1 / 28

Remote Physical Device Fingerprinting

Remote Physical Device Fingerprinting. Authors Tadayoshi Kohno, Andre Broido, KC Claffy Appears in IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy, 2005 Presented by Peter Matthews. Introduction. There are a number of reliable techniques for remote operating system fingerprinting nmap XProbe

kelda
Download Presentation

Remote Physical Device Fingerprinting

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Remote Physical Device Fingerprinting Authors Tadayoshi Kohno, Andre Broido, KC Claffy Appears in IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy, 2005 Presented by Peter Matthews

  2. Introduction • There are a number of reliable techniques for remote operating system fingerprinting • nmap • XProbe • Paper proposes the next step: • Remotely fingerprint a physical devicewithout that device's knowledge or cooperation

  3. Clock Drift • A standard clock circuit in a computer system uses a quartz crystal oscillator as its time base, similar to any modern wristwatch • Some amount of imprecision in the oscillatory frequency • Clocks using these thus exhibit drift over time when compared to the actual time

  4. Clock Skew • A clock will usually have some offset • Offset(t) = time_reported(t) – true_time(t) • The clock skew S is the change in this offset over time • S = d Offset(t) / dt • Measured in ppm (μs/s)

  5. How much skew? • +/- 4 seconds a day common • (25 minutes a year) • Importantly, paper argues skew of a device is (generally) consistent and distinctive to that device • Thus can use as a fingerprint for this device 24 hours later

  6. Network Time Protocol (NTP) • Hierarchical server system • Top-level servers synchronized via atomic clocks, GPS • Used to synchronizes system clock periodically

  7. Techniques for Determining Clock Skew of a Remote Device • 3 approaches given

  8. TCP Timestamps Option (TSopt) • 32-bit timestamp contained in each packet, taken from a virtual clock that is “at least approximately proportional to real time” • Frequency (Hz) between 1 and 1000 • Windows 2000, XP – 10 Hz (100 ms resolution) • Redhat 9.0 – 100 Hz (10 ms resolution) • Usually reset to zero upon reboot • Usually not affected by changes to the device's system clock (NTP synchronization does not affect)

  9. Exploiting the TCP Timestamps Option (Passive Approach) • The measurer – any entity capable of observing TCP packets from the fingerprintee • Create a trace of TCP packets from fingerprintee • For each packet plot a point • X value: Amount of actual time passed between reception of first packet in trace and the current packet • Y value: The offset observed for this packet, based on timestamp

  10. Use linear programming to determine the equation of the line y = αx + β that best upper-bounds this set of points • α is the estimate of the clock skew • β is an initial observed offset

  11. TSopt clock skew estimates for two sources from a OC-48 link of a US Tier 1 ISP over a two hour period.

  12. Exploiting the TCP Timestamps Option (Semi-Passive Approach) • Windows 2000 and XP machines do not set timestamp flag in their initial SYN packets • RFC 1323 mandates that noneof the following TCP packets in the connection can include timestamp • Thus, previous approach will not work if a Windows machine is behind NAT, firewall

  13. Paper’s trick: The measurer includes timestamp in the responding SYN/ACK packet • Windows machines then include timestamp in all subsequent packets of this connection SYN, TSopt=0 SYN, TSopt=1 SYN-ACK, TSopt=1 Subsequently… data, timestamp data, timestamp

  14. ICMP Timestamps • Reports value of system clock (milliseconds past midnight) • RFC 792 requires frequency is 1000 Hz (1 ms resolution) • If system clock is updated via NTP regularly, will be relatively accurate • However, most hosts do so infrequently

  15. Exloiting ICMP Timestamp Requests (Active Approach) • The measurer: entity capable of sending ICMP Timestamp Request and storing the fingerprintee's subsequent ICMP Timestamp Reply messages • Limitation: Fingerprintee must not be behind a NAT or firewall that filters ICMP • Estimation of clock skew is similar to that in TSopt methods.

  16. Questions Concerning Clock Skew • What is the distribution of clock skews among devices? • How stable are these clock skews over time? • Can these clock skews be measured accurately, independent of network topology and access technology?

  17. Distribution of Clock Skews Figure 1: Histogram of TSopt clock skew estimates for sources in a 2 hour network trace from a OC-48 link of a US Tier 1 ISP. (Considered only sources that sent packet over a period of at least 50 minutes per hour, and sent at least 2000 packets per hour.)

  18. Could this skew simply reflect different operating system and hardware configurations? • To answer this, TSopt clock offsets were measured for 69 Micron 448 MHz Pentium II machines running Windows XP SP1 over 38 days • ~48 TCP packets with timestamp per hour

  19. TSopt clock offsets measured for 69 homogenous machines over 96 hours. • Clock skew can be used to distinguish some, but not all machines.

  20. Stability of Clock Skews • The network traces from this experiment were then divided into 12 and 24 hour periods • All periods of the same length for each machine were then compared • Range of maximum difference for a single device: • 12-hour period: 1.29 – 7.33 ppm, 2.28 ppm mean • 24-hour period: 0.01 – 5.32 ppm, 0.71 ppm mean • Supports authors’ claim that modern processors have relatively stable clock skews

  21. Independence of Access Technology • Fingerprinting of a laptop connected via various access technologies and locations • Skew estimates all within a 1 ppm range

  22. Independence of Network Topology • PlanetLab machines located globally used as measurer, same laptop as previous experiment • Excepting measurement from IIT, skew estimates within .5 ppm range • Generally speaking, estimates are largely independent of topology and distance between fingerprinter and fingerprintee

  23. Other OS Factors • For tested operating systems, system clock and TSopt clock effectively have the same clock skew

  24. Applications • Detecting virtual honeynets and virtual hosts • Counting number of devices behind a NAT • Tracking individual devices • With some probability • Arguing that a given device was not involved in a recorded event • Could use un-anonymized traces on a link to assign hosts in an anonymized trace

  25. Strengths • Shows that it is possible to extract relevant security information from data considered noise • Approach could be used with any other protocols that leak information about a device’s clock

  26. Weaknesses • Further experimentation required • Laptop running Windows XP SP2 has a noticeably different TSopt clock skew after switching to battery power • Newer processors throttle their speeds based on temperature and load, affects voltage from power supply • Easy to circumvent particular methods • echo 0 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_timestamps • Randomize TSopt timestamp • Filter ICMP timestamp

  27. Possible Extensions of Paper’s Approach • Utilization of approach with other protocols that leak information about a device’s clock • Use of profiling in combination with skew data • Skew is within a certain range and machine visits certain websites frequently • OS profiling techniques

  28. Questions?

More Related