1 / 26

Viscous Hydrodynamics

AM and T. Hirano, Nucl . Phys. A 847 (2010) 283. Viscous Hydrodynamics. Akihiko Monnai Department of Physics, The University of Tokyo Collaborator: Tetsufumi Hirano. Heavy Ion Meeting 2010-12 December 10 th 2010, Yonsei University , Korea. Outline. Introduction

keilah
Download Presentation

Viscous Hydrodynamics

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. AM and T. Hirano, Nucl. Phys. A 847 (2010) 283 Viscous Hydrodynamics Akihiko Monnai Department of Physics, The University of Tokyo Collaborator: Tetsufumi Hirano • Heavy Ion Meeting 2010-12 • December10th 2010, Yonsei University, Korea

  2. Outline • Introduction Relativistic hydrodynamics and heavy ion collisions • Relativistic Dissipative Hydrodynamics Extended Israel-Stewart theory from law of increasing entropy • Results and Discussion Constitutive equations in multi-component/conserved current systems • Summary Summary and Outlook Introduction

  3. Introduction • Quark-gluon plasma (QGP) at relativistic heavy ion collisions Hadron phase (crossover) QGPphase sQGP (wQGP?) RHICexperiments (2000-) Discovery of QGP as nearly perfect fluid Thermodynamics is at work in QGP at RHIC energies Non-equilibrium effects need investigation for quantitative understandings Introduction

  4. Introduction • Hydrodynamic modeling of RHIC particles t t Freezeout Hadronic cascade picture Hydro to particles QGPphase hadronic phase Hydrodynamic picture Pre-equilibrium Initial condition z CGC/glasma picture? • Intermediate stage (~1-10 fm) is described by hydrodynamics • Results are dependent on the inputs: Equation of state, Transport coefficients Initial conditions Hydrodynamic equations Output Introduction

  5. Introduction • Properties of QCD fluid • Equation of state: relation among thermodynamic variables sensitive to degrees of freedom in the system • Transport coefficients: responses to thermodynamic forces sensitive to interaction in the system Naïve interpretation of dissipative processes Shear viscosity =response to deformation Bulk viscosity = response to expansion Energy dissipation =response to thermal gradient Charge dissipation =response to chemical gradients Introduction

  6. Introduction • Elliptic flow coefficients from RHIC data Hirano et al. (‘09) Ideal hydro Viscosity Glauber Initial cond. 1st order Eq. of state theoretical prediction ~ experimental data Ideal hydro works well Introduction

  7. Introduction • Elliptic flow coefficients from RHIC data Hirano et al. (‘09) Ideal hydro Viscosity Glauber Initial cond. 1st order Lattice-based Eq. of state theoretical prediction > experimental data Ideal hydro shows slight overshooting Introduction

  8. Introduction • Elliptic flow coefficients from RHIC data Hirano et al. (‘09) Ideal hydro Viscosity Color glass condensate Glauber Initial cond. Lattice-based Eq. of state *Gluons in fast moving nuclei are saturated to CGC theoretical prediction > experimental data Viscosityin QGP phase plays important role in reducing v2 Introduction

  9. Introduction • Why viscous hydrodynamic models? RHICexperiments (2000-) Success of ideal hydro Necessity of viscous hydro for improved inputs to the hydrodynamic models LHCexperiments (2010-) Viscous hydro? Asymptotic freedom in QCD QGP might become less-strongly coupled CERN Press release, November 26, 2010: “… confirms that the much hotter plasma produced at the LHC behaves as a very low viscosity liquid” Viscous hydro is likely to work also at the LHC energies Introduction

  10. Introduction • Viscous hydrodynamics needs improvement • Form of dissipative hydro equations • Treatment of conserved currents • Treatment of multi-component systems Song & Heinz (‘08) Fixing the equations is essential in fine- tuning viscosity from experimental data Low-energy ion collisions are planned at FAIR (GSI) & NICA (JINR) Only 1 conserved current can be treated # of conserved currents # of particle species baryon number, strangeness, etc. pion, proton, quarks, gluons, etc. We need to construct a firm framework of viscous hydro Introduction

  11. Introduction • Categorization of relativistic hydrodynamic formalisms Required for QGP/hadron gas at heavy ion collisions Overview

