240 likes | 369 Views
The shift towards a regulated eco-economy is essential in response to the increasing complexity of economic systems and the urgent need for sustainable practices. This transformation emphasizes the importance of integrated design and stakeholder participation, moving beyond traditional top-down regulations. Greater focus on democracy, the human factor, and collaborative approaches is needed to align production with purpose. Through environmentally conscious practices and a shift from command-and-control to a more decentralized regulatory framework, we can foster a sustainable future that values community, ecological health, and economic resilience.
E N D
Regulation in an Eco-economy Transforming economic drivers
The Crisis of Markets The Swing to Regulation
Principles & Trends • increasing economic complexity demands more conscious involvement and direction. • Planning is more, not less, important, but… • The state can’t do it all. • Integrated design: • Social & environmental • Cross-disciplinary
Trends & Principles -2 • political-economic integration • moves beyond the state • more connected to overall rules of economic life • more connected to all stakeholders involved • [should be] part of a movement toward direct democracy
Knowledge-based / Quality-based development • Greater focus on the ‘human factor’ • From mindless to mindful markets: • Centrality of end-use & purpose of production • Integrated design: multi-dimensional goals • Greater levels of democracy/participation • From hierarchical to decentralized regulation • From external to internal self-regulation • Greater stakeholder involvement • Greater integration with everyday exchange & civil society • Role of The Commons: ecological, physical, electronic; Sharing & saving
Historical Trends in Regulation • early industrialism: separation between state and markets. Focus on production. • Fordist & state-socialist industrialism: • More concern with consumption / demand. • Need for more planning: political-economic intervention. • Today: even greater involvement of consciousness & planning is necessary; integrated ecosystem-based design. • Post-Fordist globalization: avoidance or disguising of conscious planning. • Suppression of new modes of mass collaboration.
Trends in Mainstream Regulation • End of pipe control and cleanup : 70s • Point Source Prevention : 80s • Consumption Patterns and Product & System Design : today
Contending Alternatives toCommand-and-Control Corporate critique • Regulation: costly and inefficient • Trade: a panacea • Avoidance of accountability • Focus on single bottom line • In Practice: tends to starve governments of regulatory resources—producing a self-fulfilling prophecy
Design Perspectiveon Regulation • Commoner, Hawken, Boyd, Geiser, Stahel, etc. • Need for levels of incentives/disincentives • Regulatory pluralism • From prescriptive to performance standards • Democracy: inclusion of stakeholders, growth of accountability • Movement toward fundamental solutions: • Service economy: redefining output • Lake economy: organic redesign • Must deal with ‘silo’ structures
The Precautionary Principle one of the two central principles of eco-regulation (along with the life-cycle approach) not the basis for 70s regulatory initiatives encourages benign materials design and use requires product/substance bans & phaseouts
‘Next Generation’ Regulatory Instruments …Often a confused combination of corporate and design elements Variations of ‘Regulatory Pluralism’ • self-regulation • co-regulation • voluntary agreements • regulatory flexibility • negotiated agreements • environmental partnerships • informational regulation • economic instruments.
Questions about ‘Instruments’ • Do they accept or reinforce chronic underfunding of government? • Are they based in corporate ideology (i.e. obsolete views of market forces)? • Do they deal with fundamental problems and solutions?
Elements of Green Economic Self-Regulation • the Scale of the economy: community and bioregional organization, harnessing technological potentials for decentralization via reutilization-industry, distributed energy-generation, eco-infrastructure, local money, co-operative consumption, etc. • Participatory democracy: Green Municipalism, participatory Green City Plans, community indicators & pattern-language development. • a Green regulatory structure: including community design pattern-languages, performance standards, product stewardship systems, product & substance bans, and other rules which encourage bioregionalism, quality and community. • Green market mechanisms: ecological tax systems, account-money & other community currencies, and a green financial infrastructure. • Knowledge as a regulatory force: via resource inventories, eco-accounting, product information & labelling, and community indicators.
‘Surrogate Regulators’ • community groups, NGOs • buyers / suppliers • investors • financial institutions • insurance companies Question: are these surrogates, or just vital elements of regulation today?
Tax-Shifting I: the Labour & Resource Relationship • Industrial economy: resource-intensive. labour productivity: Substitutes resources for labour. • Green Economy: people-intensive / resource-saving. Substitutes human creativity for resources
Tax Shifting II: the most radical kind? Carbon Tax to Basic Income
Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) • designing ownership patterns to achieve stewardship • a positive form of accountability that can “change the DNA” of corporate entities • closes loops and encourages service production • takes different forms in different industries and situations.
Varieties of EPR • liability where responsibility for environmental damages caused by a product—in production, use, or disposal—is borne by the producer; • economic responsibility where a producer covers all or part of the costs for managing wastes at the end of a product’s life (e.g. collection, processing, treatment or disposal); • physical responsibility where the producer is involved in the physical management of the products, used products or the impacts of the products through development of technology or provision of services; one common expression of this would be… • ownership where the producer retains ownership of the product over it entire service life, and • informative responsibility where the producer is required to provide information on the product and its effects during various stages of its life cycle. (Thorpe and Kruszewska,1999; Linquist, 1998)
Expressions OF EPR • Product take back for waste management • Life-cycle partnerships for waste management • Materials selection • Materials management • Extended environmental management programs • Leasing systems • Delivering service and function instead of products • Design-for-the-environment programs • Environmental purchasing
Frontiers of EPR Braungart’s Intelligent Product System • Consumables • Products of Service • Unmarketables Product-Service Systems … typically tries to facilitate: --sale of the use of product (rather than the product itself); --operational leasing, rather than ownership by consumers --repair rather than throwaway relationships
Strategic Modes of Regulation • Civil Society-based Certification systems • Ecological Tax Reform / tax shifting • Subsidies / green scissors • Green Procurement • EPR legislation • Guidelines for Green Finance: green development plans, etc.
Sector-based Action • green belts • building codes / zoning • renewable portfolio standards & standard offer contracts • product & substance bans, etc.
Other Resources • Conroy Powerpoint: Branded: How the Certification Revolution Facilitates New Ethics in International Affairs • Braungart : Cradle to Cradle design • McDonough on Cradle to California