1 / 20

National Traceability NAIS-Update

National Traceability NAIS-Update. “Protecting Animal Agriculture”. Today’s Disease Risk. 23,580 Shipments = Over 17 million animals. Intensification and Globalization. Do We Need a more Effective Disease Traceability System?. Enhance disease response

Download Presentation

National Traceability NAIS-Update

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. National Traceability NAIS-Update “Protecting Animal Agriculture”

  2. Today’s Disease Risk 23,580Shipments = Over 17 million animals Intensification and Globalization

  3. Do We Need a more Effective Disease Traceability System? • Enhance disease response • Goal “to identify premises and animals that had direct contact with diseases of concern within 48 hours after discovery.” • Reduce impact of animal health incidents or agro-terrorism events • Improve our response to animal emergency events • Industry and Producer Benefits • Maintain confidence in animal products • Gain market access and consumer demand

  4. Not a New Concept • Animal Health officials have performed individual identification of certain animals and premises (locations with livestock and poultry) for over a century • Used to identify and test animals for diseases • Brucellosis (Since 1940’s) • Used to identify vaccinated heifers for brucellosis • Identified individual animals with a unique tag • Linked to a location at time of vaccination

  5. Remember Why !! • Today, animal health officials can not effectively respond to disease threats with current animal ID & traceability programs. • Tuberculosis - CA, MI, MN, TX (02,04, 05, 07-08) • Exotic Newcastle Disease – AZ, CA, NV, TX (02, 03) • High Path Avian Influenza –TX (04) • Vesicular Stomatitis – CO, ID, MT, NM, TX, UT, WY (03, 04, 05, 06) • BSE – AL, TX, WA, (04-06) • Brucellosis – ID, TX, WY(06-07) • Equine Herpes Virus – CA, CO, CT, FL, KY, NJ, VA (06,07)

  6. Poor Animal TraceabilityWill Cost Producers Money • 1999 UC Davis Disease Study (Ekboir) • Foot and Mouth Disease outbreak would result in $6 to $14 billion in losses to the agriculture industry • Loss of $1 to $3 million for every hour delay in tracking the index animal/herd

  7. Traceability It’s all about Foot and Mouth Disease and BSE, right?

  8. Traceability No! • CDFA conducts disease tracing all year • CDFA conducted 215 Brucellosis investigations in 2006 with some years as high as 600 investigations. • Other diseases of interest included Trichomonosis, TB, and diseases associated with other species (scrapie). • Identification and good records are critical for tracking down the source of the problem. • Resources and personnel investigate each event with the best available tools (I.e., paper records, rancher’s memory).

  9. National Animal ID System (NAIS) • Established in 2002 • Industry leaders developed the U.S. Animal Identification Plan • Cooperative State-Federal-Industry program • USDA Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) administers the system • Voluntary program • 48 hour traceability objective

  10. National Animal ID System • PIN- Premises ID Number • 7 digit alphanumeric (A123R45) • AIN-Animal Identification Number • 15 digit numeric (840 123456789012) • Animal Tracing • Date of event • Type of event (move in, move out) • AIN • PIN

  11. Animal Identification • USDA is technology neutral • Specifies that the official identification number is the visible number • Electronic or identification is considered supplementary • Cattle Species Working Group (SWG) recommended visible low frequency Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) in left ear • Equine SWG recommends RFID microchip 840 982

  12. Animal Identification & Tracing • 7 manufacturers • 22 RFID and visual tags approved • 2 microchip transponder • 5 fully compliant animal tracing databases • 12 tracing databases in development

  13. Prioritization of species/sectors • Tier 1 • Primary food animals • Cattle, Swine, Poultry (Chickens and Turkeys), Sheep, and Goats • Equine – competition horse industry • Tier 2 • All other livestock

  14. Prioritization of species/sectors • Focus where enhancements offer the greatest value/merit • Disease risk • Human health risk • Capability of existing infrastructure • Economic merit • Potential for disease spread

  15. Prioritization of species/sectors

  16. Harmonization • Work with government and industry programs • Breed associations • Alliances • Agricultural Marketing Services-QSA and PVP • COOL • International efforts • Mexico & Canada

  17. Convergence and Integration • Integration with disease programs • Uniform standards for data collection • PIN will be the only location identifier for disease programs • Apply to Interstate Certificates of Veterinary Inspection (ICVI’s)

  18. Partnership and Collaboration • Work with states to advance traceability • Collaboration with Industry Partners • Veterinarians • Brand Inspection • USAIO • Angus Association • FFA • Packers and Renders • IMI Global/ • Humane Farm Animal Care • IDairy

  19. Final Thoughts • Investigation of disease events takes place on a frequent basis and not every 10 to 20 years. • Current premises identification, animal identification, and animal tracing tools are not adequate to effectively manage animal diseases or incidents. • The livestock industry has an opportunity to shape a national traceability program, but it will take active participation to make it your program!

  20. Questions www.californiaid.org

More Related