1 / 17

Beginning Decade #2…

Beginning Decade #2…. StateNets 2004 Doug Heacock, Executive Director Kansas Research and Education Network. Overview. The first decade The KanREN backbone network The KanREN consortium, governance Fiscal growth and funding model The next decade: collaboration & Kan-ed. The first decade.

kevyn
Download Presentation

Beginning Decade #2…

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Beginning Decade #2… StateNets 2004 Doug Heacock, Executive Director Kansas Research and Education Network

  2. Overview • The first decade • The KanREN backbone network • The KanREN consortium, governance • Fiscal growth and funding model • The next decade: collaboration & Kan-ed

  3. The first decade • Beginnings in NSF Connections program, 1993 • Small staff—2 to 3 FTE until 1999 • Relatively simple institutional needs to meet • Internet access (4.5 – 21 Mbps) • Low-bandwidth connectivity between member institutions (56k-T1 backbone) • Internet 2 via GPN

  4. The first decade • Staff expansion in 2000-2003 • 4 to 7 FTE • Approaching “critical mass” • Institutional needs growing more complex • QoS, IP multicast, growing security issues • Outgrowing our “host family” • KanREN leaves the umbrella of KUCR, incorporates independently

  5. The first decade • New opportunities and initiatives • Video initiative: tuning the network for video applications, putting up an MCU • EETT/TRC project: connecting 24 elementary schools across the state to provide videoconferencing services for collaboration • SEGP

  6. The KanREN network

  7. The KanREN Consortium • Membership consortium serving: • Higher education • K-12 • Libraries • Other non-profits • Incorporated as a not-for-profit in 2002 • Filed for 501(c)(3) status • Independent of the state

  8. Governance • Board of Directors • Representation from each major constituency group (K12, community colleges, private colleges, regents universities, libraries, other organizations) • Each member institution has a vote on matters of consortium policy, budget, rates

  9. Fiscal growth • 1993/94—NSF funding totals ~$790k • 1995-present—self-funded • Annual budget increases from ~$400k to ~$2M • Increases reflect growth of staff and increased bandwidth demands

  10. Funding model • Self-funded since NSF grant days • Membership fees • Fees for service (connectivity, circuits, etc.) • No state funding • No grants or gifts

  11. The next decade • Kan-ed • Concept born in 1998 (KSDE) • Kan-ed Act passed in 2001—to be administered by the Board of Regents • Funding bill passed in 2002 • A bumpy road at times • It took a long time for KanREN’s role to become clear • The politics were weird at times • But we were Kan-ed “evangelists” throughout the process

  12. KanREN/Kan-ed • Kan-ed commissioned an Engineering Trade Study to sort things out • Network design • Collaborations with vendors, providers • Clear roles for KanREN have emerged • Assistance with network engineering • Operation of the Kan-ed NOC; network management

  13. The Kan-ed network • A “network of networks” • NAPs (Network Access/Aggregation Points) located strategically across the state—up to 20 of them • NAPs bring connectivity to convenient/economical places for providers to connect • Providers/“peering partners” connect their Kan-ed member customers to the network

  14. The Kan-ed network • Engineering trade study/RFP process • Juniper M7i/M10i selected for NAPs • OC-3 circuits from multiple telecoms interconnect NAPs • Very aggressive circuit pricing • Some redundancy • Some details to be worked out

  15. N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N NAP distribution SBC NAP Indep. NAP COX NAP

  16. KanREN/Kan-ed • Kan-ed has opened a funding stream from the state that simply didn’t exist before • Kan-ed has engineered a collaborative environment that is unprecedented in Kansas • Equipment vendors • Big telecoms, independents • A zillion “K-acronym” organizations

  17. Thanks! • Doug Heacock, Executive Director, KanREN • heacock@kanren.net

More Related