1 / 15

Advertising Equal Cost Multi-Path Routes in BGP

Advertising Equal Cost Multi-Path Routes in BGP. Manav Bhatia Samsung India Software Operations, Bangalore – India July 17, 2003 57 th IETF - Vienna draft-ecmp-routes-in-bgp-00.txt. The Problem Statement. Route Reflectors only reflect the routes which “they” think are the best !

kaylee
Download Presentation

Advertising Equal Cost Multi-Path Routes in BGP

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Advertising Equal Cost Multi-Path Routes in BGP Manav BhatiaSamsung India Software Operations, Bangalore – IndiaJuly 17, 2003 57th IETF - Vienna draft-ecmp-routes-in-bgp-00.txt

  2. The Problem Statement • Route Reflectors only reflect the routes which “they” think are the best ! • True Load Balancing not always possible • In some cases leads to persistent route Oscillations • Solutions in RFC 3345 place Network Design Constraints which is not a long term solution – Protocol must be enhanced

  3. Route Reflector’s View of the Best Path

  4. Solution

  5. BGP MED Oscillation - 1

  6. BGP MED Oscillation - 2

  7. BGP MED Oscillation - 3

  8. BGP MED Oscillation – The Solution

  9. How to Advertise Multiple BGP Routes? • If more than one route for a given NLRI is announced then it is considered as an implicit withdraw for the former advertisement • New Optional Non Transitive attribute ECMP_NEXT_HOP introduced • NEXT_HOP attribute not mandatory if ECMP_NEXT_HOP present • Semantics of the BGP UPDATE message unchanged • Modify Phase 2 and Phase 3 of the Decision Process

  10. ECMP_NEXT_HOPAttribute

  11. Advertising multiple routes with ECMP_NEXT_HOPattribute

  12. Appending routes using ECMP_NEXT_HOPattribute

  13. Removing one of the Multiple Routes

  14. Pragmatic Considerations • Advertising both Reachable and Unreachable Prefixes • Multi-Protocol BGP • Additional Load in the Network • Impact on BGP Convergence • Flapping BGP ECMP route • May give higher degree of preference to a peer we know has more number of ECMP routes

  15. Next Steps • Possibly combine with draft-lefaucheur-multiprotocol-nh-00.txt • Get Feedback !

More Related