1 / 28

IST in FP6

Information session 8 March 2002. IST in FP6. Daniele Rizzi Directorate-General Information Society - Unit D1. Agenda. IST in FP6. Overview of the FP6 situation Content Council and Parliament agendas Instruments. IST in FP6. Context Content Tools.

karlyn
Download Presentation

IST in FP6

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Information session 8 March 2002 IST in FP6 Daniele RizziDirectorate-General Information Society - Unit D1

  2. Agenda IST in FP6 • Overview of the FP6 situation • Content • Council and Parliament agendas • Instruments

  3. IST in FP6 • Context • Content • Tools

  4. The timetable for FP6: Framework Programme Framework Programme (co-decision procedure, Article 251) January 2 Council common position February 4-7 EP takes note of the common position and starts the 2nd reading (up to 3+1 mohths) March 11 Research Council May 13-16 EP 2nd reading opinion July Council 2nd reading (up to 3+1 months) Sept. - Oct. Conciliation (up to 6+2 weeks) September 30 Research Council Sept. - Oct. Co-decision (up to 6+2 weeks) November 29 Research Council Commission's modified proposal for the Sixth Multiannual Framework Programme for RTD Aimed at contributing to the creation of the European Research Area(2002-2006): COM (2001) 709 of 22.11.2001 http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/en/com/pdf/2001/en_501PC0709_02.pdf

  5. The timetable for FP6: Specific Programmes Specific Programmes (Consultation procedure, Article 166) January - February Commission's modified proposals January - February Nomination of EP rapporteurs March 11 Research Council: (orientation) debate June-July EP opinion September 30 Research Council: political agreement October Adoption by the Council Amended Commission proposals for the specific programmes of the Sixth Framework Programme: COM (2002) 43 of 30.01.2002 http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/en/com/pdf/2002/com2002_0043en01.pdf

  6. The timetable for FP6: Rules Rules for participation and dissemination (co-decision procedure, Article 251) Scenario without conciliation (with conciliation: adoption delayed until Jan-Feb/03) January Nomination of EP rapporteur (Mrs Q. Rowohl PPE-DE/D) March 11 Research Council: orientation debate May 13-16 EP 1st reading June 2 Council common position July 1-4 EP starts the 2nd reading (up to 3+1 months) September 23-26 EP 2nd reading opinion September 30 Research Council November Council 2nd reading (up to 3+1 months) November 29 Research Council - Adoption by the EP and Council Amended Commission proposals for the rules for participation - EC framework programme: COM (2001) 822 of 10.01.2002 http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/en/com/pdf/2001/en_501PC0822.pdf

  7. Workprogramme 2003 preparation • May 2002: Draft strategic document • European competitiveness / positioning • Industrial and academic viewpoints • Issues: Dependencies, new areas to be developed, which EU funding .. • April-June 2002: Call for expressions of interest • Submission of ideas for Integrated Projects and Networks of Excellence in the thematic priority areas • June: WP2003 skeleton • July 2002: First draft workprogramme 2003 • December 2002: First FP6 call

  8. FP6 and the European Research Area • Moving to a European level Research Policy • Strengthen co-operation between National and EU activities • Concentration and focussing of effort and added-value • Improve links between National and EU policies and schemes • Further preparation for the EU enlargement process • Aims to simplify management and implementation procedures • FP6 is an essential tool in support of ERA see: Communication from the Commission "Making a reality of the European research Area: Guidelines for EU Research activities (2000-2006)” COM (2000) 612 Final - 04.10.2000 http://www.cordis.lu/rtd2002/era-debate/cec.htm

  9. Commission proposal “Specific Programmes” (May 2001)

  10. Main IST related parts of FP6

  11. An overview of IST in FP6 • Context • Content • Tools

  12. Security, privacy IPRs, dependabilty Smart cards,... Health, eInclusion, mobility, environment safety, cultural heritage GRIDS for science, engineering business and society E and m business, e and m work, learning Trust & Confidence IST for societal challenges IST for economic challenges Demanding applications Applied IST for major societal and economic challenges Pervasive, mobile, wireless, trustful infrastructures Miniaturised, low cost low power components & µsytems Natural interactions with ‘ knowledge ’  Communication & networking Software µ, nano & opto electronics µ and nano systems Knowledge technologies interfaces • Mobile: beyond 3G • Fixed:All optical • Integrated (IPv6) • Adaptive • Reliable • Embedded • Distributed • Adaptable • CMOS : the limit • System-on-Chip • Nano-scale • New materials • Multidiscplines • New Sensing • Networked • New materials • Nano-scale • Context based • Semantic based • Agent based • Scaleable • All senses • Multilingual • Intuitive • ‘Surrounding’ Specific integration Anywhere anytime natural and enjoyable access to IST services for ALL Building blocks Generic

  13. Context • Content • Instruments An overview of IST in FP6

  14. Instruments: Rationale • Higher integration and building critical mass • Realising ERA • Simplifications of procedures • Larger autonomy • higher responsibility for the consortium • Higher flexibility

