1 / 18

Screening Implementation: Referral and Follow-up

Screening Implementation: Referral and Follow-up. What Do You Do When the Screening Test Is of Concern? Paul H. Lipkin, MD D-PIP Training Workshop June 16, 2006.

ketan
Download Presentation

Screening Implementation: Referral and Follow-up

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Screening Implementation: Referral and Follow-up What Do You Do When the Screening Test Is of Concern? Paul H. Lipkin, MD D-PIP Training Workshop June 16, 2006 I have no relevant financial relationships with the manufacturer(s) of any commercial product(s) and/or provider of commercial services discussed in this CME activity.

  2. Surveillance And Screening Guidelines: AAP 2006 • Perform developmental surveillance at every well-child visit • Perform developmental screening using a standardized screening tool at 9, 18, and 30* months or when concern is expressed • If screening results are concerning, refer to developmental and medical evaluations and early intervention and early childhood services • Follow up on referrals made and continually track child’s developmental status

  3. Developmental Screening:Normal Results (AAP 2006) • When the results are normal: • Inform parents and continue with other aspects of the preventive visit • Provides an opportunity to focus on developmental promotion

  4. Developmental Screening:Concerns (AAP 2006) • When administered due to concerns: • Schedule early return visit for additional surveillance, even if the screening tool results do not indicate a risk of delay • When results concerning, refer for: • Developmental evaluations • Medical evaluations • Early developmental intervention/early childhood services

  5. Developmental Evaluation Principles (AAP 2006) • Performed when surveillance or screening identifies a child as being at high risk of a developmental disorder • Aimed at identifying the specific developmental disorder or disorders • Provides further prognostic information • Allows prompt initiation of specific and appropriate early childhood therapeutic interventions

  6. Developmental Diagnostic Evaluation • Aimed at identifying the specific developmental disorder or disorders • Performed by any of the following: • Trained and skilled general pediatrician • Pediatric subspecialist • Neurodevelopmental pediatricians, developmental and behavioral pediatricians, child neurologists, pediatric physiatrists, or child psychiatrists • Early childhood professional • Early childhood educators, child psychologists, speech language pathologists, audiologists, social workers, physical therapists, or occupational therapists • The primary care provider within the medical home should develop an explicit co-management plan with the specialist(s)

  7. Developmental Diagnostic Evaluation: Identification • If a developmental disorder is identified: • The child should be identified as a child with special health care needs • Practice registry recommended • Chronic condition management should be initiated

  8. Medical Diagnostic Evaluation:Aim And Components • To identify an underlying etiology • Vision screening and objective hearing evaluation • Review of newborn metabolic screening and growth charts • Update of environmental, medical, family, and social history for additional risk factors • May include brain imaging, electroencephalogram (EEG), genetic testing, and/or metabolic testing

  9. Medical Diagnostic Evaluation: Other Aims • May provide parents with a greater depth of understanding of their child’s disability • Can affect various aspects of treatment planning • Specific prognostic information • Genetic counseling around recurrence risk and family planning • Specific medical treatments for improved health and function of the child • Therapeutic intervention programming

  10. Medical Diagnostic Evaluation: Etiologic Investigation • Etiology identifiable in approximately one quarter of cases of delayed development • Higher rates (greater than 50%) in children with global developmental delays and motor delays • Lower rates (less than 5%) in children with isolated language disorders

  11. Referral:Early Developmental Intervention/Early Childhood Services • Often provide evaluation and other services: • Developmental therapies • Service coordination • Social work services • Assistance with transportation and related costs • Family training • Counseling • Home visits • Diagnosis not necessary for referral

  12. Referral:Early Developmental Intervention/Early Childhood Services • Settings: • Specialized health care centers • University centers • Early intervention programs • Early childhood educational programs • Private practices

  13. Referral Forms: Early Intervention and Local Education Agency

  14. Office Procedures • Document all surveillance, screening, evaluation, and referral activities in the child’s health record • Coordinate developmental and medical evaluations for children who have positive screening results • Initiate a program of chronic condition management for child identified with a developmental disorder

  15. Other Issues: • Establish working relationships with state and local programs, services, and resources • Utilize a quality-improvement model to integrate surveillance and screening into office procedures and to monitor their effectiveness and outcomes.

More Related