1 / 18

Machine protection plans in ESS

Machine protection plans in ESS. Overview. About ESS & Cosylab Machine Protection System Overview Requirements Functionalities as services Reliability & safety Questions & open dilemmas. About Cosylab.

keitha
Download Presentation

Machine protection plans in ESS

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Machine protection plans in ESS

  2. Overview • About ESS & Cosylab • Machine Protection System • Overview • Requirements • Functionalities as services • Reliability & safety • Questions & open dilemmas

  3. About Cosylab • Cosylab is a company with 65 engineers, providing solutions in the area of Control System for large physics experiments • Conceptual studies • Device integrations • Complete timing system solution • Core CS development: EPICS (v4), ACS... • Our customers are from more the 50 labs from all over the world: ITER, ESS, SNS/ORNL, MedAustron, etc... • Our collaboration with ESS Control System group (Garry Trahern) is currently covering control system box, timing system, MPS and database

  4. European Spallation Source Length: 605.2m Proton kinetic energy: 2.5GeV Beam Power: 5MW Pulse length: 2.86ms Pulse repetition rate: 14Hz

  5. Machine Protection System CONTROL SYSTEM (Configuration management) BPS(Beam Permit System) Response time: 5-10µs ≈ 1000 signals Binary OK/NOK Binary OK/NOK MID (MPS Input Devices) MOD (MPS Output Devices) BIS (Beam Interlock System) TIMING SYSTEM Post Mortem

  6. Machine Protection System CONTROL SYSTEM (Configuration management) MOD(MPS Output Devices) BPS (Beam Permit System) MID (MPS Input Devices) Ion Source MID (MPS Input Devices) MOD (MPS Output Devices) Beam Loss Monitors BIS (Beam Interlock System) BIS (Beam Interlock System) RF System RFQ (dephase) Proton Ion Source Magnets LEBT Chopper Cryogenics Mitigation devices MEBT Chopper Movable devices Vacuum system Beam dumps TIMING SYSTEM Timing System Target Target Protection Block Post Mortem Instruments Personnel Protection System Powering Interlock

  7. MPS, PPS and TSS relation

  8. MPS as a service • MPS provides service to many devices • Around 1000 MID devices (inputs) • Few MOD devices (outputs) • Two main services: • Beam Permit • Beam Interlock • Additional services like: • Support for different machine modes • Support for commissioning phase • Support for post-mortem

  9. Beam Permit • BPS (Beam Permit System) validates all devices including BIS devices • If configuration is correct, BPS issues Beam Permit • BPS revokes Beam Permit after BIS stops the beam/machine • Can any other system stop the machine? Which one?

  10. Beam Interlock • Fast Beam Abort • Stop the beam a.s.a.p. • If the machine is in the middle of the pulse, abort it • Required response time 5-10µs • MID detection time + BIS time + MOD mitigation time • Exact times under evaluation • Propagation delay must be taking into account (3µs for 600m) • Next Pulse Inhibit • MPS allows current pulse to finish, but prohibits next one • Pulse repetition rate 14Hz -> 68ms for response • Who is responsible to know when the pulse finishes? • BIS or mitigation device

  11. Support for machine modes and commissioning phase • Different configurations for different machine modes • Machine mode might change during run-time • Input masking  • Ignoring non-critical inputs temporarily (as long as the machine is in safe mode) • Masked signals will be logged • Step-by-step commissioning • MPS grows with the machine

  12. Support for Post-Mortem • Data from operational MID devices will be logged • Circular buffers may be overwritten • MPS tells when to stop logging (via TS) • BIS devices log all signal changes with precise timestamp • All BIS devices are synchronised with TS • Post Mortem analysis • Collect logs from all devices (MID, MOD, BIS) • Merge into a single timeline • Provide different views on what was happening, which device caused machine to stop, etc.

  13. Reliability and safety • ESS targets high reliability – 95% • MPS reliability assured with • Fail-safe design • Redundancy • Self-diagnostics • MPS safety • SIL3 ? • MPS security • Configuration security: who can change settings? • (Re)Start security: Who has rights to (re)start the machine? What are restart preconditions?

  14. Other questions and open issues Analogue value Digital value (OK/NOK) MID(MPS Input Device) MID responsibility MPS responsibility EQUIPMENT BIS (Beam Interlock System) Compare against threshold MID(MPS Input Device) CONTROLLERBOARD • “Device Integration guidelines” should be prepared • Machine modes/operation modes • Confirmation on existence of mitigation devices • MPS reliability assessment - failure catalogue Mode dependent MPS responsibility boundaries

  15. The End Thank you!

  16. Backup

  17. Configuration Configuration MID (MPS Input Devices) CONTROL SYSTEM MOD (MPS Output Devices) Status Status Verify configuration Verify configuration Beam Loss Monitors BPS (Beam Permit System) RF System Ion Source Proton Ion Source Verify configuration RFQ (dephase) Magnets Beam Permit Configuration Cryogenics Status LEBT Chopper Mitigation devices MEBT Chopper Movable devices Vacuum system BIS (Beam Interlock System) Fast Beam Abort Timing System Target Protection Block Target Next Pulse Inhibit Instruments Personnel Protection System Beam dumps Powering Interlock Lock buffers Collect buffered data Modes, Sync TIMING SYSTEM Lock buffers Lock buffers Post Mortem Collect buffered data Collect buffered data DB HMI

  18. Customers From Nearly All Major Labs Worldwide

More Related