1 / 15

BMEidea Presentation February 25, 2010

Andrea Castañeda, Daniel Miranda, Jennifer Wang, Kevin Yeroushalmi, Joseph Youssef Course Advisors: Gordana Vunjak-Novakovic, Keith Yeager, Aaron Kyle, Sarindr Bhumiratana, Matthew Bouchard Project Advisor: Professor Clark Hung Consultants: Professor Gerard Ateshian, Yukkee Cheung.

kipp
Download Presentation

BMEidea Presentation February 25, 2010

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Andrea Castañeda, Daniel Miranda, Jennifer Wang, Kevin Yeroushalmi, Joseph Youssef Course Advisors: Gordana Vunjak-Novakovic, Keith Yeager, Aaron Kyle, Sarindr Bhumiratana, Matthew Bouchard Project Advisor: Professor Clark Hung Consultants: Professor Gerard Ateshian, Yukkee Cheung BMEidea PresentationFebruary 25, 2010

  2. Overview • Review of design motivation and ideas • Our prototype: • (Current) Features • (Future) Versions • What sets us apart from the competition (ideally) • Testing/ proof of principle • Tremors induce appropriate muscle response • Oscilloscope readings • Literature findings • Sensors detect abnormal arm movement • LEDs • Next steps

  3. Problem & Clinical Motivation • Target: 5.5Million Americans • Problem: Intention Tremors in the arm • Clinical Motivation: Solution to perform daily tasks • Eating • Drinking • Writing

  4. Objective Statement • Mission: Produce a non-invasive motion dampening device that efficiently attenuates tremor and provides comfort, stability, and peace of mind • Device will not inhibit range of motion • Adaptable “Smart” Solution

  5. The Competition • Currently available alternatives include: • Task-Specific Devices • Neater-Eater • Thomas Steady Arm • Drug Therapies • Surgical Procedures • Drawbacks / Shortcomings: • Expensive • Cumbersome • Aesthetically Unappealing

  6. Our Design • Distinguishing Features: • Feedback • Inconspicuous • Lightweight • Affordable

  7. Stead-Ease Concept Showcase: I

  8. Stead-Ease Concept Showcase: II

  9. Technical Feasibility • Qualitative comparisons • Quantitative comparisons: • Accelerometer voltage output • Assess comfort through surveys

  10. Regulatory Pathway • Relatively unhindered by regulatory committees • No FDA Approval • No Pre-Market Approval (PMA) • IRB approval

  11. Manufacturing Costs Arduino Rotary Damper Accelerometers Actuator Magnetic Encoder Pressure Sensor

  12. Sales Strategy • Online Retail • 30 Day Money Back Guarantee • Warranty/Servicing • Retail Price: $1000

  13. Summary • Innovative concept • Improve customer quality of life • Versatile design with widespread application

  14. Acknowledgments Technical Advisors Keith Yeager Aaron Kyle Gerard Ateshian, PhD Sarindr Bhumiratana Matthew Bouchard Yukkee Cheung Faculty Advisors • Gordana Vunjak-Novakovic, PhD • Clark T. Hung, PhD • Elizabeth Hillman, PhD Clinical Advisors • Paul Greene, MD • Joseph Mayer, MD

  15. Questions?

More Related