1 / 15

A. Stankus - Klaipeda University, Mechatronics Science Institute

Comparison of point-to-point and multipoint human artery pulse wave transit time measurement algorithms. A. Stankus - Klaipeda University, Mechatronics Science Institute Ž. Lukošius - Klaipeda University, Department of Informatics Engineering

kato
Download Presentation

A. Stankus - Klaipeda University, Mechatronics Science Institute

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Comparison of point-to-point and multipoint human artery pulse wave transit time measurement algorithms A. Stankus - Klaipeda University, Mechatronics Science Institute Ž. Lukošius - Klaipeda University, Department of Informatics Engineering D. Aponkus - Klaipeda University, Department of Informatics Engineering V. Stankus - Kaunas University of Technology, Department of Physics M. Kurmis - VU Institute of Mathematics and Informatics, Software engineering department A. Andziulis - Klaipeda University, Department of Informatics Engineering U. Locans - Ventspils University College ELECTRONICS‘ 2012 18-20 June, Palanga, Lithuania

  2. PWV (PTT) can be estimated in several ways: • Between the peak of ECG R-wave and the peak of the pulse wave, • Between two points in different pulse waves, • Multipoint. • So far, there is no well-established methodology, which could provide high accuracy and convenience. ELECTRONICS‘ 2012 18-20 June, Palanga, Lithuania

  3. Problems in PTT/PWV estimation • Selection of the physical origin of the signal recording, • filters, • diversity of the selected PTT identification points, • physiological errors (isovolumetric ventricular contraction time), • inaccurate distance measurement in ‘‘foot-to-foot’’or “point-to-point” time calculation methods. ELECTRONICS‘ 2012 18-20 June, Palanga, Lithuania

  4. The aim of investigation • to compare the accuracy of the point-to-point PTT measurement methods with the accuracy of multi-point measurement methods. ELECTRONICS‘ 2012 18-20 June, Palanga, Lithuania

  5. Methods • The research was carried out with: • 18 healthypeople, • age from 18 to 25 years old. • Each test lasted 3-4 minutes. • ECG and two-channel electroplethysmograph were used to record pulse waves. ELECTRONICS‘ 2012 18-20 June, Palanga, Lithuania

  6. Methods • Signals were discretised by: • 16-bit analog to digital converter • 1 kHz sampling rate, • 450 samples set. • R-wave of the ECG was used as synchronization trigger ELECTRONICS‘ 2012 18-20 June, Palanga, Lithuania

  7. Placement of the electrodes ELECTRONICS‘ 2012 18-20 June, Palanga, Lithuania

  8. Triggered ECG signal, knee and ankle pulse waves ELECTRONICS‘ 2012 18-20 June, Palanga, Lithuania

  9. Point-to-point time measurement ELECTRONICS‘ 2012 18-20 June, Palanga, Lithuania

  10. Cross-correlation function between the second order derivatives of two waves (multipoint) ELECTRONICS‘ 2012 18-20 June, Palanga, Lithuania

  11. Statistical analysis of investigated indicators ELECTRONICS‘ 2012 18-20 June, Palanga, Lithuania

  12. Results (1) • Using point to point measurements: • the greatest values of PTT were found to be when estimated between the peaks of the second order derivatives, • the lowest – when the beginning of the pulse wave was estimated using regressive method. • difference – about 6 ms. ELECTRONICS‘ 2012 18-20 June, Palanga, Lithuania

  13. Results (2) • Using the multipoint method: • maximum time period was found when calculation of the phase latency was done between the derivatives of the pulse waves, • an exceptionally short time was observed when the phase latency was calculated using the cross-correlation function between the first order derivatives of the waves, • the difference – about 10 ms. ELECTRONICS‘ 2012 18-20 June, Palanga, Lithuania

  14. PWV statistical indicators and the differences between them expressed by the Student (N=18) ELECTRONICS‘ 2012 18-20 June, Palanga, Lithuania

  15. Conclusions • Comparative analysis showed that using the different algorithms for the pulse wave analysis the results can differ significantly. • Only stability of incoming parameters in dynamics enables selection of several algorithms. • The most stable measurements were obtained using the time calculation algorithms between the peaks of the first and second order derivatives of the waves. • Multipoint (cross-correlation and cross-spectral) analytical methods showed that accurate results can be obtained from the second order derivatives of the pulse wave. ELECTRONICS‘ 2012 18-20 June, Palanga, Lithuania

More Related