- By
**kirti** - Follow User

- 193 Views
- Uploaded on

Download Presentation
## PowerPoint Slideshow about 'Motion' - kirti

**An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation**

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript

What if you only had one eye?

Depth perception is possible by moving eye

Parallax

Motion parallax – apparent displacement of object viewed along two different lines of sight

http://www.infovis.net/imagenes/T1_N144_A6_DifMotion.gif

Head movements for depth perception

Some animals move their heads to generate parallax

pigeon

praying mantis

http://pinknpurplelizard.files.wordpress.com/2008/06/pigeon1.jpg

http://www.animalwebguide.com/Praying-Mantis.htm

Motion field and optical flow

- Motion field – The actual 3D motion projected onto image plane
- Optical flow – The “apparent” motion of the brightness pattern in an image(sometimes called optic flow)

When are the two different?

Barber pole illusion

Television / movies

(no motion field)

Rotating ping-pong ball

(no optical flow)

http://homepages.inf.ed.ac.uk/rbf/CVonline/LOCAL_COPIES/OWENS/LECT12/node4.html

Perhaps an aperture problem discussed later.

Optical flow breakdown

* From Marc Pollefeys COMP 256 2003

Another illusion

from G. Bradski, CS223B

Motion field (cont.)

velocity of projection:

Expanding yields:

Note that rotation

gives no depth

information

Optical Flow Assumptions:Brightness Constancy

* Slide from Michael Black, CS143 2003

Optical Flow Assumptions:

* Slide from Michael Black, CS143 2003

Optical Flow Assumptions:

* Slide from Michael Black, CS143 2003

Optical flow

Image at time t

Image at time t + Dt

Brightness constancy assumption:

Taylor series expansion:

Putting together yields:

Optical flow (cont.)

From previous slide:

Divide both sides by Dt and take the limit:

or

standard

optical flow

equation

More compactly,

Aperture problem

From previous slide:

Key idea:

Any function looks linear through small `aperture’

This is one equation, two unknowns!

(Underconstrained problem)

true motion

gradient

another possible

answer

I(x,y,t+Dt)=x

isophote

I(x,y,t)=xisophote

We can only compute component of motion in direction of gradient:

Two approaches to overcome aperture problem

- Horn-Schunck (1980)
- Assume neighboring pixels are similar
- Add regularization term to enforce smoothness
- Compute (u,v) for every pixel in image
- Dense optical flow
- Lucas-Kanade (1981)
- Assume neighboring pixels are same
- Use additional equations to solve for motion of pixel
- Compute (u,v) for a small number of pixels (features); each feature treated independently of other features
- Sparse optical flow

Lucas-Kanade

Recall scalar equation with two unknowns:

Assume neighboring pixels have same motion:

where N is the number of pixels in the window

or

Can solve this directly using least squares, or …

RGB version

- For color images, we can get more equations by using all color channels
- E.g., for 7x7 window we have 49*3=147 equations!

Improving accuracy

It-1(x,y)

It-1(x,y)

- Recall our small motion assumption

- This is not exact
- To do better, we need to add higher order terms back in:

It-1(x,y)

- This is a polynomial root finding problem

- Can solve using Newton’s method
- Also known as Newton-Raphson method
- Lucas-Kanade method does one iteration of Newton’s method
- Better results are obtained via more iterations

* From Khurram Hassan-Shafique CAP5415 Computer Vision 2003

Iterative Lucas-Kanade Algorithm

- Solve 2x2 equation to get motion for each pixel
- Shift second image using estimated motion(Use interpolation to improve accuracy)
- Repeat until convergence

shift

image2

Lucas-Kanade Algorithm

solving 2x2 equationis easy

Linear interpolation

f(x0+2)

f(x0-1)

f(x0)

f(x0+1)

1D function

x0-1

x0

x

x0+1

x0+2

0≤a<1

f(x) ≈ f(x0) + (x-x0) ( f(x0+1) – f(x0) )

= f(x0) + a ( f(x0+1) – f(x0) )

= (1 –a) f(x0) + a f(x0+1)

Bilinear interpolation

x0-1

x0

x

x0+1

x0+2

2D function

y0-1

a

f00

f10

y0

b

y

y0+1

f01

f11

y0+2

f(x0,y) ≈ (1-b)f00 + bf01

f(x0+1,y) ≈ (1-b)f10 + bf11

f(x,y) ≈ (1-a) [(1-b)f00 + bf01] + a[(1-b)f10 + bf11]

= (1-a)(1-b)f00 + (1-a)bf01 + a(1-b)f10 + abf11

Bilinear interpolation

x0-1

x0

x

x0+1

x0+2

2D function

y0-1

a

f00

f10

y0

b

y

y0+1

f01

f11

y0+2

f(x,y0) ≈ (1-a)f00 + af10

f(x,y0+1) ≈ (1-a)f01 + af11

f(x,y) ≈ (1-b) [(1-a)f00 + af10] + b[(1-a)f01 + af11]

= (1-b)(1-a)f00 + (1-b)af10 + b(1-a)f01 + baf11

same

result

Bilinear interpolation

- Simply compute double weighted average of four nearest pixels
- Be careful to handle boundaries correctly

a

b

How does Lucas-Kanade work?

