1 / 32

The Coeval Growth of Black Holes and their host Spheriods

The Coeval Growth of Black Holes and their host Spheriods. X.Y.Xia Tianjin Normal University, China Collaborators: C.N.Hao, S.Mao, Z.G.Deng &H.Wu. Motivation. The tight correlation between Mbh and the mass of host spheriod Kommendy&Gebhardt 2001, Merritt & Ferrarese 2001

kira
Download Presentation

The Coeval Growth of Black Holes and their host Spheriods

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. The Coeval Growth of Black Holes and their host Spheriods X.Y.Xia Tianjin Normal University, China Collaborators: C.N.Hao, S.Mao, Z.G.Deng &H.Wu

  2. Motivation • The tight correlation between Mbh and the mass of host spheriodKommendy&Gebhardt 2001, Merritt & Ferrarese 2001 • The Star Formation History and Distribution of QSOs Heckman et al. 2004; Springel et al. • How such correlation arise?Does it always exist? the growing process of Mbh and spheriod Different SFR/Mdot for different stages of galaxy assemply The SFR/Mdot about 1000 for local narrow emission line AGN Heckman & Kauffmann 2004 • The SFR/Mdot about several hundred for IR QSOsHao et al. 2005 • The SFR/Mdot >1000 for SMGs Alexander et al. 2005 • The SFR/Mdot less than 10 for typical QSOs

  3. Motivation • The tight correlation between Mbh and the mass of host spheriodKommendy&Gebhardt 2001, Merritt & Ferrarese 2001 • The Star Formation History and Distribution of QSOs Heckman et al. 2004; Springel et al. • How such correlation arise?Does it always exist? the growing process of Mbh and spheriod Different SFR/Mdot for different stages of galaxy assemply The SFR/Mdot about 1000 for local narrow emission line AGN Heckman & Kauffmann 2004 • The SFR/Mdot about several hundred for IR QSOsHao et al. 2005 • The SFR/Mdot >1000 for SMGs Alexander et al. 2005 • The SFR/Mdot less than 10 for typical QSOs

  4. 1 SFR >100 PG QSOs IR QSOs ULIRGs Mdot <1 Thansition phase tens >1000 SFR FIR super- Luminous QSOs High-z SMGs Typical QSOs Mdot 0.2 <1

  5. Transition stage from merger to ellipticals

  6. IR QSOs are in transitionary stage • Strong FeII emitters • High Eddington ratio • Steep x-ray slop at one extreme end of Eigenvecgtor 1 and they are young QSOs • Starburst

  7. The starburst and central AGN give main contributions at different waveband • By comparing optical and IR QSOs sample, It is possible to separate the contributions • Determining SFR and Mdot

  8. IR QSOs at Low redshift (Hao at al. 2005) • IR QSO sample Zheng et al. (2002) (2)The optically-selected QSO sample PG QSOs , BG92 (1992), Haas et al. (2003) • NLS1 sample Wang & Lu (2001)

  9. Sample Selection • QDOTIRAS galaxy sample(Lawrence et al. 1999) • 1 JyULIRGs sample(Kim & Sanders 1998) • IRAS-ROSATcross-identification sample(Moran et al. 1996) • A sample of 31 IR QSOs (z<0.35),takes a fraction • of about 25% in local universe. Based on the sample, statistical results should be representative.

  10. High-z QSOs • Rest Frame Submillimeter Detected QSOs (57) • Typical QSOs (95)

  11. Sample • Optically selected QSOs at redshift about 4 with 1.2mm observation, Omont et al. (2001) • Optically selected QSOs at redshift about 4 with 1.2mm observation, Carilli et al. (2001) • Optically selected QSOs at redshift about 2 with 1.2mm observation, Omont et al. (2003) • X-ray absorbed and submillimeter detected QSOs Stevens et al. (2005) • CO/HCN detected QSOs Carrilli et al. (2002, 2005)

  12. T=41K, ß=1.95

  13. Parameters estimates at high z SFR:Monochromatic luminosity at 60m the monochromatic luminosity at 60m from the flux density at 1.2mm by assuming the rest-frame FIR SED can be described by a greybody spectrum with the dust temperature of 41K and the dust emissivity of 1.95 Priddey & McMahon (2001). Mdot: Bolometric luminosity Vestergaard (2004 )

  14. Accretion rate Star formation rate

  15. 1 SFR >100 PG QSOs IR QSOs ULIRGs Mdot <1 Thansition phase 10 >1000 SFR FIR super- Luminous QSOs High-z SMGs Typical QSOs Mdot 0.2 <1

  16. Summary • Typical QSOs at both low and high redshift) are satisfied the same Lfir and Lbol relation • The FIR excess of low and high redshift QSOs originates from starburst • The SFR/Mdot for low-z IR QSOs and high-z submillimeter detected QSOs is several hundred • The Mbh-M* relation could be built up during this short period (107to108 yr)

  17. Thank You

More Related