1 / 17

The PRR: Linking Assessment, Planning & Budgeting PRR Workshop – April 4, 2013

The PRR: Linking Assessment, Planning & Budgeting PRR Workshop – April 4, 2013. Barbara Samuel Loftus, Ph.D. Misericordia University. (2) PRR Objectives.

Download Presentation

The PRR: Linking Assessment, Planning & Budgeting PRR Workshop – April 4, 2013

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. The PRR: Linking Assessment, Planning & Budgeting PRR Workshop – April 4, 2013 Barbara Samuel Loftus, Ph.D. Misericordia University

  2. (2) PRR Objectives • To determine the current status of the implementation of processes for the assessment of institutional effectiveness + assessment of student learning outcomes (Standards 7 & 14) • To assess the extent to which linked institutional planning + budgeting processes are in place (Standards 2 & 3)

  3. Institutional Effectiveness + Student Learning Outcomes • Demonstration of organized, documented + sustained assessment processes • Clearly articulated institutional + unit-level goals • Student learning outcomes at institutional, program + course level • Implemented strategies to achieve those goals • Assessed achievement of those goals

  4. Institutional Effectiveness + Student Learning Outcomes • Used the results of assessments to: • Improve programs, services, teaching, + learning • Inform planning • Inform resource allocation decisions

  5. Institutional Effectiveness + Student Learning Outcomes • Note: • Evidence provided of assessment results • Processes + results are documented • Structures in place to ensure success • Evidence of a culture of assessment – faculty, staff, senior leadership • Guidelines, policies, resources + support of assessment initiatives • Communication-sharing of results

  6. Institutional Effectiveness + Student Learning Outcomes • Primary Context: • Standard 7: Institutional Assessment • Standard 14: Assessment of Student Learning • Resource: “Assessing Student Learning + Institutional Effectiveness: Understanding Middle States Expectations”

  7. Assessing Institutional Effectiveness • Development of linkages: • Institutional Mission + Institutional Goals • Administrative Unit + Academic Program Goals (Annual Reports; Measures of Success; Assessment Results; Budget Resources) • Strategic Plan Goals (Performance Indicators)

  8. Assessing Institutional Effectiveness • Examples of Institutional Effectiveness College/University Measurements: • NSSE • Graduating Senior Surveys • Alumni Surveys • Retention + Graduation Rates

  9. Assessing Institutional Effectiveness • Strategic Plan Annual Review Process = oversight + tracking progress of strategic plan goals (in terms of goal achievement) • Assessment of Key Factors in Strategic Plan: • Timely completion of action steps • Progress of quantitative performance indicators toward goals • Achievement of financial targets • Need for changes in context of plan or implementation

  10. Assessment of Student Learning • Academic Programs • Links between program goals, institutional mission and related institutional goals, strategic plan goals + general education program • Program learning outcomes (align course outcomes with program-level outcomes) • Methods of assessment • Implementation of assessment plans • Use of results to improve student learning

  11. Assessment of Student Learning • Example: Academic Program Annual Report • Documented program assessment plan • Student learning outcomes assessment report • Anticipated changes based on assessment results • Resources (budget requests) required for improvements

  12. Assess Institutional Effectiveness + Student Learning Summary Points: • Evidence of organized + sustained processes • Evidence that results are being used to improve programs + services • Evidence that results are being used to inform planning + resource allocation decisions

  13. Linked Institutional Planning + Budgeting Processes • Thorough overview + analysis of institution’s planning + budgeting processes • Demonstration of how those processes are integrated + linked • Evidence of key planning documents • Primary Context: Standard 2: Planning, Resource Allocation, + Institutional Renewal

  14. Linked Institutional Planning + Budgeting Processes • Note: • Ongoing planning + resource allocation based on mission + goals • Objectives developed to achieve goals • Use assessment results for institutional renewal • Evidence of strategic plan implementation + resource allocation • Evaluation of success of strategic plan + resource allocation as quality improvement

  15. Budget Process Goals • Support the Strategic Plan • Allocate resources needed to implement successfully • Congruence of the annual budget with strategic plan objectives + action steps • Support Department + Academic Program Operational Needs = Annual Budget Development Process

  16. Annual Budget Development Process • Organization of Administrative Department/ Academic Program Annual Report • Link department/program goals to institutional goals • Enrollment trends/ SWOT/ Student Support • 3-year forecasts – enrollment expectations, faculty/ staff requests, expense requirements, capital needs • Resources required for improvements based on assessment information

  17. Linked Institutional Planning + Budgeting Processes • Summary Points • Evidence of documented + inclusive processes • Evidence of integrated strategic, department + academic program plans • Ensure that institution’s mission + vision remain central • Revenues + expenses are in proper relationship • Capital needs are defined

More Related