National emergency communications plan necp goal 2
Download
1 / 18

National Emergency Communications Plan (NECP) Goal 2 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 152 Views
  • Updated On :

National Emergency Communications Plan (NECP) Goal 2. Alan H. Komenski SIEC Project Manager/State Interoperability Coordinator. January 21, 2011. NECP Goal 2. NECP Goal 2.

Related searches for National Emergency Communications Plan (NECP) Goal 2

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'National Emergency Communications Plan (NECP) Goal 2' - kathy


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
National emergency communications plan necp goal 2 l.jpg

National Emergency Communications Plan (NECP)Goal 2

Alan H. Komenski

SIEC Project Manager/State Interoperability Coordinator

January 21, 2011


Slide2 l.jpg

NECP Goal 2

NECP Goal 2

By 2011, 75 percent of non-UASI jurisdictions are able to demonstrate response-level emergency communications within one hour for routine events involving multiple jurisdictions and agencies.


Slide3 l.jpg

Goal 2 Overall Approach

  • Two types of data to be collected:

    • Capabilities (based on SAFECOM Continuum lanes)

    • Performance (response-level incident data)

  • Counties / County-equivalents were selected to provide standardized reporting data.

    • Can be analyzed against Census data for population, land area, etc.

    • Will provide the most comprehensive look at interoperability in the United States ever collected.

  • Washington’s submitted selected methodology is to collect data from each county.

  • HLS will direclty reach out to the Tribes


Benefits of demonstrating the goals l.jpg
Benefits of Demonstrating the Goals

Goals measurement provides a comprehensive view of interoperability in the U.S.

Identify emergency communications needs at the local levels

Help target TA, grants, and other support

Prepare public safety community for next generation technologies

Identify best practices and success stories


Goal 2 capability data l.jpg
Goal 2 Capability Data

  • Questions are based on past efforts:

    • SAFECOM Continuum

    • 2006 Baseline Survey

    • TICP Initiative

  • Results should be generalized for the entire county

  • Questions focuses on:

    • Governance

    • SOPs

    • Technology

    • Training & Exercise

    • Usage

  • The NECP Capabilities Assessment Guide will assist with collection of data for Goal 2


Goal 2 performance data l.jpg
Goal 2 Performance Data

  • Performance data should be based on one or more county events evaluated using the Response-level criteria.

  • Counties can use a variety of methods to measure performance:

    • Exercises

    • Planned Events

    • Real World Incidents

  • Criteria focus on 3 key areas:

    • Common Policies & Procedures

    • Leadership Roles & Responsibilities

    • Quality & Continuity of Communications

  • A web-based reporting tool is available to collect and submit results to the SWIC.

    • https://franz.spawar.navy.mil/

    • Click on link to the Response-Level Communications Tool


Slide8 l.jpg

Outreach Materials

State Fact Sheet

State Goal 2 PowerPoint

Guidance Documents

County Capabilities Report on Interoperable Communications

Response-Level Communications Evaluation Form

Resources: Toolkit

8


Slide9 l.jpg

How is it Measured:Implementation Phases for Regional Approach

Phase 5

Phase 4

Phase 3

Phase 1

Phase 2

Demonstrate Performance

Submit Data to State and DHS

Response-Level Data Validated

Organize Regional Meeting

Conduct Regional Meeting

  • Committee in the region completes capabilities data.

  • Regional HLS Manager champions commitment from one POC per county to complete response-level emergency communications performance data.

  • POC submits performance data to regional governance group for review and validation.

  • Regional Chair submits all forms to SWIC.

SWIC completes Statewide Goal 2 capabilities and performance forms and submits information.

SWIC meets with Regional HLS managers.

HLS Regional Manager or POC works with county emergency response agencies to complete the response-level emergency communications after-incident report.

DAY 2

DAY 3

ValidateResponse-Level Data


Goal 2 implementation timeline l.jpg
Goal 2 Implementation Timeline

  • Dates and milestones for Goal 2 collection

    • Kick off meeting - January 21

    • Response-Level Communications Workshop

      • (If needed TBD, probably March)

    • Response-Level Communications Training Webinars

      • Various dates beginning January 25 through late August

    • Deadline for counties to submit data to SWIC – September 15


Slide12 l.jpg

Contact Information:

Alan H. Komenski

SIEC Project Manager/State Interoperability Coordinator

425-401-7802 or 360-561-2109

alan.komenski@wsp.wa.gov

12



Slide15 l.jpg

How is it Measured:Implementation Phases for Statewide Approach

Phase 1

Phase 2

Phase 3

Phase 4

Phase 5

Identify County POC

Demonstrate Performance

Organize SIGB Meeting

POC works with county emergency response agencies to complete the response-level emergency communications after-incident report.

POC submits performance data to SWIC, SIGB and county leaders for review and validation.

SWIC obtains commitment from at least one POC per county to complete response-level emergency communications performance data.

SWIC organizes SIGB meeting to complete and validate capabilities questionnaire per county.

SWIC completes Statewide Goal 2 capabilities and performance forms and submits information.

Validate Response-Level Data

Submit Data to State & DHS


Slide16 l.jpg

How is it Measured:Implementation Phases for Regional Approach

Phase 5

Phase 4

Phase 3

Phase 1

Phase 2

Demonstrate Performance

Submit Data to State and DHS

Response-Level Data Validated

Organize Regional Meeting

Conduct Regional Meeting

  • Committee completes capabilities data.

  • Regional Chair champions commitment from one POC per county to complete response-level emergency communications performance data.

  • POC submits performance data to regional governance group for review and validation.

  • Regional Chair submits all forms to SWIC.

SWIC completes Statewide Goal 2 capabilities and performance forms and submits information.

SWIC organizes regional governance group meeting with one representative from each county.

POC works with county emergency response agencies to complete the response-level emergency communications after-incident report.

DAY 2

DAY 3

ValidateResponse-Level Data


Slide17 l.jpg

How is it Measured:Implementation Phases for County Approach

Phase 1

Phase 2

Phase 3

Phase 4

Demonstrate Performance

Submit Data to State and DHS

Organize Regional Meeting

POCs work with county emergency response agencies to complete capabilities form and the response-level emergency communications web-based after-incident report.

POCs submit capabilities and performance data to SWIC, SIGB and county leaders for review and validation.

SWIC completes Statewide Goal 2 capabilities and performance forms and submits information.

SWIC obtains commitment from at least two POCs per county to complete response-level emergency communications capabilities and performance data.

DAY 2

DAY 3

Validate Response-Level Data


Slide18 l.jpg

How is it Measured:Implementation Phases for Regional Approach

Phase 5

Phase 4

Phase 3

Phase 1

Phase 2

Demonstrate Performance

Submit Data to State and DHS

Response-Level Data Validated

Organize Regional Meeting

Conduct Regional Meeting

  • Committee in the region completes capabilities data.

  • Regional HLS Manager champions commitment from one POC per county to complete response-level emergency communications performance data.

  • POC submits performance data to regional governance group for review and validation.

  • Regional Chair submits all forms to SWIC.

SWIC completes Statewide Goal 2 capabilities and performance forms and submits information.

SWIC meets with Regional HLS managers.

HLS Regional Manager or POC works with county emergency response agencies to complete the response-level emergency communications after-incident report.

DAY 2

DAY 3

ValidateResponse-Level Data