1 / 36

Perioperative Fluid Management

kenyon
Download Presentation

Perioperative Fluid Management

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


    1. Perioperative Fluid Management Presented by: Int. ??? Supervised by: VS. ???

    3. Background

    4. Background Traditional concept of fluid loading. Preoperatively fasted patient hypovolemic due to ongoing perspiration and urinary output. Insensible lost increased dramatically during surgery when skin barrier is broken. Unpredictable fluid shift toward 3rd space requires substitution. Hypervolemia harmless because kidneys regulate the overload.

    5. Background Recently, perioperative fluid management has become a topic of debate – Colloids vs Crystalloids? Amount? Purpose of this review is to promote a rational approach to perioperative fluid management .

    6. Fluid Optimization

    7. Fluid Optimization Principle goal is to optimize cardiac preload Optimizing ? Maximizing. However, individual patient’s preoperative volume status, exact target unclear. Cannot access blood volume (preload) routinely. Double label method (gold standard) – invasive, complex, personnel intensive.

    8. Fluid Optimization Double label method – dilution technique. Plasma volume: ICG. Red cell volume: sodium fluorescein-labelled autologous RBCs. Whole blood volume = PV + RCV.

    9. Fluid Optimization Other indices ? PWP and CVP. -- Cannot accurately predict EDV due to variations in ventricular compliance. -- Changes cannot accurately reflect changes of EDV or SV.

    11. Fluid Optimization Goal directed approach – measure volume responsiveness. Systolic pressure and pulse pressure variation predict volume responsiveness. Outcome ?! Stroke volume maximization via esophageal Doppler-guided fluid boluses improve outcome, but cannot be routinely applied.

    12. Fluid Optimization Protocol-based fluid restriction in major abdominal surgery. Reduced perioperative complications such as cardiopulmonary events, bowel motility disturbance. Improved wound/anastomotic healing and reduced hospital stay.

    13. Fluid Optimization Lobo et al. reviewed 20 adults after elective colonic resection. Aggressive intraoperative fluids 20 mL/kg/hr. Postoperatively, randomly assigned to restrictive (< 2 L/day) or standard protocol (= 3 L/day). Latter caused significant weight gain, later return of bowel function and prolonged hospital stay.

    14. Fluid Optimization Mackay et al. did not confirm such findings, despite incomparable protocols. Standard group was treated “too restrictively”. ? Not enough to cause measurable harm!

    15. Fluid Optimization Brandstrup et al. reported perioperative fluid restriction (mean 2740 vs 5300 mL) reduced complications – anastomotic leakage, pulmonary edema, infection. No patient developed acute renal failure.

    16. Fluid Optimization Holte and Kehlet performed systematic review of 80 randomized clinical trials and recommended avoiding fluid overload in major surgical procedures.

    17. Fluid Shifting

    18. Fluid Shifting Fluid shifting out of the vasculature is an often recognized phenomenon during and after surgical procedures. Direct, indirect blood volume measurements shown major surgery causes a deficit of 3~6 L in the sensible perioperative fluid balance., i.e., measurable input minus output.

    20. Fluid Shifting Fluid shifting is not only an intraoperative problem but a postoperative problem. Peak of fluid shifting at 5 hrs after trauma and persists up to 72 hrs depending on location and duration of surgery.

    21. Fluid Shifting Lowell et al. found 40% of patient admitted to SICU had an excessive increase in body water of more than 10% of preoperative weight. Perioperative weight gain: Marker of fluid storage outside circulatory space. Inversely related to patient outcome.

    23. Fluid Shifting Assumed hypovolemic state after: Fasting. Insensible perspiration. Fluid-consuming third space. ? Preoperative loading > 2 mL/kg/hr fasting. Induction anesthesia. Lowered sympathetic tone, relative hypovolemia. ? Fluids instead of vasopressors -- threaten kidney function?!

    24. Fluid Shifting Basal evaporation = 0.5 mL/kg/hr ? 1 mL/kg/hr during large abdominal surgery with bowel exposure. After extended fasting: ECV slightly decreases. Intravascular volume remains within normal range.

    25. Fluid Shifting – Footnote Insensible water loss. Breathing – 500 to 700/24 hours. Skin – 300 mL/24 hours. ? Increases with fever, tachypnea, mechanical ventilation, surgery, etc.

    26. Fluid Shifting Hypervolemic loading with crystalloids: ? Physiologically distribute within the ECV. ? 4/5 will leave the vasculature. Hypervolemic loading with colloids: ? 60% do not remain in the vasculature due to volume effect.

    28. Fluid Shifting Consequently, traditional fluid loading ? Fluid shifting! ? Interstitial edema! ? Adversely affect patient outcome!

    29. The Endothelial Glycocalyx

    30. The Endothelial Glycocalyx Healthy vascular endothelium coated by endothelial glycocalyx – a layer of membrane-bound proteoglycans and glycoproteins.

    31. The Endothelial Glycocalyx Glycocalyx affect endothelial permeability. Prevent leukocyte and platelet adhesion. Decreases inflammation. Bounds plasma proteins and fluids. ? 700 ~ 1000 mL of “non-circulatory” plasma fixed within. ? Maintains “oncotic gradient” despite intravascular and extravascular equilibration.

    32. The Endothelial Glycocalyx Fluid shift into the interstitial space can be divided into two types: Type 1 – physiologic shift. -- Colloid-free fluid and electrolytes. Type 2 – pathologic shift. -- Protein-rich fluids. -- Functionally altered vascular barrier.

    33. The Endothelial Glycocalyx Type 2 shift, result of 2 iatrogenic problems. Surgical: Endothelial damage due to mechanical stress, endotoxin exposure, ischemia-reperfusion injury and SIRS. Anesthesiolgic: Acute hypervolemia!

    34. The Endothelial Glycocalyx Preserve endothelial glycocalyx to inhibit type 2 shift. Inflammatory mediators ,stress, ischemia- reperfusion injury can hardly be avoided. Maintaining vascular normovolemia. ? Key to protection of endothelial glycocalyx . ? Prevent interstitial edema.

    35. Approach to Fluid Management

    36. Approach to Fluid Management The intravascular deficit after fasting is usually low. Basal fluid loss via insensible perspiration approximately 0.5 mL/kg/hr, ? Extending to only 1 mL/kg/hr during major abdominal surgery.

    37. Approach to Fluid Management Minimize type 1 shifting. Use crystalloids only when replacing urine production and insensible perspiration. Use colloids or blood products for substitution of acute blood loss. Minimize type 2 shifting. Goal-directed method with available parameters. Conservatively to avoid acute hypervolemia. Use colloids instead of crystalloids.

More Related