Summit high school 2012 2013 results
Download
1 / 16

Summit High School 2012-2013 Results - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 82 Views
  • Uploaded on

Summit High School 2012-2013 Results. SHS serves a population of 765 students. 30 % (230) of which are non-white, 25% (191) of the students at SHS are Hispanic/Latino, 34 % (260) qualify for Free and Reduced Meal , 22 % (168) are English Language Learners, and

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'Summit High School 2012-2013 Results' - kasia


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript

Shs serves a population of 765 students
SHS serves a population of 765 students

  • 30% (230) of which are non-white,

  • 25% (191) of the students at SHS are Hispanic/Latino,

  • 34% (260) qualify for Free and Reduced Meal,

  • 22% (168) are English Language Learners, and

  • 11% (84) of our students are students with disabilities.


Trend analysis academic achievement shs overall proficient or advanced
Trend Analysis: Academic Achievement - SHS Overall - % Proficient or Advanced

Notable trends in overall achievement. The gains seen in 2012 Reading and Writing in 9th grade were fairly stable in 2013. The 10th grade Math scores over the past three years have increased 18.3 points. Tenth grade Science scores have increased 15.9 points. Upward trend is likely due to increased numbers of students in advanced classes and high academic expectations for all.


Academic growth math
Academic Growth - Math 

  • SHS Overall           State Expectation

Notable trend in Median Growth Gap and Adequate Growth Gap.

The gap between Median Growth and Adequate Growth has decreased

13% points.


Academic growth gaps reading
Academic Growth Gaps – Reading

Notable trend in Median Growth Gap and Adequate Growth Gap. The gap between the two populations was 18% in 2011 and 4% in 2012.

Students with Disabilities outgrew the overall population growth in reading by 2% in 2013. The Students with Disabilities subgroup did not meet the

Median Adequate Student Growth Percentile, but its Median Student Growth Percentile for Reading was 63, rating a Meets. Success was attributed

to increased progress monitoring of fluency, vocabulary, and comprehension skills, using YPP, and adjusting strategic and intensive instruction

based on monitoring. Increased instructional time through Mastery Reading and Strategic Reading classes was realized. Increased efficient use

of instructional time due to the implementation of positive behavioral supports was achieved.


Academic growth gaps writing
Academic Growth Gaps – Writing

The Median Growth Percentile in Writing for Students with Disabilities when compared to the Median Growth Percentile for students overall suffered

a slight dip but is stable.  The gap between the two populations was 17% in 2011, 10% in 2012, and 11% in 2013. The Students with Disabilities subgroup

did not meet the Median Adequate Student Growth Percentile for Writing, but its Median Student Growth Percentile was 55, rating a Meets expectations.

Successes were attributed to provision of interventions in Strategic Writing (increased instructional time and opportunities to provide feedback to students

about their writing), provision of increased academic rigor for all students as a result of raised academic expectations through exposure to high level of

curriculum, and increased progress monitoring of skills and adjusting instruction based on monitoring. Increased efficient use of instructional time due to

the implementation of positive behavioral supports was achieved.


Academic growth gaps math
Academic Growth Gaps – Math

The Median Growth Percentile in Math for Students with Disabilities when compared to the Median Growth Percentile for Non-Disabled Students

increased in 2012 but decreased in 2013.  The gap between the two populations was 13% in 2011, and -9% in 2012, and 12% in 2013. The

Students with Disabilities subgroup did not meet the Median Adequate Student Growth Percentile for Math, but its Median Student Growth Percentile

was 50, rating an Approaching expectations. Successes were due to provision of standards-based assessments, provision of interventions in Math Labs

(increased instructional time and opportunities to provide feedback to students about their mathematics), and provision of increased academic rigor for

all students as a result of raised academic expectations through exposure to high level of curriculum. Increased efficient use of instructional time due

to the implementation of positive behavioral supports was achieved. Root causes for stagnation of student growth and decrease of academic growth

for students with disabilities included insufficient differentiation to meet students where they’re at and inadequate progress monitoring of skills and the

needed adjustment of instruction based on this monitoring.



Incidents 2012 2013 compared to 2011 2012
Incidents January, 2014)2012-2013 compared to 2011-2012

40% decrease in drug violation incidents

24% decrease in total incidents

41% decrease in out-of-school suspensions

64% increase in in-school suspensions

77% decrease in number of incidents referred to law enforcement


Last year s goals
Last Year’s Goals January, 2014)


2013 2014 targets
2013-2014 Targets January, 2014)


Summit high school 2012 2013 results

Major Improvement Strategy #1: January, 2014)Using Data Teams tomaximize positive feedback loops that are reinforcing (SBG rubrics and/or YPP) and negative feedback loops that are self-correcting (engagement, SBG rubrics, YPP)


Major improvement strategy 2 family school community partnering
Major Improvement Strategy #2: January, 2014)Family/School/Community Partnering


Major improvement strategy 3 student engagement
Major Improvement Strategy #3: January, 2014) Student Engagement