  12. Introduction • Categorization of relativistic hydrodynamic formalisms Required for QGP/hadron gas at heavy ion collisions In this work we formulate relativistic dissipative hydro for multi-component + multi-conserved current systems Overview

  13. Overview • Formulation of relativistic dissipative hydrodynamics START Energy-momentum conservation Charge conservations Law of increasing entropy Generalized moment method Moment eqs. , GOAL EoM for dissipative currents , , , Onsager reciprocal relationssatisfied Thermodynamics Quantities

  14. Thermodynamic Quantities • Tensor decompositions by flow where is the projection operator 2+N equilibrium quantities 10+4N dissipative currents Energy density: Hydrostatic pressure: J-th charge density: Energy density deviation: Bulk pressure: Energy current: Shear stress tensor: J-th charge density dev.: J-th charge current: *Stability conditions should be considered afterward Thermodynamic Stability

  15. Thermodynamic Stability • Maximum entropy state condition - Stability condition (1st order) - Stability condition (2nd order) automatically satisfied in kinetic theory *Stability conditions are NOT the same as the law of increasing entropy Relativistic Hydrodynamics

  16. Relativistic Hydrodynamics • Ideal hydrodynamics • Dissipative hydrodynamics (“perturbation” from equilibrium) Unknowns(5+N) Conservation laws (4+N) + EoS(1) , , , , , Additional unknowns (10+4N) Moment equations (10+4N) !? , , , , , , Defined in relativistic kinetic theory as New equations in our work Estimated from the law of increasing entropy Moment Equations

  17. Moment Equations • Introduce distortion of distribution *Grad’s moment method extended to multi-conserved current systems 10+4N unknowns , are determined in self-consistency conditions The entropy production is expressed in terms of and Viscous distortion tensor & vector Moment equations Dissipative currents , , , , , , Matching matricesfor dfi Semi-positive definite condition Constitutive Equations

  18. Constitutive Equations • Bulk Pressure response to expansion cross terms (linear) 2nd order corrections relaxation term Cross termsappear (reciprocal relations) 2nd order termsin full form (multi-conserved currents) Relaxation termappears (causality is preserved) Constitutive Equations

  19. Constitutive Equations • Energy current response to temperature gradient cross terms (linear) 2nd order corrections relaxation term Constitutive Equations

  20. Constitutive Equations • Charge currents response to chemical gradient (+ cross terms) cross terms (linear) 2nd order corrections relaxation terms Constitutive Equations

  21. Constitutive Equations • Shear stress tensor • Discussion - Relaxation term response to deformation 2nd order corrections relaxation term Hiscock & Lindblom (‘85) Linear response Acausal and unstable in relativistic systems Relaxation effect to limit the propagation faster than the light speed Discussion – Cross terms

  22. Discussion - Cross terms • Coupling of thermodynamic forces in the dissipative currents ex. Onsager reciprocal relations (          )is satisfied • Cf: “Cooling” process for cooking tasty oden (Japanese soup) ingreadients potato soup thermal gradient Chemical diffusion via thermal gradient Soret effect It should play an important role in our “quark soup” Discussion – 2nd order terms

  23. Discussion – 2nd order terms • Comparison with AdS/CFT+phenomenological approach • Comparison with Renormalization group approach Baier et al. (‘08) • Our approach goes beyond the limit of conformal theory • Vorticity-vorticity terms do not appear in kinetic theory Tsumura & Kunihiro (‘09) • Consistent, as vorticity terms are added in their recent revision • Frame-dependent equations Discussion – 2nd order terms

  24. Discussion – 2nd order terms • Comparison with Grad’s 14-moment approach Betz et al. (‘09) • The form of their equations are consistent with that of ours • Multiple conserved currents are not supported in 14-moment method Consistencies suggest we have successfully extended 2nd order theory to multi-component + conserved current systems Summary and Outlook

  25. Summary and Outlook • We formulated generalized 2nd order dissipative hydro from the entropy production w/o violating causality • Multi-component systems with multiple conserved currents Inelastic scattering (e.g. pair creation/annihilation) included • 1st order cross terms are present Onsager reciprocal relations are satisfied • Frame independent Independent equations for energy and charge currents • Future prospects include applications to… • Numerical estimation of viscous hydrodynamic models for relativistic heavy ion collisions • Cosmological fluid, and more AM & T. Hirano, in preparation

  26. The End • Thank you for listening! Appendices

More Related