1 / 18

Cardiff September 10, 2009

or journal articles or textbooks. Developments in Economics Education. I. David Wheat Associate Professor of System Dynamics University of Bergen, Norway Adjunct Associate Professor of Economics Virginia Western Community College, U.S.A. Enabling Students to Compare Theories

keith
Download Presentation

Cardiff September 10, 2009

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. or journal articles or textbooks Developments in Economics Education I. David WheatAssociate Professor of System Dynamics University of Bergen, Norway Adjunct Associate Professor of Economics Virginia Western Community College, U.S.A. Enabling Students to Compare Theories In Media Stories about the Economy Cardiff September 10, 2009 1

  2. Challenge: Representing Causal Structures A challenge for students: representing a discipline's causal structures … hypotheses and theories … how and why things happen the way they do Even verbatim notes do not guarantee comprehension of hypotheses and theories. Students may merely memorize and repeat. What’s missing: a translation technique that structures information in a way that is • … faithful to the theory in the textbook, article, or news media • … yet comprehensible to the student.

  3. What is the Feedback Method? provides a “structured pattern” to facilitate understanding & comparison • 2007 DEE Conference: MacroLab Workshop • students use a simulation model of U.S. economy • students see structure represented in two formats: • stock & flow diagram • feedback loop diagrams • students examine behavior via interactive learning environment • enables even first-year students to study dynamics • Today: Feedback Method of Theory Representation 1. converts a theory (narrative text or equations) into causal links & loops 2. formulates the stock and flow structure of the theory 3. simulates the translated model 4. tests the theory’s predictive claims

  4. Example from 18th Century Economics wages delays _ || || + C laborsupply family size wages wages family size laborsupply + || Richard Cantillon • Essai Sur la Nature du Commerce en General (1755) • described the economic system as self-adjusting Cantillon’s wage model: • higher wages encourage larger families • larger families increase the labor supply • larger labor supply reduces wages _ + +

  5. Example from 19th Century Economics When there is a general impression that the price of some commodity is likely to rise, from an extra demand, a short crop, obstructions to importation, or any other cause, there is a disposition among dealers to increase their stocks, in order to profit by the expected rise. This disposition tends in itself to produce the effect which it looks forward to, a rise of price; and if the rise is considerable and progressive, other speculators are attracted...[resulting] in a further advance [in price]. John Stuart Mill (Principles of Political Economy, 1848)

  6. Mill’s Speculative Demand Model + + + expectation of rising prices When there is a general impression that the price of some commodity is likely to rise, from an extra demand, a short crop, obstructions to importation, or any other cause, there is a disposition among dealers to increase their stocks, in order to profit by the expected rise. This disposition tends in itself to produce the effect which it looks forward to, a rise of price; and if the rise is considerable and progressive, other speculators are attracted...[resulting] in a further advance [in price]. Variables: (1) expectation of rising prices (2) speculative demand (3) price speculative demand price expectation of rising prices

  7. Three Theories of the Housing Price Bubble 21st century example “There Is No Housing Bubble in the USA: Housing Activity Will Remain at High Levels in 2005 and Beyond”J. Smith (2005) “The 1998-2005 Housing 'Bubble' and the Current Correction: What's Different this Time?” Wheaton and Nechayev (2007) “From Bubble to Depression?” Gjerstad and V. Smith (2009)

  8. Model 1 “There Is No Housing Bubble in the USA: Housing Activity Will Remain at High Levels in 2005 and Beyond”

  9. Model 2 “The 1998-2005 Housing 'Bubble' and the Current Correction: What's Different this Time?”

  10. Model 3 “From Bubbleto Depression?”

  11. Comparing the Three Price-Bubble Theories* There Is No Housing Bubble … The Housing Bubble …What’s Different this Time? *adapted from Wheat (2009), “Empowering Students to Compare Ways Economists Think: The Case of the Housing Bubble,” International Journalof Pluralism andEconomics Education. Bubble to Depression?

  12. Summary Conclusions End product of a Feedback Method of mapping: • a set of causal links (and maybe a loop) representing how an economic process is believed to work • evidence of student-constructed understanding • facilitates comparison of economists’ theories Resulting “feedback map”--whether accurate or not--provides a forum for discussion that can …correct student misconceptions …facilitate better instructor explanations …enhance learning about dynamic processes in economics A commitment to pluralism in economics education requires a corresponding commitment to empower students to compare economists’ mental models.

  13. Thank you. david.wheat@uib.no +47-55-58-3081 Stay in touch.

  14. Feedback Loop Diagram of Sachs’ “Poverty Trap Model” + C population - official development assistance + + + Adapted from Jeffrey Sachs’The End of Poverty: EconomicPossibilities for our Time (2005)

  15. Stock-and-Flow Diagram of Sachs’ “Poverty Trap Model” R1 R2 C

  16. ODA = $100/year/person for 18 years ODA = $100/year/person for 15 years Simulation Results ODA = $100/year/person for 10 years ODA = 0 simulation 4 simulation 3 simulation 2 reference mode reference mode simulation 1 reference mode reference mode Incomeper capita Incomeper capita Incomeper capita Incomeper capita

  17. Summary • The Feedback Method Model reproduces the reference mode. • If the ODA policy is $100/year/person, it takes 18 years to produce sustainable growth in the Sachs model. • The Sachs model has several limitations, including: • It ignores all counteracting loops except one (capital depreciation) • It has no dynamic history. It ignores the development of the poverty trap. • It assumes investment responds only to saving;i.e., “expected profits” from investment do not affect investment

More Related