Duality Theory of Non-Convex Technologies

1 / 16

# Duality Theory of Non-Convex Technologies - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Duality Theory of Non-Convex Technologies. Timo Kuosmanen Wageningen University EEA-ESEM 2003, Stockholm 20-24 August 2003. What is duality theory?. Equivalence between direct models expressed in terms of physical quantities and indirect models expressed in monetary terms.

I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.

## PowerPoint Slideshow about 'Duality Theory of Non-Convex Technologies' - kedem

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript

Duality Theory of Non-Convex Technologies

Timo Kuosmanen

Wageningen University

EEA-ESEM 2003, Stockholm 20-24 August 2003.

What is duality theory?
• Equivalence between direct models expressed in terms of physical quantities and indirect models expressed in monetary terms.
• Consider e.g. utility functions vs. expenditure functions.
• In the context of production:
• Shephard (1953): Cost and Production Functions, Princeton.
• Färe and Primont (1995): Multi-Output Production and Duality: Theory and Applications, Kluwer.
Duality of profit and production possibilities
• Example:
• production possibility set:
• profit function:
• If T is a non-trivial (non-empty, closed, …) production set that satisfies free disposability and convexity, then
Objectives

1) Understanding of the asymmetric role of convexity in Duality Theory, and its practical implications.

2) Generalizing Duality Theory to account for non-convexities rather than assume them away

Asymmetry of assumptions
• Model A Model B
• Model A Model B
• Model A Model B
Conclusion 1
• All models contain information of production possibilities and profit possibilities.
• Models differ in terms of their information content.
• Assuming convexity and monotonicity simplifies the setting so that the information content of all models is the same.
Conclusion 2:
• We can always recover a model that contains less information from a model that contains more information. No convexity is needed!
• Example: We can always recover the profit function is the production possibility set T is known. This does not depend on convexity or non-convexity of T.
Conclusion 3:
• In principle, the information content of the model is independent of the orientation of the model as production, economic, or indirect model.
• Example: Constrained profit function and the production possibility set are both complete, equivalent representations of technology.
Conclusion 4:
• In practice, the information content of production models is usually higher than the information content of economic or indirect models.
• Example: Standard profit function enables us to recover an outer approximation - the convex monotonic hull - of the production possibility set, but not necessarily the exact set.
Conclusion 5:
• Economic models retain their usual regularity properties (monotonicity, convexity/concavity) even if the underlying technology is non-convex.
• Example: Cost function is concave, and continuous in input prices even if the production possibility set is non-convex.
Implications to
• Testing hypotheses empirically
• indirect / dual approach for testing convexity
• Model specification
• Found duality between the indirect cost/revenue functions and the Petersen technology (non-convex technology with convex input isoquants and concave output isoquants.
Paper availability
• To appear in Journal of Productivity Analysis