1 / 21

Dineke Feenstra & Joost Hutsebaut September 2009, Ghent

TRAP: A long term outcome and process study of a residential treatment for treatment refractory adolescents with personality disorders. Dineke Feenstra & Joost Hutsebaut September 2009, Ghent. PTC De Viersprong.

kieve
Download Presentation

Dineke Feenstra & Joost Hutsebaut September 2009, Ghent

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. TRAP:A long term outcome and process study of a residential treatment for treatment refractory adolescents with personality disorders Dineke Feenstra & Joost Hutsebaut September 2009, Ghent

  2. PTC De Viersprong • PTC De Viersprong is a third line mental health setting. It offers specialized assessment and treatment programs (outpatient, day hospital and inpatient) for adolescents and adults with personality disorders • De Viersprong has its own research department, the VISPD: Viersprong Institute for Studies on Personality Disorders

  3. Research group • Joost Hutsebaut • Dineke Feenstra • Annelies Laurenssen • Jan van Busschbach • Roel Verheul • Els Havermans

  4. Background:Outcome research in adolescents • Progress in child- and adolescent psychotherapy outcome research: • Psychotherapy is an effective treatment for children and adolescents (mood-, anxiety-, eating-, and conduct disorders) (Kazdin & Weisz, 2004). • Improvement in methodological qualities of research (more controlled studies, treatment protocols etc.) (Kazdin, 2002).

  5. Background:Outcome research in adolescents • Limitations in child- and adolescent psychotherapy outcome research: • Uncovered area: personality disorders (PD) in adolescents • Lack of developmental sensitivity: treatment models as well as outcome instruments are little developmentally sensitive • Review of 25 empirically supported psychotherapies in adolescents (Weisz & Hawley, 2002) • 14 effective treatments • 7 adult models, 6 child models, 1 adolescent model (MST)

  6. Background: Treatment of PD in adolescents • Adolescents are left out of multidisciplinary guidelines for the treatment of PD’s • No evidence based models for the treatment of adolescent PD • Few handbooks: Kernberg, 2000 (psychodynamic approach); Bleiberg, 2001 (relational approach rooted in attachment theory); Miller et al., 2007 (DBT); Freeman & Reinecke, 2007

  7. Background:Outcome studies adolescents with PD • Chanen et al., 2008: • RCT Cognitive Analytic Therapy (CAT) versus manualised good clinical care • Rathus & Miller, 2002: • Quasi experimental investigation of an adaptation of Dialectical Behavior Therapy (DBT)

  8. TRAP-study: Rationale • Rationale: • First: little is known about severe personality disorders in adolescents • Second: little is known about intensive inpatient treatment (for personality disturbed adolescents) • Third: we know little about developmental sensitive outcomes of psychotherapy for adolescents

  9. TRAP-study:Objectives • Objective 1: treatment outcome • Objective 2: prediction of treatment outcome • Objective 3: relation between relational changes and relapse

  10. TRAP-study:Design • Naturalistic study • Include 130 adolescents with personality pathology who are admitted to the inpatient unit of the youth department of De Viersprong (duration of treatment is 1 year) • Measurements at start of treatment, 6, 12 and 24 months after the start of treatment

  11. TRAP-study:Instruments

  12. TRAP-study:Sample charachteristics • Sample characteristics (baseline): • N = 133 • Gender = 113 female (85%); 20 male (15%) • Mean age = 16.55 (range 14-19) • Mean IQ = 104 (range 78-137)

  13. TRAP-study:Sample characteristics • Sample characteristics (baseline): • Axis I: 100 adolescents (75.19%) had at least 1 Axis I disorder * Other axis I disorders were diagnosed in less than 10% of the adolescents.

  14. TRAP-study:Sample characteristics • Sample characteristics (baseline): • Axis II: 63 adolescents (47.37%) had at least 1 Axis II personality disorder

  15. TRAP-study:Drop out • Dropping out of the treatment:

  16. TRAP-study:Results symptom level (BSI) • Brief symptom inventory (BSI)

  17. TRAP-study:Results personality functioning (SIPP)

  18. TRAP-study:Results other outcome measures (self report)

  19. TRAP-study:Strengths & limitations • Strengths: • Use of developmentally sensitive (and positive) outcome instruments • Several measuring points • Including severely personality disturbed adolescents • Use of semi structured interviews to assess both Axis I and Axis II disorders • Limitations: • No control group • High level of drop-out • Underrepresentation of boys • No treatment manual

  20. TRAP-study • Conclusion: • A group of severely disturbed adolescents underwent an intensive inpatient treatment program. A large group of these adolescents dropped out of treatment. The adolescents that stayed in treatment showed improvement in symptom level, personality functioning and developmental tasks (f.e. school). • This is a first step (pilot study) in investigating the uncovered area of adolescents with severe personality disorders. Further research is needed, investigating manualized treatment programs with methodologically stronger research designs.

  21. Contact • Website: • www.deviersprong.nl • www.vispd.nl • Email: • dineke.feenstra@deviersprong.nl • joost.hutsebaut@deviersprong.nl

More Related