1 / 1

Introduction

Evaluation of a Biological Control Agent for Control of Root-Knot Nematode, Meloidogyne marylandi , on Turfgrass Rachel A. McGregor and Travis R. Faske Department of Environmental and Agricultural Management, Tarleton State University, Stephenville, TX.

king
Download Presentation

Introduction

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Evaluation of a Biological Control Agent for Control of Root-Knot Nematode, Meloidogynemarylandi, on TurfgrassRachel A. McGregor and Travis R. FaskeDepartment of Environmental and Agricultural Management, Tarleton State University, Stephenville, TX Turfgrass color, density, and root quality were similar among treatments at all sample dates in this study. All treatments averaged 6.8 quality index for color and density; however a quality index above 8 was observed for all plots after fertilization and aeration. Furthermore, these observations were similar to those collected with a chlorophyll meter. The average chlorophyll index increased from 199.2 (before treatment) to 453.0 (90 days after treatment), which was consistent with fertilization and turfgrass management. The average root quality rating was similar among treatments (Fig. 4). Numerically, turfgrasstreated with Nortica at all rates averaged longer root length than water control. Meloidogynemarylandi, root-knot nematode, is a widely distributed pest of turfgrass in Texas (Starr et al., 2007). This root-knot nematode is frequently associated with turfgrass exhibiting various symptoms of decline and poor growth (Fig. 1). Female root-knot nematodes are located on turfgrass roots which can exhibit slight galling (Fig. 2). Despite its distribution and importance on turfgrass few studies have investigated practices to manage this nematode species. Bacillus firmus, a biological control agent,has been reported to reduce root-knot nematode populations (Giannakou and Prophetou-Athanasiadou, 2004); however, no study has evaluated the effects of Bacillus firmuson M. marylandi. Introduction Figure 2. Root-knot nematode females (yellow arrows) on bermudagrass root. Results The initial population density of root-knot nematode (RKN) was similar among plots and averaged 192.9 eggs/g of root. Thus, all plots had a moderate population density of RKN on turfgrass. No phytotoxicity was observed on plots treated with Nortica or DiTera. Nematode reproduction increased 90 days after treatment among all treatments; however no difference was observed among treatments (Fig. 3). Numerically, turfgrasstreated with Nortica at 90 lb/A and DiTera at 50 lb/A had a lower reproduction index than water control. Figure 1. Decline and poor growth caused by root-knot nematode on a golf course putting green in Stephenville, Texas. Objectives • Evaluate B. firmusto control M. marylandion turfgrass • 2. Determine the effect of B. firmuson turfgrassquality Figure 4. Length of root development treated with two biological control agents90 days after treatment. Methods and Materials Conclusion This study was conducted on a golf course putting green (cv. Mini Verde, bermudagrass) naturally infested with root-knot nematodes. Based on esterase and malic dehydrogenase isoenzymatic pattern this species was identified as M. marylandi. Nortica(Bayer Environmental Sciences), B. firmus was applied at 0, 50, 75, 90 lb/acre, and Myrotheciumverrucaria, (DiTera DF, Valent Biosciences Corporation) applied at 50 lb/acre served as the industry standard. Each treatment was replicated four times in a randomized complete block design. Each treatment was applied in late March to a 25 sq. ft. (5 ft x 5 ft) plot and irrigated with 0.25 in of water. Reproduction was determined based on eggs produced on turfgrass roots. Turf response to treatment was based on a turf color rating (chlorophyll meter) turf quality rating (1=poor to 9=excellent based on color and density) and root quality (quantitative measurement, root length, and weight). Nematode population density and turfgrass quality varied in response to all rates of Nortica in this study. Further investigation will continue in the fall to assess B. firmusfor control of M. marylandiand determine effects on turfgrass quality. Literature Cited Figure 3. Reproduction of M. marylandion bermudagrass treated with two biological control agents. Reproduction index was calculated by dividing the final population (Pf= 90 days after treatment) by the initial population (Pi= before treatment) of nematodes sampled. Starr, J. L., Ong, K. L., Huddleston, M., and Handoo, Z. A. 2007. Control of Meloidogynemarylandi on bermudagrass. Nematropica 37:43-49. Giannakou, I. O. and Prophetou-Athanasiadou, D. 2004. A novel non-chemical nematicide for the control of root-knot nematodes. Applied Soil Ecology 26: 69–79.

More Related