1 / 17

Federal Policy Update 2008

Federal Policy Update 2008. Dr. Sheryl Abshire Chair - Consortium for School Networking (CoSN) CTO – Calcasieu Parish Public Schools Lake Charles, La. Agenda. Status of Federal Funding for Ed Tech No Child Left Behind Reauthorization E-Rate and Related Issues.

Download Presentation

Federal Policy Update 2008

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. FederalPolicy Update 2008 Dr. Sheryl Abshire Chair - Consortium for School Networking (CoSN) CTO – Calcasieu Parish Public Schools Lake Charles, La

  2. Agenda • Status of Federal Funding for Ed Tech • No Child Left Behind Reauthorization • E-Rate and Related Issues

  3. Current Federal Funding – EETT • Block grant to states; states distribute 95% $ to districts: ½ by formula and ½ by competition • Funds can be used for any technology purpose • 25% of both competitive and formula funds must be used for professional development

  4. EETT Funding in Crisis EETT FUNDING HISTORY • In NCLB, authorized at $1 B • 2004: $691M • 2005: $496 M • 2006: $272.3 M • 2007: $272.3 M • 2008: $267.4M • 2009: ?

  5. State Impact of EETT Cuts State FY02 FY05 FY08 (est.) Alabama $8.8 $7.3 $4.0 California $85.1 $65.7 $30.5 Louisiana $11.5M $10.5M $5.8M Florida $28.3 $22.9 $12.2 Georgia $18.6 $15.2 $8.3 Illinois $25.5 $19.9 $10.2 Michigan $24.3 $15.9 $9.7 New York $60.9 $45.3 $21.7 Ohio $19.2 $14.2 $9.5 Pennsylvania $22.8 $17.7 $10.5 Texas $50.7 $44.1 $23.9

  6. FY09 EETT Funding in Crisis STATUS • Administration has proposed – for the 4th year in a row – to eliminate EETT • House Appropriations Chair Obey has threatened to pass a CR and let next President determine FY09 spending • Still must make every effort to get good marks for EETT in draft spending bills. • House to mark-up education spending bill in June.

  7. Proposed NCLB Funding FY07 FY08 FY09 Admin Title I $12.8B $13.9B $14.3B Title IIA $2.9B $2.9B $2.84B EETT $272M $267.4M $0 Reading $1.029B $393M $1B Data $24.8M $48M $100M

  8. NCLB Reauthorization • No Full Reauthorization Bills Introduced To Date • Last Year: House discussion draft circulated and lambasted by all sides. • Big Issues: Alternate AYP measures, assisting particular subgroups, funding and merit pay • This Year: Any action will be in Senate but Senate action unlikely given lack of time and HELP Chairman Kennedy’s illness.

  9. Ed Tech in NCLB Reauthorization • ATTAIN Act (HR 2449 and S. 1996) • House: Sponsored by Reps. Roybal-Allard (D-CA), Hinojosa (D-TX), Biggert (R-IL) and Kind (D-WI) • Senate: Sponsored by Sens. Bingaman (D-NM), Burr (R-NC) and Murray (D-WA) • ATTAIN Revamps EETT by Focusing Funds on: • Professional Development • Systemic Reform Programs that Use Technology • Schools in need of improvement and LEP and Special Needs students • ATTAIN in House and (smaller) Senate Drafts!

  10. Ed Tech Bills Compared

  11. Ed Tech Bills Compared

  12. E-Rate – The Basics • Discounts to public/private schools and libraries on telecommunications, Internet access and internal connections • Discounts range between 20% and 90% • $2.25 billion per year • Internal connections prioritized based on need • Paid for by USF – assessment on interstate and international revenues of common carriers • ALABAMA: $350 million from E-Rate in 10 years

  13. E-Rate Updates • Funding: $2.9 B available in Program Year 2007 but still only at 80% for internal connections. Reasons: • Loading up during 2/5 on years • 50% more admin appeals being granted

  14. E-Rate Updates II • Proposal to Change Payments • Schools gain access to funding as soon as FCDL received • Draw down on bank accounts as needed • No invoicing and BEAR forms after but schools must keep receipts • Problems: waste, fraud and abuse detection hindered; record-keeping foisted entirely on schools; and private school participation impacted

  15. E-Rate Updates III • FCC hands down E-Rate order on performance measures • E-Rate success NOT to be measured against academic measures but based on connectivity measures – as CoSN/ISTE sought. • Order mandates that USAC be measured on its performance (application processing/appeals) – as CoSN/ISTE sought. • Order extends E-Rate requirements on document retention and debarment to other USF programs – as CoSN/ISTE sought.

  16. E-Rate Continuing Challenges Anti Deficiency Act • ADA: FCC cannot obligate funds unless sufficient dollars in accounts to cover obligations • 2004: FCC deems E-Rate subject to ADA and deems funding notifications to be obligations. • August-November 2004: USAC shuts down program • 2005, 2006, 2007 and 2008: Temporary exemptions • Next exemption expires December 31, 2008 • Permanent Exemption Legislation: S. 609 and HR 278

  17. E-Rate Continuing Challenges II • Internet Safety • Deleting Online Predators Act • Would Require E-Rate Recipients to Block Access to Chat Rooms/Social Networking Sites • Issues: Local control; education vs. mandates; unintended consequences • Protecting Children in 21st Century Act • Guts DOPA: E-Rate recipients certify that they are educating students re. social networking/chat rooms/cyberbullying. • Just passed Senate!

More Related