reported • MD Resident vs. Non-MD Resident charges • Population estimates versus actual experience • Variable changes in rates (assessments, UCC, etc.) • Use of charges versus payments (Not a significant risk unless the differential changes) • Monitoring compared to other data sources (CRISP, etc.)

  14. Financial Targets: Medicare Test • From the October 11, 2013 Application: • “In addition to limiting…cost growth for all payers…Maryland will limit its Medicare per beneficiary total hospital cost (payment) growth…to produce $330m in Medicare savings over five years.” • “CMS will calculate Medicare savings by establishing a baseline that is the actual Medicare per beneficiary total hospital expenditures (payments) for Maryland Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries in 2013 trended forward by the national average growth rate in Medicare per beneficiary hospital expenditures (payments) to each year of the model and comparing Maryland’s annual Medicare per beneficiary hospital expenditures…”

  15. Financial Targets: Medicare Test • Baseline = CY2013 Medicare hospital payments for Maryland Medicare beneficiaries • Medicare hospital payments = Inpatient and outpatient hospital payments • Medicare claim type 60 (Inpatient) and claim type 40 (Outpatient), TOB = 11X • Includes: short term general hospitals, multiple hospital component in a medical complex, Alcohol/drug hospitals • Excludes reference lab (unregulated) • Excludes 72x bill type (ESRD clinics) • Refer to CMS application, page 53 for guidance • Maryland Medicare beneficiaries = All Maryland residents who are (Medicare) fee-for-service beneficiaries enrolled in Part A and/or Part B • Includes all geographic service locations: in-state and out-of-state

  16. Financial Targets: Medicare Test

  17. Financial Targets: Medicare Test • A CY2013 baseline will also be established for the national average • The savings test will compare the actual growth rate of the Maryland hospital payment per beneficiary versus the applied national (actual) growth rate to the baseline Maryland hospital payment per beneficiary. • The growth rate differential applied to the Maryland beneficiary total will compute the annual savings • The October 11, 2013 application reflects savings targets (p. 16) that assume no savings in year 1 and approximately 0.5% below the national trend in years 2-5. • The assumptions and charts on the next several pages reflect illustrative, example calculations. The figures are NOT EXACT and are examples only.

  18. Financial Targets: Medicare Test • Assumptions: • Maryland Medicare beneficiaries remain fixed for all periods at 845,000 • Table 2.8 at http://cms.gov/Research-Statistics-Data-and-Systems/Statistics-Trends-and-Reports/MedicareMedicaidStatSupp/2013.html • Example Maryland per beneficiary base = $6,545 • Source: 10/11/13 CMS application • Fixes national payment per beneficiary growth at 1.0% per year (general assumption for illustrative purposes) • Scenarios: • “A” Targeted growth rates to achieve CMS application annual targets • “B” Straight line savings beginning in CY2015 to achieve $330m savings target • “C” Straight line savings beginning in CY2014 to achieve $330m savings target • “D” Straight line savings beginning in CY2014 with a fixed 0.5% savings per year

  19. Scenario “A” Targeted growth rates to achieve CMS application annual targets

  20. Scenario “B” Straight line savings beginning in CY2015 to achieve $330m savings target

  21. Scenario “C” Straight line savings beginning in CY2014 to achieve $330m savings target

  22. Scenario “D” Straight line savings beginning in CY2014 with a fixed 0.5% savings per year

  23. Financial Targets: Medicare Test • Points to consider: • Uncertainty of national growth rate • Impact of the ACA (coverage expansion, etc.) • Localized clinical epidemic • Inclusion of unregulated services in the hospital measure • MD vs. national percentage of Medicare Part B to Medicare Part A beneficiaries • Relationship of All Payer ceiling to Medicare savings

  24. Quality Targets: Readmissions • Maryland maintains its waiver from the CMS Hospital Readmission Reduction Program. • To do so, Maryland will reduce 30-day Medicare readmission rate to the national average in five years • Most recent Medicare readmission rates: • Maryland = 20.5% vs. national = 18.5% • Based on the most recent data, a 0.5 percentage point reduction in the rate each year of the agreement is required • Appendix B of the application (p. 55) outlines the readmission calculation • Monthly readmissions rate = Readmissions during the 30 day period / index admissions that occurred during the month • Readmission occurs if first day of a stay occurred within 30 days of the last service date of an index admission

  25. Quality Targets: MHAC/PPC • Maryland maintains its waiver from the CMS Hospital Acquired Conditions Program. • Maryland will achieve an annual, aggregate reduction of 6.89% in 65 Potentially Preventable Complications (PPCs) • PPCs, not MHACs • 30% reduction over 5 years

  26. Proposed Terms • During the five year period, there are specific events that will lead to further review by CMS and potentially early termination. (Application p. 17) They are: • Failure to achieve (Medicare) savings for two consecutive years • Failure to meet the cumulative (Medicare) savings target by $100m or more at any point during the life of the model • Annual growth in Maryland Medicare per beneficiary total cost that is more than 1% point greater than the national average • Determination of significant quality of care deterioration • Should any of these occur, CMS will provide notice to Maryland. • Maryland has 90 days to respond, with CMS having 90 days to accept the response or request a corrective action plan, due in 30 days. • If the corrective action plan is not implemented successfully within 1 year of notification, CMS may terminate the agreement. • See flowchart in Application, page 18.

  27. Questions and Answers

  28. Thank You Brett McCone Managing Director, KPMG LLP 410 949 8538 bmccone@kpmg.com

More Related