the insurance industry and the financial crisis l.
Download
Skip this Video
Loading SlideShow in 5 Seconds..
The insurance industry and the financial crisis PowerPoint Presentation
Download Presentation
The insurance industry and the financial crisis

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 18

The insurance industry and the financial crisis - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 185 Views
  • Uploaded on

The insurance industry and the financial crisis. London Insurance Institute London, 17 March 2010 Prof. Karel VAN HULLE Head of Insurance and Pensions. Financial crisis and insurance. Insurers went through the crisis relatively unharmed

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'The insurance industry and the financial crisis' - kieve


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
the insurance industry and the financial crisis

The insurance industry and the financial crisis

London Insurance InstituteLondon, 17 March 2010

Prof. Karel VAN HULLEHead of Insurance and Pensions

financial crisis and insurance
Financial crisis and insurance
  • Insurers went through the crisis relatively unharmed
  • Strong cash flows, long-term liability driven investment policies, stable customer base
  • Insurers that had problems were involved in extensive banking or credit operations
  • Lack of proper risk management has been an issue in a number of cases
actions undertaken
Actions undertaken
  • Close co-operation in the context of G20, Financial Stability Board and Joint Forum
  • ECOFIN action plan
  • Proposal to improve the supervisory architecture in the EU
  • Question to all parties concerned whether Solvency II needed to be changed
recapitulation why solvency ii
Recapitulation: Why Solvency II?
  • Present capital requirements are not sufficiently risk sensitive
  • Group supervision is not dealt with in its own right
  • More efficient capital allocation would allow insurers to take on more risks
  • Supervisory convergence must be strengthened
solvency ii 3 pillars and a roof

Group supervision

& cross-sectoral convergence

Groups are recognised as an economic entity

=> supervision on a consolidated basis

(diversification benefits, group risks)

Pillar 1: quantitative requirements

1. Harmonised calculation of technical provisions

2. "Prudent person" approach to investments instead of current quantitative restrictions

3. Two capital requirements: the Solvency Capital Requirement (SCR) and the Minimum Capital Requirement (MCR)

Pillar 2: qualitative requirements and supervision

1. Enhanced governance, internal control, risk management and own risk and solvency assessment (ORSA)

2. Strengthened supervisory review, harmonised supervisory standards and practices

Pillar 3: prudential reporting and public disclosure

1. Common supervisory reporting

2. Public disclosure of the financial condition and solvency report

(market discipline through transparency)

Solvency II: 3 pillars and a roof
solvency ii timetable for 2007 2012
Solvency II Timetable for 2007-2012

2012

2011

2007

2008

2009

2010

2006

Directive development (Commission)

Directive adoption

(Council & Parliament)

Implementation

(Member states)

CEIOPS work on technical advice necessary for implementing measures / supervisory convergence / preparation for implementation / training & development

Commission preparatory work implementing measures

Adoption of implementing measures

July 2007

Solvency II Proposal - Adopted Directive published in December 2009

October 2012

Solvency II enters into force

QIS 2

QIS 3

QIS 4

QIS 5

solvency ii and financial crisis
Solvency II and financial crisis
  • Stakeholders confirm that Solvency II is needed because of higher level of harmonisation and risk orientation
  • CEIOPS publishes paper « lessons learned from the financial crisis » in March 2009
  • Text of Framework Directive is amended in order to introduce provisions dealing with financial crisis situations
changes in solvency ii framework directive
Changes in Solvency II Framework Directive
  • Supervisory authorities shall give proper consideration to financial stability and potential procyclical effects of their actions
  • Symmetric adjustment mechanism in equity risk sub-module
  • Extension of recovery period in the event of exceptional fall in financial markets
adaptations at levels 2 and 3
Adaptations at Levels 2 and 3
  • Pillar 1: Quality of the capital, alternative risk transfer, market risk, correlation between risks
  • Pillar 2: Reliance on CRA’s, liquidity risk, internal models
  • Pillar 3: possible procyclical effects of market value based disclosures
what remains to be done on sii
What remains to be done on SII?
  • Commission drafting of implementing measures based upon CEIOPS’ advice but in close co-operation with MS and stakeholders
  • QIS 5 will be the ultimate test of the standard formula
  • Implementing measures to be accompanied by impact assessment
timing for sii
Timing for SII
  • Commission Proposal (s): end 2010
  • Stakeholder meeting QIS 5: 30 April 2010
  • Public Hearing: 4 May 2010
  • Final technical specifications: June 2010
  • Start of QIS 5: August 2010
  • Adoption of implementing measures: end 2011
supervisory architecture
Supervisory architecture
  • De Larosière expert group delivers report end February 2009
  • Proposal to keep supervision at national level but with strengthening of EU level
  • Policy proposals by EC end May 2009
  • European Council agrees: 19 June 2009
  • EC Legislative proposals: September 2009
two pillars of new supervisory structure
Two pillars of new supervisory structure
  • European Systemic Risk Board (ESRB); and
  • European System of Financial Supervisors (ESFS).
esfs structure
ESFS structure

Steering Committee (replacing JCFC)

European Supervisory Authorities:

European Banking Authority

European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority

European Securities Markets Authority

National Supervisors

eiopa
EIOPA
  • Binding technical standards: common rulebook
  • Binding mediation: conflicts between supervisors, application of EU rules
  • Group supervision: observer in colleges
  • Crisis-management
  • Full-time Chairman and more resources
state of progress
State of progress
  • Political agreement in Council in December 2009
  • Vote in EP expected in June/July 2010
  • To be followed by amendments in sectoral legislation
  • Changes in insurance legislation expected some time in Spring 2010
  • EIOPA to start: 1 January 2011
concluding remarks
Concluding remarks
  • Need to strike the right balance in Solvency II between prudence and efficient allocation of capital
  • Solvency II will seriously upgrade the level of supervisory convergence
  • The creation of EIOPA will lead to further professionalisation of supervision