1 / 19

David Stratas Federal Court of Appeal

David Stratas Federal Court of Appeal. Factums. ● Does oral argument matter at trial? On appeal? ● Oral argument trends ● Hearings in writing ● The growth of Ministerial, administrative, and regulatory hearings. Opening considerations.

kcartwright
Download Presentation

David Stratas Federal Court of Appeal

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. David Stratas Federal Court of Appeal Factums

  2. ● Does oral argument matter at trial? On appeal? ● Oral argument trends ● Hearings in writing ● The growth of Ministerial, administrative, and regulatory hearings Opening considerations

  3. ● How we use factums: before, during and after hearing ● How we use other material, like evdientiary records Opening considerations

  4. ● Your generational advantage ● Factum instruction: relationship to other forms of legal writing, e.g. written submissions, regulatory submissions, reporting letters and emails, office communications. Opening considerations

  5. ● The portability of written work ● Office prejudices: “good writers are smart” ● Reputation ● The evolution of factums: pictures, sound files, hyperlinks Opening considerations

  6. Before writing… ● What are the facts? Squeeze the record dry ● What is the law? Research and assess fully ● Can’t make a good wall with lousy bricks Opening considerations

  7. ● But leave lots of time for writing ● The relationship between writing and research/factual appreciation ● The power of writing to reveal strengths and weaknesses Opening considerations

  8. ● The relevance of procedural rules and practice directions ● Formatting; the major sections of a factum; how to serve; filing times Opening considerations

  9. ● The “fact” section and the “law” section – are we limited to facts in the former and law in the latter? ● The role of a good introduction Opening considerations

  10. ● Neglected parts of the factum: remedies and the schedules ● Time-consuming things: start early Opening considerations

  11. ● all relevant parts of the evidentiary record are accurately and fairly presented ● all applicable law is found, synthesized and reported accurately Intellectual persuasion

  12. ● the law is applied simply, logically and fairly to the evidentiary record ● the right issues are focused upon; time is not wasted on fringe or irrelevant issues Intellectual persuasion

  13. ● the “moral highground” or “colour” of a case ● relevant to discretions ● not always relevant: “policy fools”and “Judge Judy litigants” Emotional persuasion

  14. ● usually achieved through skilful exposition of facts: selecting and arranging the facts in a clinical way rather than using adjectives or broad-brushing through assertion Emotional persuasion

  15. ● the critical or doubting judge ● tone: acquaint the judges with the problem and then help them find an easy, practical solution ● tone: riding “shotgun” with the judge Credibility persuasion

  16. ● a calm, welcoming dialogue that seduces judges in to the submission, not a hectoring, preachy diatribe that repels all ● don’t over-emphasize the strengths and de-emphasize the case you have to answer Credibility persuasion

  17. ●Don’t frighten. Offer arguments that have few implications; don’t ask judges to hit someone’s credibility unless you have to Credibility persuasion

  18. ● high-quality presentation (ease of read), brevity (careful and fair selection of facts and law), easy structure, candour, proper formatting, accurate and ample citations, overall accuracy ● clear, direct and brief prose Credibility persuasion

  19. ● Obligations to your client ● Obligations to your adversary ● Obligations to the court Ethics, professionalism and civility

More Related