  15. FP6: 3 (+1+1) instruments for “priority areas” • Integrated Projects • Objective driven • Networks of Excellence • Exploratory research • Article 169 • Member states initiative • + Targeted research projects ... • Address specific issues • + Co-ordination activities Speaking notes + feedback: Introduction to the instruments available for implementing the FP6 priority thematic areas http://europa.eu.int/comm/research/nfp/pdf/instruments_280202final.pdf

  16. Integrated projects: characteristics • Integration • All elements of technology chain to attain high-impact goals • Different type of activities: • RTD, technology transfer, training, dissemination, demonstration… • Global funding involving public & private funds • Size • The necessary size to attain its goals • Participation • 3 legal entities at least (2 from MSs) • minimum can be changed in the WP • supports industry-academia collaboration including SMEs

  17. IPs: implementation • Selection on a call for proposal basis • possible call for expression of interests, to select themes • Large degree of autonomy • Allocations of budgets • Possibility to launch calls for participation • Subsequent calls for additional “tasks” and funding by the Commission • Funding • Grant to the budget up to 50% • Different ceilings depending on the activity

  18. IPs : Three possible implementations • “Incremental” participation • Tasks identified • budget known • not all participants are in • “Incremental” funding • objectives known • technology roadmap known • tasks to be completed • budget to be changed • Participants as well • “Monolithic” • Partners known at outset • Tasks identified • budget known Working document + feedback: Provisions for implementing Integrated Projects http://europa.eu.int/comm/research/nfp/pdf/provisionsimplementingip-28022002.pdf

  19. Networks of Excellence (NoEs): characteristics • “Virtual” centre of excellence • brings together the research effort on a particular topic • a clearly identified “joint programme of activity” • established or emerging fields • Size • Several MEuro funding per year for the “Integrated effort” • Support to different types of activities: • RTD, training, transfer, mobility... • Participants • Minimum 3: Universities, Research Labs, Industrial LabsSpecial Measures planned for SME’s

  20. NoEs: Implementation • Selection on the basis of calls for proposals • Large degree of autonomy • Possibility to modify plans and allocation of work • possibility to launch a call for participation • Funding • Grant for integration • Up to 25% of total effort that is put together Working document + feedback: Provisions for implementing Networks of Excellence http://europa.eu.int/comm/research/nfp/pdf/provisions-implement-net-excel.pdf

  21. Article 169 • At the initiative of the member states • Support to “national” programmes jointly executed according to article 169 • EC funding used to support the jointly executed programmes • Lukewarm reception by Council & Parliament • No precedents, no rules (yet) for FP6 participation • 5 pilots under development in DG_R (end-Jan 02)(DG Information Society not currently involved in pilots) • Bio-diversity (MS=3+3) • Clinical Trials (MS=13) • Ocean Drilling (MS=3+10) • Sustainable impact assessment (MS=7) • Air Traffic Management (MS=?) • Global Change (?)

  22. Targeted RTD projects • Principle: Similar to current RTD contracts • Funding: Grant to budget up to 50 % • Launching: Calls for proposals • Participation: At least two MSs

  23. Coordination activities • Similar to current thematic networks • Support to logistics, .. • can cover up to 100% of additional costs

  24. FP6: Instruments for “anticipating & strengthening” • RTD supporting policiesRTD supporting new S&T areas • Targeted RTD Projects, similar to current shared cost contracts • Networking of Member State research activities • Focused Calls with annual workprogrammes • “Strengthening…” • Grants : to co-ordination of RTD • Grants : for development of a coherent policy • Support to SMEs • Collective.. (SMEs’ Associations + Research Centers) • Cooperative..(>2 SMEs + research centers) • Support to specific International Cooperation activities • EU’s foreign policy & development aid policy

  25. Participation 3rd Countries • IN ‘Integrating’ part • All countries • Funding possible for INCO countries • OUTSIDE ‘Integrating’ part • Countries with co-operationagreement under specified conditions • Other countries if necessary Who? • Member States AND Associated candidate Countries, same rights & obligations • European scientific cooperation organisations (ESA etc) • Minimum nbr of legal entities - IP and NoE: 3 (2 from MS) - Other instruments: 2 (1 from MS). - Fellowships & support actions: 1 possible (Nbr can be adjusted by WP)

  26. Financing Grant for integration Grant to the budget Grant as a lump sum Networks of Excellence  Integrated Projects  Targeted projects  Specific Research activities for SMEs  Integrated initiatives for Infrastructure  Actions to promote human resources and mobility   Coordination actions  Specific support actions  

  27. IPR • As in FP5 • Knowledge fully funded by Community: property by Community • Knowledge partly funded by Community: property by participants • Simplification & flexibility added • All rules can be fixed within the consortium agreement • principles provided: participants may agree additional rights • rules identical for all participants

  28. Useful addresses • European Research Area • http://www.europa.eu.int/comm/research/area.html • http://www.cordis.lu/rtd2002/era-developments/developments.htm • FP6 reference sites • http://www.europa.eu.int/comm/research/nfp.html • http://www.cordis.lu/rtd2002/fp-debate/fp.htm • CORDIS “RTD beyond 2002” • http://www.cordis.lu/rtd2002/home.html • IST in FP6 • http://www.cordis.lu/ist/fp6/fp6consult.htm • News • http://www.cordis.lu/rtd2002/news/news.htm

More Related