1 / 15

John N. Gardner Senior Fellow

“The First-Year Experience’s First 25 Years—the Jury is In, But Out on the Next: You Can Determine the Verdict”. John N. Gardner Senior Fellow National Resource Center for The First-Year Experience and Students in Transition University of South Carolina

kitra
Download Presentation

John N. Gardner Senior Fellow

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. “The First-Year Experience’s First 25 Years—the Jury is In, But Out on the Next: You Can Determine the Verdict” John N. Gardner Senior Fellow National Resource Center for The First-Year Experience and Students in Transition University of South Carolina 25th Anniversary First-Year Experience Conference and Gala Celebration Atlanta, Georgia, February 28, 2006

  2. Outline • Audience analysis: why do people come? • Reflections on the beginnings • The 800 pound gorilla in the room: Retention • What have we accomplished? • What's missing? • We are victims of our own success • Some questions that need to be asked about the first year instead of “what's our retention rate?” • It all comes down to philosophy: some models • A time for resolutions

  3. Audience Analysis Why do people come (98, 726 previously)? What explains the enduring popularity of this gathering?

  4. Demographic Analysis • Full-time faculty? • Academic administrators? • Student affairs professionals? • Other specialties of higher ed professionals? • International guests? • For-profit institutions? • Two-year colleges? • Private, liberal arts colleges? • Regional, comprehensive public universities? • Research universities? • Other special purpose institutions? • First timers? • How many have heard me talk before? • How many have heard this talk before?!

  5. Reflections on the beginnings: the historical epoch produces..... • a student riot • a course • a conference • a conference series • a center

  6. Original Purposes of University 101 • teach students to love the University • teach roles and purposes • form new relationships • create support group • use helping services • join organizations • increase student/faculty contact • provide opportunity to teach course you always wanted to teach • antidote to large lecture classes • humanize large university culture • provide faculty development • create partnership of faculty and student affairs

  7. What’s Missing Here? • RETENTION • Retention: the 800 Pound Gorilla in the Room • From aspirational ideals to a business model: are we better served?

  8. What have we accomplished? • first year taken more seriously • FYE in the lexicon • CAO's leading the charge • widespread adoption of “programs” • birth of a new profession • A focus of many organizations • Press coverage • A new language • FYE conferences and Center have flourished • Other providers emerge • A new field of scholarly research and dissemination • A marriage with shameless commerce • Moving beyond to other "transitions" • A newer focus on engagement • A marriage with accountability movement and reaccreditation (http://www.ncahlc.org/index.php?%20option=com_content&task=view&%20id=97&Itemid=86) • A set of aspirational standards developed (www.fyfoundations.org) • Becomes an international movement

  9. What’s Missing? • Insufficient engagement • High rate DWFI courses • Still too much attrition • Tenuous nature of FYE programs and leadership • "Program" nature of response vs comprehensive institutional • Under resourced--still the cash cow model • A mantra that is not academically compelling • Competition for resources in an indifferent culture • Getting the students' attention

  10. Victims of our own Success “Programs” trumped over philosophy and institution wide approaches

  11. Ask These Questions Instead • How could you consider the first year as a unit of analysis? • Do you have a grand design? • Do you have an explicit philosophy? • How is your philosophy connected to institutional mission? • Is anyone in charge? • What about levels of coordination, integration, coherency? • How are you organized for student "transitions"? • What are your goals for student learning? How well are you achieving these? • What is vs what should be the common experience for ALL students? • How can you make faculty engagement a higher priority? • How do you provide engagement with diverse ideas and people? • How do you promote understanding of roles and purposes? • What about assessment: what do you know and what do you do with what you know?

  12. Philosophy: Some Examples (see handout)

  13. Looking towards the next 25 years: my three big bets: • Continue to strengthen USC’s National Resource Center setting of the reform agenda • Campus wide self studies for planning and action (www.fyfoundations.org) • Linking with reaccredidation (http://www.ncahlc.org/index.php?%20option=com_content&task=view&%20id=97&Itemid=86)

  14. What else would I like to see? • Reducing our tolerance for failure • Declaring war on math failure • Taking more responsibility for student learning vs blaming the victim • Redesign introductory courses • Special attention to high DWFI rate courses • Focus on the students we have instead of "better" students • Intentional actions to develop the next generation of leaders • Tackle the problem of quality in the first-year seminar

  15. A Time for Resolutions • Please share a few of yours • MINE: TO BE RETAINED! TO PERSIST! • YOU WILL BRING IN THE VERDICT ON THE NEXT 25 YEARS! BEST WISHES ON THAT

More Related