1 / 19

MACROECONOMIC IMPLICATIONS OF FINANCIAL CONSTRAINTS 1. Credit crunch.

MACROECONOMIC IMPLICATIONS OF FINANCIAL CONSTRAINTS 1. Credit crunch. 9th set of transparencies for ToCF. INTRODUCTION. GREAT DEPRESSION. Irving Fisher ( EMA 1933): aggrevated by "poor performance" of financial markets. DEBT DEFLATION. Friedman-Schwartz (1963): role of money supply.

kaveri
Download Presentation

MACROECONOMIC IMPLICATIONS OF FINANCIAL CONSTRAINTS 1. Credit crunch.

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. MACROECONOMIC IMPLICATIONS OF FINANCIAL CONSTRAINTS 1. Credit crunch. 9th set of transparencies for ToCF

  2. INTRODUCTION GREAT DEPRESSION • Irving Fisher (EMA 1933): aggrevated by "poor performance" of financial markets DEBT DEFLATION • Friedman-Schwartz (1963): role of money supply. • Bernanke (1983): breakdown in banking. BALANCE SHEET CHANNEL vs LENDING CHANNEL Typical pattern: Recession, high interest rates weak balance sheets of firms loan losses + low asset prices reduce equity in financial sector. Two sectors (real + financial) are constrained.

  3. US 1990-91 recession (rather typical) • banks: reduction in capital ratio decline in bank lending • flight to quality • credit crunch hits poor firms first • large/healthy firms can go to CP or bond markets. Same pattern in the wake of a tight money episode (Romer-Romer BPEA 1990). Modeling : Apply logic of credit rationing to the two tiers.

  4. MODEL BORROWERS Risk neutral parties • borrowers (firms) • monitors (banks) • investors ("firms") Have 1 project / idea each Investment cost I Verifiable 0 (failure) return R (success) Moral hazard: Versions of the project bad (low private benefit) Bad (high private benefit) good Private benefit: Prob( R) (only good project is viable)

  5. Have assets Total assets of intermediaries = Km. Cumulative distribution G(A). MONITORS ("financial intermediaries", "banks") can rule out high private benefit bad project of borrower at cost c (moral hazard). INVESTORS uninformed / free riding (actually: implication of the model), demand expected return Exogenous interest rate: access to "storage facility" yielding interest rate i. Endogenous interest rate: savings.

  6. EXOGENOUS INTEREST RATE Equilibrium Intermediation

  7. Certification

  8. Intermediation Certification Bank loan (on balance sheet). Venture capitalist Lead investment bank Bankers acceptances (commercial paper) Partial securitization of a loan.

  9. where DIRECT FINANCE Need

  10. INDIRECT FINANCE

  11. Because firm wants to use as little informed capital as possible: Firm gets financed if it has assets where is increasing in . EQUILIBRIUM M:

  12. If interest rate  is endogenous Supply imperfectly elastic. Demand for uninformed capital:

  13. COMPARATIVESTATICS 3 types of recessions Lending channel Classical recession Balance sheet channel Credit crunch Industrial recession Shortage of savings [Intermediaries] [Firms] [Investors] parameter of first order stochastic dominance or Correlation. Leads and lags In the three types of capital squeeze, aggregate investment goes down and goes up.

  14. CREDIT CRUNCH Fact: small firms are prime victims of credit crunch. [Empirical evidence.]

  15. VARIABLE INVESTMENT SCALE decreases  A decrease in Km (credit crunch) increases  decreases solvency ratio of banks (intermediation) increases equity ratio of firms

  16. decreases  decreases  increases rm decreases rb A decrease in Kb (balance sheet channel)

  17. Description of equilibrium (1) inverse function of (2) (3)

  18. r increases with c High monitoring intensity high solvency requirements. • Banks have become low-intensity monitors over the years. • Finance companies, firms themselves are higher- intensity monitors better capitalized. Intermediation (banks) vs certification (venture capital) Certifiers have r = 1!

  19. OTHER RESEARCH PROJECTS Dynamics: • Simultaneous growth of financial and real sectors. • Increasing share of financial sector. Move toward less intensive monitoring. Certification vs intermediation. Division of labor between intermediaries and firms, among intermediaries: shallow vs deep information.

More Related