slide1 n.
Skip this Video
Loading SlideShow in 5 Seconds..
Pearce & Robinson, 10 th ed. PowerPoint Presentation
Download Presentation
Pearce & Robinson, 10 th ed.

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 17

Pearce & Robinson, 10 th ed. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

  • Uploaded on

Pearce & Robinson, 10 th ed. Multi-business Strategy. Chapter 9. Learning Objectives. Understand the portfolio approach to strategic analysis and choice in multibusiness companies.

I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
Download Presentation

Pearce & Robinson, 10 th ed.

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
learning objectives
Learning Objectives
  • Understand the portfolio approach to strategic analysis and choice in multibusiness companies.
  • Understand and use three different portfolio approaches to conduct strategic analysis and choice in multibusiness companies
  • Identify the limitations and weaknesses of the various portfolio approaches
  • Understand the synergy approach to strategic analysis and choice in multibusiness companies
  • Evaluate the parent company role in strategic analysis and choice to determine whether and how it adds tangible value in a multibusiness company
the portfolio approach
The Portfolio Approach
  • The portfolio approach is a historical starting point for strategic analysis and choice in multibusiness firms
  • Boston Consulting Group (BCG) pioneered an approach called portfolio techniques that attempted to help managers

“balance” the flow of cash

resources among their various

businesses while identifying their

basic strategic purpose within the overall portfolio

bcg s strategic environments matrix1
BCG’s Strategic Environments Matrix
  • Volume businesses are those that have few sources of advantage, but the size is large—typically the result of scale economies
  • Stalemate businesses have few sources of advantage, with most of those small
  • Fragmented businesses have many sources of advantage, but they are all small
  • Specialization businesses have many sources of advantage and find those advantages potentially sizable
limitations of portfolio approach
Limitations of Portfolio Approach
  • It does not address how value is being created across business units
  • Truly accurate measurement for matrix classification was not as easy as the matrices portrayed
  • The underlying assumption about the relationship between market share and profitability varied across industries and market segments
  • The limited strategic options came to be seen more as basic strategic missions
  • It ignored capital raised in capital markets
  • It typically failed to compare the competitive advantage a business received from being owned by a particular company with the costs of owning it
the synergy approach leveraging core competencies
The Synergy Approach: Leveraging Core Competencies
  • Opportunities to build value via diversification, integration, or joint venture strategies are usually found in market-related, operations-related, and management activities
  • Strategic analysis is concerned with whether or not the potential competitive advantages expected to arise from each value opportunity have materialized
  • The most compelling reason companies should diversify can be found in situations where core competencies—key value-building skills—can be leveraged with other products or into markets that are not a part of where they were created
the synergy approach
The Synergy Approach
  • Each core competency should provide a relevant competitive advantage to the intended businesses
  • Businesses in the portfolio should be related in ways that make the company’s core competencies beneficial
  • Any combination of competencies must be unique or difficult to recreate
the corporate parent role can it add tangible value
The Corporate Parent Role:Can It Add Tangible Value?

Realizing synergies from shared capabilities and core competencies is a key way value is added in multibusiness companies.

1. Research suggests that figuring out if the synergies are real and, if so, how to capture those synergies is most effectively accomplished by business unit managers, not the corporate parent.

2. How can the corporate parent add value to its businesses in a multibusiness company?

the parenting framework
The Parenting Framework
  • The parenting framework perspective sees multibusiness companies as creating value by

influencing—or parenting—their businesses

  • The best parent companies create more value than any of their rivals do or would if they owned the same businesses
  • To add value, a parent must improve its businesses
10 sources of parenting opportunities
10 Sources of Parenting Opportunities
  • Size & Age
  • Management
  • Business Definition
  • Predictable Errors
  • Linkages
  • Common Capabilities
  • Specialized Expertise
  • External Relations
  • Major Decisions
  • Major Changes
the patching approach
The Patching Approach
  • Patching is the process by which corporate executives routinely remap businesses to match rapidly changing market opportunities
  • It can take the form of adding, splitting, transferring, exiting, or combining chunks of businesses
  • Patching is not seen as critical in stable, unchanging markets
  • When markets are turbulent and rapidly changing, patching is seen as critical to the creation of economic value in a multibusiness company
proponents of patching
Proponents of Patching
  • View traditional corporate strategy as creating defensible strategic positions for business units by acquiring or building valuable assets, wisely allocating resources to them, and weaving synergies among them
  • In volatile markets, they argue, this traditional approach results in business units with strategies that are quickly outdated and competitive advantages rarely sustained beyond a few years
  • As a result, strategic analysis should center on strategic processes more than strategic positioning
  • In these volatile markets, patchers’ strategic analysis focuses on making quick, small, frequent changes in parts of businesses and organizational processes