- Recall Newton’s method(or Newton-Raphson)
- To find root of function, use first-order approximation
- Start with initial guess
- Iterate:
- Use derivative to find root, under assumption that function is linear
- Result become new estimate for next iteration

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Newton-Raphson_method

Because no change in brightness with time

Ix

v

It

Optical Flow: 1D CaseBrightness Constancy Assumption:

from G. Bradski, CS223B

Spatial derivative

Assumptions:

- Brightness constancy
- Small motion

from G. Bradski, CS223B

Temporal derivative at 2nd iteration

Can keep the same estimate for spatial derivative

Tracking in the 1D case:Iterating helps refining the velocity vector

Converges in about 5 iterations

from G. Bradski, CS223B

From 1D to 2D tracking

We get at most “Normal Flow” – with one point we can only detect movement

perpendicular to the brightness gradient. Solution is to take a patch of pixels

around the pixel of interest.

* Slide from Michael Black, CS143 2003

When does Lucas-Kanade work?

- ATA must be invertible
- In real world, all matrices are invertible
- Instead, we must ensure that ATA is well-conditioned (not close to singular):
- Both eigenvalues are large
- Ratio of eigenvalues lmax / lmin is not too large

Eigenvalues of Hessian

- Z is gradient covariance matrix
- Related to autocorrelation of I(Moravec interest operator)
- Sometimes called Hessian
- Recall from PCA:
- (Square root of) eigenvalues give length of best fitting ellipse
- Large eigenvalues means large gradient vectors
- Small ratio means information in all directions

Iy

Ix

Finding good features

Iy

Three cases:

- l1 and l2 small

Not enough texture for tracking

- l1 large, l2 small

On intensity edge

Aperture problem: Only motion perpendicular to edge can be found

- l1 and l2 largeGood feature to track

Ix

Iy

Ix

Iy

M. Pollefeys, http://www.cs.unc.edu/Research/vision/comp256fall03/

Note: Even though tracking is a two-frame problem, we can determine good features from only one frame

Finding good features

- In practice, eigenvalues cannot be too large,b/c image values range from [0,255]
- Solution: Threshold minimum eigenvalue (Shi and Tomasi 1994)
- An alternative approach (Harris and Stephens 1987):
- Note that det(Z) = l1l2 and trace(Z) = l1+ l1
- Use det(Z) – k trace(Z)2, where k=0.04 The second term reduces effect of having a small eigenvalue with a large dominant eigenvalue (known as Harris corner detector or Plessey operator)
- Another alternative: det(Z) / trace(Z) = 1 / (1/l1 + 1/l2)

Good features code

- % Harris Corner detector - by Kashif Shahzad
- sigma=2; thresh=0.1; sze=11; disp=0;
- % Derivative masks
- dy = [-1 0 1; -1 0 1; -1 0 1];
- dx = dy'; %dx is the transpose matrix of dy
- % Ix and Iy are the horizontal and vertical edges of image
- Ix = conv2(bw, dx, 'same');
- Iy = conv2(bw, dy, 'same');
- % Calculating the gradient of the image Ix and Iy
- g = fspecial('gaussian',max(1,fix(6*sigma)), sigma);
- Ix2 = conv2(Ix.^2, g, 'same'); % Smoothed squared image derivatives
- Iy2 = conv2(Iy.^2, g, 'same');
- Ixy = conv2(Ix.*Iy, g, 'same');
- % My preferred measure according to research paper
- cornerness = (Ix2.*Iy2 - Ixy.^2)./(Ix2 + Iy2 + eps);
- % We should perform nonmaximal suppression and threshold
- mx = ordfilt2(cornerness,sze^2,ones(sze)); % Grey-scale dilate
- cornerness = (cornerness==mx)&(cornerness>thresh); % Find maxima
- [rws,cols] = find(cornerness); % Find row,col coords.
- clf ; imshow(bw);
- hold on;
- p=[cols rws];
- plot(p(:,1),p(:,2),'or');
- title('\bf Harris Corners')

from Sebastian Thrun, CS223B Computer Vision, Winter 2005

Example (s=0.1)

from Sebastian Thrun, CS223B Computer Vision, Winter 2005

Example (s=0.01)

from Sebastian Thrun, CS223B Computer Vision, Winter 2005

Example (s=0.001)

from Sebastian Thrun, CS223B Computer Vision, Winter 2005

Feature tracking

- Identify features and track them over video
- Usually use a few hundred features
- When many features have been lost, renew feature detection
- Assume small difference between frames
- Potential large difference overall
- Two problems:
- Motion between frames may be large
- Translation assumption is fine between consecutive frames, but long periods of time introduce deformations

Revisiting the small motion assumption

- Is this motion small enough?
- Probably not—it’s much larger than one pixel (2nd order terms dominate)
- How might we solve this problem?

