1 / 19

MANAGING THE MULTINATIONAL CORPORATION

MANAGING THE MULTINATIONAL CORPORATION. Professor Stephen Young Strathclyde International Business Unit Strathclyde Business School 7 th May 2004. Foreign Direct Investment Worldwide, 2002. World FDI Stock: $ 7.1 trillion 10-fold increase since 1980

kiri
Download Presentation

MANAGING THE MULTINATIONAL CORPORATION

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. MANAGING THE MULTINATIONAL CORPORATION Professor Stephen Young Strathclyde International Business Unit Strathclyde Business School 7th May 2004

  2. Foreign Direct Investment Worldwide, 2002 • World FDI Stock: $ 7.1 trillion • 10-fold increase since 1980 • 64,000 MNEs controlled 870,000 foreign affiliates • Numbers employed by foreign affiliates – 53 million • Value added of foreign affiliates $ 3.4 trillion, about 10% of world GDP. • One third of world exports are intra-MNE. Source: UNCTAD (2003)

  3. Definitions Multinational Enterprise • Owns (in whole or in part), controls and manages value-adding activities in more than one country. • An orchestrator of a set of geographically dispersed but interdependent assets. Micromultinational (mMNE) • SME that controls and manages value added activities through constellations and investment modes in more than one country.

  4. What’s Different about Multinational Management? • Multiple operating environments • Diverse pattern of consumer preferences, channels, legal frameworks, etc. • Political demands and risks • Need to mesh corporate strategy with host country policies.

  5. What’s Different (Continued)? • Global competitive game • Multiple markets, new strategic options • Currency fluctuation and exchange risk • Economic performance measured in multiple currencies • Organizational complexity and diversity • Need to manage complex demands across barriers of distance, time, language and culture.

  6. Transition from International Multinational Global Transnational • Can involve major shifts in: • Marketing, manufacturing, distribution, R&D • strategies and location • Financing • Human resource policies and practices • Management structures • Management information systems • Management compensation

  7. Evolving Mentality: International to Transnational • International Perspective: Domestic company with foreign appendages; opportunistic FDI. • Multinational perspective: Overseas markets important; managed as a federation of quasi-autonomous subsidiaries. • Global Perspective: World viewed as a single unit of analysis. • Transnational Perspective: Respond to global and host country pressures simultaneously.

  8. Transnational Global High International exporter Multidomestic Low High Low Need for localization International Corporate Strategy Model Need for global integration

  9. Telecommunications High Razor blades Batteries Consumer electronics NEED FOR GLOBAL INTEGRATION Insurance Drink Food Detergent Corrugated cardboard Low Low High NEED FOR NATIONAL RESPONSIVENESS Integration-Responsiveness Grid

  10. Wal-Mart: Key to Global SuccessPresentation by Vice-President, International Division, 16th February 2000 Benefits from globalization: • Global sourcing • Knowledge transfer e.g. glazed donuts • Global branding Strategy • Learn globally, act locally.

  11. A Final Word: Risk of Globalization Glaucoma • Blindness to everything but global forces • Short-sightedness to localizing forces “As the 1990s were drawing to a close, the world had changed course, and Coca-Cola had not. We were operating as a big, slow, insulated, sometimes even insensitive “global” company; and we were doing it in an era when nimbleness, speed, transparency and local sensitivity had become absolutely essential.” Douglas Daft, CEO, Coca-Cola, March 2000

  12. Evolution of Multinational Organization Structures • Hierarchical Structures • Export Department • International Division • Global structures (Product / Geography / Function / Customer) • Matrix structures • Heterarchical Structures

  13. Function cost centres Area profit centres Business profit centres Business 1 Business 2 Business 3 Business 4 Business Managers Business 5 Business 6 Asia Australia Business 7 Cost centres Inter America Business 8 Europe United States Business 9 Cost centres Mktg. Mfg. Res. IS&D Eval/ Cont. Functional professionalism Resource Managers MultinationalMatrix Structure

  14. HQ S2 S1 S4 S3 H1 H2 H5 H4 H3 Multinational Hierarchy Multinational Heterarchy Hedlund; Bartlett & Ghoshal

  15. Multinational Expansion Strategies (a) Host-market production (b) Product-specialisation for a global or regional market (c) Production / process-specialisation for a global or regional market

  16. The Determinants of Subsidiary Roles and Mandates • What is a mandate? • Full-scope and limited scope mandates • Key success factors associated with attaining mandates • Existence of champions • Subsidiary competence • Stage in product life cycle, etc. • Are mandates allocated or earned?

  17. Early Model of Subsidiary Roles / Mandates(White & Poynter, 1984) • Miniature Replica – Subsidiaries produce and market some of the parent product lines in the host country. • Rationalized Manufacturer – Subsidiaries produce component parts or products for regional or global markets (usually within the MNE). • Product Specialist – Subsidiary develops, produces and markets a limited product line for regional / global markets; World product Mandate. • Strategic Independent – Autonomous subsidiary.

  18. Head Office Assignment Decision made by head office managers regarding the allocation of roles/activities to the subsidiary Subsidiary’s Role Measured in terms of the specific business, or elements of the business, which the subsidiary undertakes and for which it has responsibility Subsidiary Choice Decisions by subsidiary managers regarding the roles/activities undertaken by the subsidiary Local Environment Determination Influence of environmental factors on decisions taken by head office and/or subsidiary managers regarding the roles/activities undertaken by subsidiary Organizing Framework for Subsidiary Development Parent Company Devt Internal Devt Host Country Devt

  19. Unleash Innovation in Foreign Subsidiaries Four possible approaches • Give seed money to subsidiaries • Use formal requests for proposals • Encourage subsidiaries to be incubators • Build international networks Source: Birkinshaw & Hood, Harvard Business Review, March 2001

More Related