1 / 20

Lynn Hrabik, MPH, RD, CD

Coalition Model Evaluation Summary. Lynn Hrabik, MPH, RD, CD. AGENDA. 1 : Evaluation purpose. 2 : Evaluation basis and design. 3 : Key results and implications. www.uwex.edu/ces/pdande/ www.cdc.gov/eval/framework/index.htm. 2. Concrete. 1 Evaluation Purpose.

kaspar
Download Presentation

Lynn Hrabik, MPH, RD, CD

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Coalition Model Evaluation Summary Lynn Hrabik, MPH, RD, CD

  2. AGENDA 1: Evaluation purpose 2: Evaluation basis and design 3: Key results and implications

  3. www.uwex.edu/ces/pdande/www.cdc.gov/eval/framework/index.htm

  4. 2. Concrete 1 Evaluation Purpose Image source: http://www.cdc.gov/nccdphp/dnpa/socialmarketing/training/phase5/evaluation_purpose.htm

  5. Overall goals of the evaluation: Document the current coalition model Determine satisfaction with coalition model Determine what coalition structure/leadership/processes enhance outcome attainment Determine “value added” aspect of coalition model

  6. 2 Evaluation Basis and Design Image source: http://farm1.static.flickr.com/109/286116530_8a2c9df20d.jpg

  7. 500-1000* SUPPORTERS Defining Active Members 75-100 MEMBERS 20-50 ACTIVE 5-10 CORE *Rough estimate,  actual totals depend on population. Source: Midwest Academy

  8. 3 Key Results and Implications Image source: http://farm5.staticflickr.com/4026/5158123903_939b33dcb6_o.jpg

  9. Member Survey Participation • Overall response rate: 20% (115 responses, 561 invitations) • Range of responses by coalition: 0 - 12 • Range of response rates by coalition: 0% - 63% • Respondents involved in coalition for 3 or more years: 67%

  10. Processes

  11. Leadership & Staffing “Leadership has strong character and integrity. They reach out for assistance, guidance, advice, are not controlling, good listeners and action-oriented.” “We have a great coordinator who has done great things for us! When we need information within our county in the realm of tobacco products we can call and she gets the information we need, and she does it quickly!”

  12. Structure

  13. Collaborative Synergy

  14. Connecting the Dots…. The majority of members are satisfied with how the coalitions function, what they work on, and the progress they have seen.

  15. Some Recommendations • Increase the diversity of members, and try new ways of marketing the coalition and its activities (including more partnerships with other coalitions/groups) • More ability to work on localized activities • More use of formalized rules, structures and practices

  16. Have questions? Want more information? hrabik@wisc.edu 920-833-0051

More Related