1 / 23

2003 Single-Family Home Rebate Program Evaluation

2003 Single-Family Home Rebate Program Evaluation. Summary of Final Evaluation Report Prepared by: John Cavalli, Itron Tami Rasmussen, KEMA Kenneth James, PG&E July 26, 2006. Evaluation Objectives. Participation Assessment Identify measures contributing to savings Program Verification

keilah
Download Presentation

2003 Single-Family Home Rebate Program Evaluation

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. 2003 Single-Family Home Rebate Program Evaluation Summary of Final Evaluation Report Prepared by: John Cavalli, Itron Tami Rasmussen, KEMA Kenneth James, PG&E July 26, 2006

  2. Evaluation Objectives Participation Assessment • Identify measures contributing to savings Program Verification • Verify that measures were installed and program-qualifying Process Assessment • Examine program awareness and customer satisfaction. • Assess retailer and contractor involvement. Measure Assessment • Detailed characterization and assessment of program influence for Programmable Thermostats, Central Air Conditioners and Windows.

  3. Program Targets and Accomplishments • Overall, the program fell short of its electric savings goals, but met the majority of its gas and HTR goals. • Energy and demand savings: • HTR accomplishments:

  4. Program Accomplishments • Programmable Thermostats contributed over a third of the program’s kWh and Therms accomplishments. • Pool Pumps contributed 20% of the program’s kWh accomplishments. • Clothes Washers contributed a quarter of the program’s Therms accomplishments.

  5. Program Verification Results Overall the accomplishments reported to the CPUC were accurately reported and installed. • Applications – were entered correctly and invoices verified program qualifying equipment. • Measure Accomplishments and Ex Ante Values – were verified comparing tracking data, CPUC Final workbooks and PIPs. • HTR Accomplishments – were verified comparing tracking data and CPUC Final workbooks. • Measure Installations – were verified through 1,065 telephone surveys, and were determined to be program qualifying through 76 on-sites. • 98% of surveyed participants recalled receiving their rebate • 98% still have their measure installed • 100% of measures were verified on-site

  6. Process and Measure Assessments • Interviews with 742 Participants • Interviews with 42 HVAC contractors, 40 windows contractors, and 21 retailers.

  7. Sources of Program Awareness • Retailers remained the primary source for program awareness.

  8. Where Participants Obtain Rebate Applications • Retailers also provided participants with rebate applications nearly half of the time. • Significant increase in obtaining applications online

  9. Satisfaction • Compared to 2002 • Participant satisfaction with rebate turnaround time increased, reflecting IOU efforts to streamline application processing. • Bill savings continued to receive the lowest satisfaction score.

  10. Process Assessment - Retailers • Retailers continue to be a key market actor in moving the energy-efficient appliance market. • Appliance purchasing participants tend to learn about rebates through retailers. • Nearly 75% got an application at a retailer. • 89% recalled speaking with a retail salesperson. • 67% recalled in-store advertising. • Nearly all retailers interviewed were aware of the program.

  11. Retailers – Point of Sale Rebates • 44,000 Energy Star Programmable Thermostats were rebated through point-of-sale discounts. • 67% of the retailers interviewed supported expanding POS rebates to additional measures: • Clothes washers, whole house fans, room air conditioners, and pool pumps • POS Retailers believed sales for other program-qualifying equipment could increase by 25% if POS were expanded. • The most significant benefits of the POS approach: • Customers receive their rebates instantly and avoid the hassle of filling out a rebate form. • The greatest drawbacks of the POS approach: • Retailers must rely on the utilities for payment, • Smaller retail establishments are not equipped to handle POS rebates.

  12. Process Assessment - Contractors • Contractors figure prominently into making participants aware of program-qualifying heating and cooling measures. • Nearly half of the heating and cooling measure participants: • Became aware of the program through a contractor. • Obtained their application from their contractor. • Over 80% of the contractors interviewed were aware of the program. • Over half of the contractors interviewed said they actively promote rebates. • 70% of HVAC contractors fill out rebate applications on behalf of their customers.

  13. Energy Star Programmable Thermostat Assessment • 24,000 participants submitted an application for an Energy Star programmable thermostat rebate. • 7,000 installed on their own (DIY – do-it-yourself) • 17,000 had a contractor install • 44,000 participants received a point-of-sale (POS) discount from a participating retailer. • Tracking data were not collected for these customers, and only 25 participants were surveyed.