* From Khurram Hassan-Shafique CAP5415 Computer Vision 2003

Reduce the resolution!

* From Khurram Hassan-Shafique CAP5415 Computer Vision 2003

u=2.5 pixels

u=5 pixels

u=10 pixels

image It-1

image It-1

image I

image I

Gaussian pyramid of image It-1

Gaussian pyramid of image I

Coarse-to-fine optical flow estimationslides from

Bradsky and Thrun

run iterative L-K

.

.

.

image J

image It-1

image I

image I

Gaussian pyramid of image It-1

Gaussian pyramid of image I

Coarse-to-fine optical flow estimationslides from

Bradsky and Thrun

run iterative L-K

Alternative derivation

- Compute translation assuming it is small

differentiate:

- Affine is also possible, but a bit harder (6x6 in stead of 2x2)

M. Pollefeys, http://www.cs.unc.edu/Research/vision/comp256fall03/

Example

Simple displacement is sufficient between consecutive frames, but not to compare to reference template

M. Pollefeys, http://www.cs.unc.edu/Research/vision/comp256fall03/

Example

M. Pollefeys, http://www.cs.unc.edu/Research/vision/comp256fall03/

Synthetic example

M. Pollefeys, http://www.cs.unc.edu/Research/vision/comp256fall03/

Good features to keep tracking

Perform affine alignment between first and last frame

Stop tracking features with too large errors

M. Pollefeys, http://www.cs.unc.edu/Research/vision/comp256fall03/

Errors in Lucas-Kanade

What are the potential causes of errors in this procedure?

- Suppose ATA is easily invertible
- Suppose there is not much noise in the image

- When our assumptions are violated
- Brightness constancy is not satisfied
- The motion is not small
- A point does not move like its neighbors
- window size is too large
- what is the ideal window size?

* From Khurram Hassan-Shafique CAP5415 Computer Vision 2003

Feature matching vs. tracking

Image-to-image correspondences are key to passive triangulation-based 3D reconstruction

Extract features independently and then match by comparing descriptors

Extract features in first images and then try to find same feature back in next view

What is a good feature?

M. Pollefeys, http://www.cs.unc.edu/Research/vision/comp256fall03/

Horn-Schunck

- Dense optical flow
- Minimizewhere

(data)

(smoothness)

Note: We want to find u and v to minimize the integral, but u and v are themselves functions of x and y!

Calculus of variations

- A function maps values to real numbers
- To find the value that minimizes a function, use calculus
- A functional maps functions to real numbers
- To find the function that minimizes a functional, use calculus of variations

Calculus of variations

independent

variable

dependent

variable

explicitfunction

Integral

is stationary where

Euler-Lagrange equations

C.o.v. applied to o.f.

explicit function

independent variables

dependent variables

Euler-Lagrange equations

C.o.v. applied to o.f. (cont.)

Plug back in:

where

Rearrange:

Laplacian

Approximate:

where

(difference of Gaussians)

constant

mean

What if l=0?

C.o.v. applied to o.f. (cont.)

Solve equation:

This is a pair of equations for each pixel. The combined system of equations is 2N x 2N, where N is the number of pixels in the image.

Because it is a sparse matrix, iterative methods (Jacobi iterations, Gauss-Seidel, successive over-relaxation) are more appropriate.

Iterate:

where

Stationary iterative methods

Problem is to solve sparse linear system:

matrix = (diagonal) – (lower) – (upper)

Jacobi method (simply solve for element, using existing estimates):

Gauss-Seidel is “sloppy Jacobi” (use updates as soon as they are available):

Successive over relaxation (SOR) speeds convergence:

G-S iterate

w=1 means Gauss-Seidel

Horn-Schunck Algorithm

note that this l

is defined differently

www.cs.unc.edu/~sud/courses/256/optical_flow.ppt

Spatiotemporal volumes

http://homepages.inf.ed.ac.uk/rbf/CVonline/LOCAL_COPIES/COLLINS/TobyCollins.pdf

Layers

- Wang and Adelson

Download Presentation

Connecting to Server..