440 likes | 533 Views
Dive into the world of concave trading strategies in equity funds, exploring challenges, evidence, and implications for fund management and performance. Discover how fund managers can utilize concave strategies to outperform benchmarks.
E N D
Concave payoff patterns in equity fund holdings and transactions Stephen J. BrownNYU Stern School of Business David R. GallagherUniversity of NSW Onno SteenbeekErasmus University / ABP Investments Peter L. SwanUniversity of NSW
Challenge to active managment • Zero or negative alpha in fund returns • Can fund managers earn returns commensurate with fees they charge?
Challenge to active managment • Zero or negative alpha in fund returns • Can fund managers earn returns commensurate with fees they charge? • Recent evidence shows active trading does generate positive returns (Wermers 2000)
Challenge to active managment • Zero or negative alpha in fund returns • Can fund managers earn returns commensurate with fees they charge? • Recent evidence shows active trading does generate positive returns (Wermers 2000) • Negative quadratic term in market model • Can fund managers time the market?
Challenge to active managment • Zero or negative alpha in fund returns • Can fund managers earn returns commensurate with fees they charge? • Recent evidence shows active trading does generate positive returns (Wermers 2000) • Negative quadratic term in market model • Can fund managers time the market? • Recent evidence shows hedge fund managers use concave payout overlay strategies (Agarwall & Naik 2004)
Overview • Definition of concave payoff patterns • Detecting concave payoff strategies • Evidence from managed funds
Concave payout strategies • Zero net investment overlay strategy (Weisman 2002) • Uses only public information • Designed to yield Sharpe ratio greater than benchmark • Using strategies that are concave to benchmark
Concave payout strategies • Zero net investment overlay strategy (Weisman 2002) • Uses only public information • Designed to yield Sharpe ratio greater than benchmark • Using strategies that are concave to benchmark • Why should we care? • Sharpe ratio obviously inappropriate here • But is metric of choice of hedge funds and derivatives traders
We should care! • Delegated fund management • Fund flow, compensation based on historical performance • Limited incentive to monitor high Sharpe ratios • Behavioral issues • Prospect theory: lock in gains, gamble on loss • Are there incentives to control this behavior?
Sharpe Ratio of Benchmark Sharpe ratio = .631
Maximum Sharpe Ratio Sharpe ratio = .748
Examples of concave payout strategies • Long-term asset mix guidelines
Examples of concave payout strategies • Unhedged short volatility • Writing out of the money calls and puts
Examples of concave payout strategies • Loss averse trading • a.k.a. “Doubling”
Examples of informationless investing • Long-term asset mix guidelines • Unhedged short volatility • Writing out of the money calls and puts • Loss averse trading • a.k.a. “Doubling”
Forensic Finance • Implications of concave payoff strategies • Patterns of returns
Forensic Finance • Implications of Informationless investing • Patterns of returns • are returns concave to benchmark?
Forensic Finance • Implications of concave payoff strategies • Patterns of returns • are returns concave to benchmark? • Patterns of security holdings
Forensic Finance • Implications of concave payoff strategies • Patterns of returns • are returns concave to benchmark? • Patterns of security holdings • do security holdings produce concave payouts?
Forensic Finance • Implications of concave payoff strategies • Patterns of returns • are returns concave to benchmark? • Patterns of security holdings • do security holdings produce concave payouts? • Patterns of trading
Forensic Finance • Implications of concave payoff strategies • Patterns of returns • are returns concave to benchmark? • Patterns of security holdings • do security holdings produce concave payouts? • Patterns of trading • does pattern of trading lead to concave payouts?
Hedge funds follow concave strategies R-rf =α + β (RS&P- rf) + γ(RS&P- rf)2
Hedge funds follow concave strategies R-rf =α + β (RS&P- rf) + γ(RS&P- rf)2 Concave strategies: tβ > 1.96 & tγ < -1.96
Hedge funds follow concave strategies R-rf =α + β (RS&P- rf) + γ(RS&P- rf)2 Source: TASS/Tremont
Portfolio Analytics Database • 36 Australian institutional equity funds managers • Data on • Portfolio holdings • Daily returns • Aggregate returns • Fund size • 59 funds (no more than 4 per manager) • 51 active • 3 enhanced index funds • 4 passive • 1 international
Patterns of Trading • Buying on a loss and selling on a gain leads to concave payouts • Short Volatility replication • Loss averse trading (a.k.a. “Doubling”)
Short Volatility Strategy Sharpe ratio = .743
A clear and present danger? • Evidence of concave payout pattern in managed funds • Evidence in returns • Evidence in security holdings • Evidence in pattern of transactions • Consistent with • Adverse incentive story • Behavioral theories of trading • Effect limited to large, diversified funds