1 / 9

Problem - Approach

Rapid Assessment and Characterization of Environmental Risks ( RACER) - A New Software Tool - Gary M. Marsh, Ph.D. Michael Cunningham, M.S. D epartment of Biostatistics Graduate School of Public Health Pittsburgh Environmental Summit - April 18, 2007. Problem - Approach.

khuong
Download Presentation

Problem - Approach

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Rapid Assessment and Characterization of Environmental Risks (RACER) - A New Software Tool -Gary M. Marsh, Ph.D.Michael Cunningham, M.S.Department of BiostatisticsGraduate School of Public HealthPittsburgh Environmental Summit - April 18, 2007

  2. Problem - Approach • Under what conditions and to what extent can we detect elevations in the background rate of disease that were truly caused by an environmental exposure? • To provide a web-based software tool that will enable public health officials and others to evaluate feasibility of conducting health tracking activities or targeted investigations

  3. Feasibility Factors (Statistical) • The background rate of the disease under study (i.e., the rate in the unexposed population) • The overall size of the potentially exposed population • The proportion of the population that is exposed to varying levels of the environmental hazard • The relative potencies of the various levels of exposure to elevate the background rate of disease • Observation time of exposed subpopulations and latency period of disease under study

  4. Conceptual Model: Airborne Exposure to Point Source with Proportion of Subpopulations Exposed Downwind of Source

  5. Example 1: 80% Statistical Power to Detect 1.3-Fold Excess Reached in 2.5 Years

  6. Example 2: Power as Function of MDRR and Time Period

  7. Example 3: Power as a Function of % Exposed (ew) and Time (years) - Comparison of 4 Plots RRee = 1.2 RRee = 1.4 RRee = 1.6 RRee = 1.8

  8. Possible Future RACER Enhancements • Indirect and direct standardization procedures • Extend standardization to multiple factors • Account for geographic population mobility • Time dependent exposure-elevated relative risks • Account for latency/incubation period of health endpoints • Statistical methods for spatial (clustered) data

  9. Acknowledgements The investigators wish to thank the following groups for their support and guidance: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Environmental Public Health Tracking Program Grant # 5U19EH000103-02 (Academic Partners for Excellence in Environmental Public Health Tracking) University of Pittsburgh Academic Consortium for Excellence in Environmental Public Health Tracking (UPACE-EPHT) (a collaboration with Drexel University)

More Related