  14. P-Stat: Existing Equipment and Sales • According to contractors, • 44% of their customers have a programmable thermostat • 21% of their customers have Energy Star-qualified thermostats. • Many Participants replaced existing programmable thermostats • 26% of Contractor installs, 17% of DIY and 12% of POS • HVAC contractors claim installing Energy Star programmable thermostats has become standard practice • 74% of contractor thermostat installations are Energy Star. • However, contractors say only a third of their customers ask for Energy Star-qualified thermostats.

  15. P-Stat: Usage • Nearly half of participants claim to use their air conditioner/furnace less after installing their new thermostat • About 40% do not use the programmable features: • Very few use the factory settings (about 10%). • Contractors tend to program the unit for their customers and show them how to use it, according to both contractors and participants.

  16. P-Stat Influence: Contractor Installations The Program is having a limited influence on contractor installed units: • 63% of participants claim they would have purchased an Energy Star thermostat in the absence of the program • Only 23% said the rebate was very influential • However, 41% were somewhat influenced • Contractors also indicate program is having limited influence on what they recommend and install. • 95% of contractors replace thermostat when installing AC • 78% install an Energy Star Programmable Thermostat • Contractors report sales of Energy Star Programmable Thermostats would decrease by only 9% if the program discontinued.

  17. P-Stat Influence: DIY Installations The Program is also having a limited influence on DIY installations: • 69% of participants claim them would have purchased an Energy Star thermostat in the absence of the program • Only 27% said the rebate was very influential • However, 50% were somewhat influenced

  18. P-Stat Influence: POS Installations The Program appears to have more influence on POS installations: • 43% said the rebate was very influential • Only, 16% were not at all influenced • However, 62% of participants claim them would have purchased an Energy Star thermostat in the absence of the program • Retailers report that: • Only 54% of the units they sell are programmable, and only 35% are Energy Star. • Discontinuing the program would reduce sales of Energy Star thermostats by as much as one third

  19. Central Air Conditioner – Program Influence • Participants claim they are not very influenced by the program. • 88% say they would have purchased an energy efficient CAC without the rebate. • 37% of participants were not at all influenced by the rebate, and only 18% were very influenced. • 67% claim their primary reason for purchasing a new CAC was to replace an old, broken or poorly-performing unit. • Contractors are much more influential on CAC purchase decisions than the rebate. • 49% of participants claim that their contractors were very influential and only 22% said that they were not at all influential.

  20. Central Air Conditioner – Program Influence • The program’s influence on the CAC market is seen more directly on the actions taken by contractors that actively promote the program than on consumers. • Contractors are recommending and explaining the benefits of high efficiency equipment to over 75% of participants • Contractors are filling out the application on behalf of the participant (70% of the time). • Participants are not very knowledgeable about SEER and/or Energy Star ratings for HVAC equipment (only about a third are knowledgeable) • Most participants (55%) do not initially request high efficiency equipment from their contractor. • Contractors claim their sales would be significantly reduced without the rebate. • By as much as a third for Tier III equipment.

  21. Windows – Program Influence • Rebates for high-performance dual-pane windows do not appear to have any significant influence on whether or not customers purchase these types of windows. • 90% of participants said that they would have purchased high performance windows absent the rebate • 43% said that they were not at all influenced by the rebate, • Only 10% said that they were very influenced. • Window contractors claimed that high-performance windows accounted for 80% of their total installations. • Even contractors unaware of the rebate program claimed that high-performance windows accounted for 78% of their total installations. • Both aware and unaware contractors almost always recommend high performance windows.

  22. Free Ridership Assessment • An assessment of free ridership was made using three participant self report modeling scenarios. Ranges of free ridership were as follows: • Energy Star Programmable Thermostats: 42 – 78% • Windows: 62 – 91% • Central air conditioners not modeled, as it is believed the contractors were primary influencing factor.

  23. Recommendations • Reassess the cost-effectiveness of the programmable thermostat rebate • Reassess the program’s gross per unit energy savings estimate for programmable thermostats • Consider eliminating window rebates • Continue central air conditioning rebates • Consider moving the CAC rebate upstream, as the program appears to directly influence contractors, but not customers • Attempt to identify POS rebate participants and better assess the program’s influence on this delivery mechanism.

More Related