Sea Power and Maritime Affairs. Lesson 22: The Navy at War in the 1990s, 1991-2000. Learning Objectives. The student will understand the history and build-up to NATO involvement in Bosnia and Kosovo.
Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.
Lesson 22: The Navy at War in the 1990s, 1991-2000
force to oppose these states.
assistance of U.S. and U.N.
troops for over a decade.
NATO military operations largely limited to enforcing
U.N. no fly zone. Becomes largest ongoing military operation over Europe since WWII.
The point of NATO air power was to coerce Serbs without engaging a ground force. How could targets be effectively identified in future wars with similar missions without ground element support?
involved a valuable
new precision weapon:
- Reported in Muslim world as a “holocaust”
- No ground observers to direct targeting
- U.S./NATO policy barring all troops might be blamed for tactical failure of air attacks (a mistake NOT repeated in Afghanistan)
- Center of gravity attacks?
- Was there a way to force the enemy to move in a way to produce lucrative targets?
-Here the KLA functions as a coalition force.
-Neither NATO nor KLA had much chance of winning without the other.
Lt. Kara Spears 'Revlon' Hultgreen (1965-1994)
9. October 2000. Attack on the USS Cole.
10. February 2001. Greenville incident.
11. April 2001. EP-3 incident.
Admiral Jeremy M. Boorda, U.S. Navy
USS Cole damage