1 / 17

Ground Stabilization Methods for a Coal Combustion Product Landfill

Ground Stabilization Methods for a Coal Combustion Product Landfill. By Victoria Howland and Scott Turgeon. Worcester Polytechnic Institute Civil and Environmental Engineering. Major Qualifying Project Stantec Project Center Center Director: Fred Hart Faculty Co-Advisor: Suzanne LePage

keaton
Download Presentation

Ground Stabilization Methods for a Coal Combustion Product Landfill

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Ground Stabilization Methods for a Coal Combustion Product Landfill By Victoria Howland and Scott Turgeon

  2. Worcester Polytechnic InstituteCivil and Environmental Engineering • Major Qualifying Project • Stantec Project Center • Center Director: Fred Hart • Faculty Co-Advisor: Suzanne LePage • On-Site Stantec Advisor: Tom Pace

  3. Problem Statement • Byproducts of coal combustion plants can cause water and soil contamination if not disposed of properly in a landfill. Given an earthquake, the landfill would be subject to various modes of failure, releasing byproducts into the surrounding environment.

  4. Problem Statement Solutions • Identify applicable stabilization methods • Deep Soil Mixing • Mixing slurry with in-situ soil • Jet Grouting • Spraying grout into the ground • Slurry Trenching • Creating a slurry wall • Stone Columns • Creating columns from stone • Decision analysis for most suitable stabilization method

  5. Gathering Data

  6. Area Replacement Ratio • Compare methods according to area replaced • Ideally 20-30% • ARR=

  7. Initial Results

  8. Address Discrepancies Cost Production Rate

  9. Decision Matrix

  10. Cost • Given cost per volume • Equipment, materials, labor

  11. Schedule • Given production rates • Total time dependent on quantity

  12. Safety • Construction can be a dangerous industry • Considered construction methods, machines, and processes for installing each stabilization technique • Same levels of safety

  13. Proven Technology • When it was invented • Previous successes and failures • Established stabilization practice

  14. Constructability • Ease of installing the technique into the surrounding area • Proper soil conditions, space limitations, or landmark restrictions

  15. Client Meeting • Met with client to discuss matrix weighting • Cost = 20% • Schedule = 20% • Safety = 15% • Proven Technology = 25% • Constructability= 20%

  16. Decision Matrix with Data

  17. Questions?

More Related