40 likes | 136 Views
Explore ecosystem accounting for wetlands including landscape potential, biodiversity, and restoration costs at various scales for sustainable management. Utilizing data and criteria to assess ecological potential and inform policy and actions.
E N D
Migratory Birds Flyways, Wetlands & Bird Flu Prevention Doñana, Spain: Water, Wetland & Strawberries Amvrakikos, Greece: Wetland management, Water & Fish Accounting for ecosystem costs and benefits at different scales… Global scale National & regional government, European market Action level, local scale
Markets need accounts, regulations [= control] Land ecosystems are spatially distributed => grid data [e.g. 1 km2] Globally, change matters [degradation or improvement of ecosystem functioning and attached cost], not the value of the stock Global multicriteria rating based on a small number of ecological potential [derived from ecosystem accounts]: Landscape ecological potential [LEP] HANPP Biodiversity rarefaction Exergy loss [river basins] Dependance from external inputs [material/energy, footprint] losses/gains of “points of ecological potential” computation of restoration costs [needed for compensating losses // or accumulated by gains of points] Rating can be detailed as necessary for the policy [national, regional] and action scales [local, business] Simplified ecosystem accounts
Example of a first candidate: LEP Corine land cover map (derived from satellite images) Green Background Landscape Index (derived from CLC) Naturilis (derived from Natura2000 & CDDA) Effective Mesh Size (MEFF, derived from TeleAtlas and CLC) net Landscape Ecological Potential (nLEP) 2000, by 1km² grid cell nLEP 2000 by NUTS 2/3
LEP, state and change by 1 km2 grid Natural Park of Camargue (France) 1990 Change 1990-2000 LEAC/ Landscape Ecological Potential1990-2000, 1km² grid (Source: Ecosystem Accounting for Mediterranean Wetlands, an EEA feasibility study for TEEB)