1 / 1

Malodorant Fluxes From a Swine Waste Lagoon

Factor. Cool Season. Warm Season. Meteorological Conditions. Air Temperature, (ºC). 12.4 . 28.3. Lagoon Surface Temperature, (ºC). 14.4 . 29.7. Sludge Temperature, (ºC). 11.0 . 27.8. Insolation, (W m -2 ). 591.0 . 572.0. Humidity, (g m -3 ). 6.34. 23.8.

kenaz
Download Presentation

Malodorant Fluxes From a Swine Waste Lagoon

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Factor Cool Season Warm Season MeteorologicalConditions Air Temperature, (ºC) 12.4 28.3 Lagoon Surface Temperature, (ºC) 14.4 29.7 Sludge Temperature, (ºC) 11.0 27.8 Insolation, (W m-2) 591.0 572.0 Humidity, (g m-3) 6.34 23.8 Evaporation (mm h-1) 0.33 5.28 Net Radiation (W m-2) 173 141 Malodorant Fluxes From a Swine Waste Lagoon John Loughrin1, Arturo Quintanar2,Nanh Lovanh1, Rezaul Mahmood2, Joe St. Claire1, and Marty Haley1 1USDA-ARS, Bowling Green KY 2Dept. Of Geography and Geology Western Kentucky University Bowling Green KY The concentration of the malodorants p-cresol and p-ethylphenol were measured at 0.5 and 1.5 m above a waste lagoon during two campaigns spanning late winter through early spring and late spring through early summer. Logging of temperature, humidity, insolation, and wind speed as well as water column temperatures were done so that heat fluxes could be computed using an energy budget method and Bowen ratio estimates. Odors were quantified by entrainment on Tenax TA and subsequent thermal desorption-GC/MS. Predicted p-cresol concentration above lagoon Wind rose plots during cool and warm seasons Wastewater characteristics during cool and warm seasons The model that was found to correlate best with variation in malodorant concentrations and gradients had the terms describing evaporation and net available energy (Rn). Emissions were found to be much higher during the cool season than the warm season despite higher evaporation rates and more lagoon heating. This could be explained by much lower concentrations of malodorants in the lagoon during the warm season than in the cool season. Concentrations of the malodorants at 0.5 m above the lagoon were described by the equations: p-Cresol0.5m= -3990 +(-3093 * evaporation) + (62.3 * Rn): r2=0.7304; Pr>F <0.0001 p-Ethylphenol0.5m= -497 + (-378 * evaporation) + (7.68 * Rn): r2=0.7190; Pr <F 0.0001 Odor sampling raft Meteorological instruments Since the model included both cool season collections when evaporation on average was low, and warm season collections, when evaporation was relatively high, the evaporation terms have negative coefficients. However, when the cool season and warm season collection campaigns were considered separately, the relationship of both evaporation and Rn to variation in malodorant concentrations and gradients were positive. Results from this study are being used to develop estimates of fluxes from this waste lagoon over long periods. Further work is planned to quantify emissions over extended periods during which lagoon heating rates will vary greatly. Meteorological conditions during the two campaigns Lagoon Heating Rate and Heat Fluxes for June 2, 09

More Related